Literature DB >> 27256131

Privacy and Security within Biobanking: The Role of Information Technology.

Raymond Heatherly1.   

Abstract

Along with technical issues, biobanking frequently raises important privacy and security issues that must be resolved as biobanks continue to grow in scale and scope. Consent mechanisms currently in use range from fine-grained to very broad, and in some cases participants are offered very few privacy protections. However, developments in information technology are bringing improvements. New programs and systems are being developed to allow researchers to conduct analyses without distributing the data itself offsite, either by allowing the investigator to communicate with a central computer, or by having each site participate in meta-analysis that results in a shared statistic or final significance result. The implementation of security protocols into the research biobanking setting requires three key elements: authentication, authorization, and auditing. Authentication is the process of making sure individuals are who they claim to be, frequently through the use of a password, a key fob, or a physical (i.e., retinal or fingerprint) scan. Authorization involves ensuring that every individual who attempts an action has permission to do that action. Finally, auditing allows for actions to be logged so that inappropriate or unethical actions can later be traced back to their source.
© 2016 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27256131     DOI: 10.1177/1073110516644206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  6 in total

1.  Leveraging summary statistics to make inferences about complex phenotypes in large biobanks.

Authors:  Angela Gasdaska; Derek Friend; Rachel Chen; Jason Westra; Matthew Zawistowski; William Lindsey; Nathan Tintle
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2019

2.  Authentication of Patients and Participants in Health Information Exchange and Consent for Medical Research: A Key Step for Privacy Protection, Respect for Autonomy, and Trustworthiness.

Authors:  Atsushi Kogetsu; Soichi Ogishima; Kazuto Kato
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Evolving public views on the value of one's DNA and expectations for genomic database governance: Results from a national survey.

Authors:  Forrest Briscoe; Ifeoma Ajunwa; Allison Gaddis; Jennifer McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Facing new challenges to informed consent processes in the context of translational research: the case in CARPEM consortium.

Authors:  Elise Jacquier; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Cécile Badoual; Anita Burgun; Marie-France Mamzer
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Computationally efficient, exact, covariate-adjusted genetic principal component analysis by leveraging individual marker summary statistics from large biobanks.

Authors:  Jack M Wolf; Martha Barnard; Xueting Xia; Nathan Ryder; Jason Westra; Nathan Tintle
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2020

6.  Transformation of the Taiwan Biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration.

Authors:  Jui-Chu Lin; Wesley Wei-Wen Hsiao; Chien-Te Fan
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 5.531

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.