J Paul Brooks1. 1. Department of Statistical Sciences and Operations Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Center for the Study of Biological Complexity, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Department of Supply Chain Management and Analytics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. Electronic address: jpbrooks@vcu.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In case-control studies of the human microbiome, the goal is to evaluate whether cases differ from controls in the microbiome composition of a particular body habitat and which taxa are responsible for the differences. These studies leverage sequencing technology and spectroscopy that provide new measurements of the microbiome. METHODS: Three challenges in conducting reproducible microbiome research using a case-control design are compensating for differences in observed and actual microbial community composition, detecting "rare" taxa in microbial communities, and choosing properly powered analysis methods. The significance of each challenge, evaluation of commonly held views, analysis of unanswered questions, and suggestions of strategies for solutions are discussed. RESULTS: Understanding the effects of these choices on case-control analyses has been underappreciated, with an implicit assumption that further advances in technology will address all the current shortcomings. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that research on the human microbiome include positive and negative control experiments to provide insight into bias, contamination, and technical variation. Research protocols such as these may afford a better opportunity to make quantitative and qualitative adjustments to data, thereby reducing the risk of falsely positive results, increasing power to discover true disease determinants, and enhancing interpretation across studies.
PURPOSE: In case-control studies of the human microbiome, the goal is to evaluate whether cases differ from controls in the microbiome composition of a particular body habitat and which taxa are responsible for the differences. These studies leverage sequencing technology and spectroscopy that provide new measurements of the microbiome. METHODS: Three challenges in conducting reproducible microbiome research using a case-control design are compensating for differences in observed and actual microbial community composition, detecting "rare" taxa in microbial communities, and choosing properly powered analysis methods. The significance of each challenge, evaluation of commonly held views, analysis of unanswered questions, and suggestions of strategies for solutions are discussed. RESULTS: Understanding the effects of these choices on case-control analyses has been underappreciated, with an implicit assumption that further advances in technology will address all the current shortcomings. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that research on the human microbiome include positive and negative control experiments to provide insight into bias, contamination, and technical variation. Research protocols such as these may afford a better opportunity to make quantitative and qualitative adjustments to data, thereby reducing the risk of falsely positive results, increasing power to discover true disease determinants, and enhancing interpretation across studies.
Authors: Sebastian Hupfauf; Mohammad Etemadi; Marina Fernández-Delgado Juárez; María Gómez-Brandón; Heribert Insam; Sabine Marie Podmirseg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Emma Allen-Vercoe; Joseph Russell Carmical; Samuel P Forry; Mitchell H Gail; Rashmi Sinha Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Kumar P Mainali; Sharon Bewick; Peter Thielen; Thomas Mehoke; Florian P Breitwieser; Shishir Paudel; Arjun Adhikari; Joshua Wolfe; Eric V Slud; David Karig; William F Fagan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 3.240