| Literature DB >> 27255607 |
Corinne Cath1, Luciano Floridi2.
Abstract
The debate on whether and how the Internet can protect and foster human rights has become a defining issue of our time. This debate often focuses on Internet governance from a regulatory perspective, underestimating the influence and power of the governance of the Internet's architecture. The technical decisions made by Internet Standard Developing Organisations (SDOs) that build and maintain the technical infrastructure of the Internet influences how information flows. They rearrange the shape of the technically mediated public sphere, including which rights it protects and which practices it enables. In this article, we contribute to the debate on SDOs' ethical responsibility to bring their work in line with human rights. We defend three theses. First, SDOs' work is inherently political. Second, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), one of the most influential SDOs, has a moral obligation to ensure its work is coherent with, and fosters, human rights. Third, the IETF should enable the actualisation of human rights through the protocols and standards it designs by implementing a responsibility-by-design approach to engineering. We conclude by presenting some initial recommendations on how to ensure that work carried out by the IETF may enable human rights.Entities:
Keywords: Human rights; Information ethics; Internet Engineering Task Force; Internet architecture; Internet governance; Privacy; Protocols; Responsibility-by-design; Right to freedom of expression; Standard Developing Organisations; Standards; Values-by-design
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27255607 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9793-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Eng Ethics ISSN: 1353-3452 Impact factor: 3.525