Maha Almarwani1, Jessie M VanSwearingen2, Subashan Perera3, Patrick J Sparto2, Jennifer S Brach2. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: mma46@pitt.edu. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gait variability is a measure of motor control of gait. Little is known about age-related changes in the motor control of gait (gait variability) during challenging walking conditions, such as slower and faster pace walking. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of challenging walking conditions (slower and faster speeds) on gait variability in younger and older adults. DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional, observational design. METHODS: Forty younger (mean age=26.6±6.0years) and 111 community-dwelling older adults (mean age=77.3±6.0years), independent in ambulation, were studied. Gait characteristics were collected using a computerized walkway (GaitMat II™). Step length, step width, step time, swing time, stance time and double support time variability were derived as the standard deviation of all steps across the 4 passes. RESULTS: Compared to younger, older adults had a significant change in their gait variability from usual to slower in step width (-0.006±0.003), step time (0.028±0.006), swing time (0.023±0.004), stance time (0.042±0.008), and double support time (0.024±0.005). Changes in gait variability from usual to faster were not significantly different between younger and older adults. LIMITATION: Gait variability was examined during self-selected over-ground walking, where subjects directed to walk "slower", "usual" and "faster". CONCLUSIONS: Walking slowly is more challenging to the motor control of gait and may be more sensitive to age-related declines in gait than usual and faster speed walks.
BACKGROUND: Gait variability is a measure of motor control of gait. Little is known about age-related changes in the motor control of gait (gait variability) during challenging walking conditions, such as slower and faster pace walking. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of challenging walking conditions (slower and faster speeds) on gait variability in younger and older adults. DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional, observational design. METHODS: Forty younger (mean age=26.6±6.0years) and 111 community-dwelling older adults (mean age=77.3±6.0years), independent in ambulation, were studied. Gait characteristics were collected using a computerized walkway (GaitMat II™). Step length, step width, step time, swing time, stance time and double support time variability were derived as the standard deviation of all steps across the 4 passes. RESULTS: Compared to younger, older adults had a significant change in their gait variability from usual to slower in step width (-0.006±0.003), step time (0.028±0.006), swing time (0.023±0.004), stance time (0.042±0.008), and double support time (0.024±0.005). Changes in gait variability from usual to faster were not significantly different between younger and older adults. LIMITATION: Gait variability was examined during self-selected over-ground walking, where subjects directed to walk "slower", "usual" and "faster". CONCLUSIONS: Walking slowly is more challenging to the motor control of gait and may be more sensitive to age-related declines in gait than usual and faster speed walks.
Authors: Paul Gonzalo Arauz; Maria-Gabriela Garcia; Patricio Chiriboga; Sebastian Taco-Vasquez; Diego Klaic; Emilia Verdesoto; Bernard Martin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Francesca E Wade; Grace K Kellaher; Sarah Pesquera; Sidney T Baudendistel; Arkaprava Roy; David J Clark; Rachael D Seidler; Daniel P Ferris; Todd M Manini; Chris J Hass Journal: J Biomech Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Andreas Skiadopoulos; Emily E Moore; Harlan R Sayles; Kendra K Schmid; Nicholas Stergiou Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 4.262