Literature DB >> 27255222

Efficient Microscale Basic Reverse Phase Peptide Fractionation for Global and Targeted Proteomics.

Hyoung-Joo Lee1, Hye-Jung Kim1, Daniel C Liebler1.   

Abstract

Analysis of small biological samples would benefit from an efficient microscale fractionation strategy that minimizes sample handling, transfer steps, and accompanying losses. Here we describe a microscale basic reverse phase liquid chromatographic (bRPLC) fractionation method that offers high reproducibility and efficiency for peptide mixtures from small (5-20 μg) samples. We applied our platform to detect differentially expressed proteins from lung tumor cell lines that are sensitive (11-18) and resistant (11-18R) to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib. Label-free analyses of 5-20 μg samples yielded identifications of approximately 3,200 to 4,000 proteins with coefficients of variation of 1.9-8.9% in replicate analyses. iTRAQ analyses produced similar protein inventories. Label-free and iTRAQ analyses displayed high concordance in identifications of proteins differentially expressed in 11-18 and 11-18R cells. Micro-bRPLC fractionation of cell proteomes increased sensitivity by an average of 4.5-fold in targeted quantitation using parallel reaction monitoring for three representative receptor tyrosine kinases (EGFR, PDGFRA, and BMX), which are present at low abundance in 11-18 and 11-18R cells. These data illustrate the broad utility of micro-bRPLC fractionation for global and targeted proteomic analyses. Data are available through Proteome eXchange Accession PXD003604.

Entities:  

Keywords:  basic reverse-phase liquid chromatography; drug resistance; iTRAQ; label-free quantitation; parallel reaction monitoring; protein tyrosine kinase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27255222      PMCID: PMC5785084          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  26 in total

1.  Integrated microscale analysis system for targeted liquid chromatography mass spectrometry proteomics on limited amounts of enriched cell populations.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Martin; Tomas Rejtar; Stephen A Martin
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Quantitation in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics.

Authors:  Waltraud X Schulze; Björn Usadel
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 26.379

3.  Antibody-free, targeted mass-spectrometric approach for quantification of proteins at low picogram per milliliter levels in human plasma/serum.

Authors:  Tujin Shi; Thomas L Fillmore; Xuefei Sun; Rui Zhao; Athena A Schepmoes; Mahmud Hossain; Fang Xie; Si Wu; Jong-Seo Kim; Nathan Jones; Ronald J Moore; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolić; Jacob Kagan; Karin D Rodland; Tao Liu; Keqi Tang; David G Camp; Richard D Smith; Wei-Jun Qian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Proteomic analysis of mouse astrocytes and their secretome by a combination of FASP and StageTip-based, high pH, reversed-phase fractionation.

Authors:  Dohyun Han; Jonghwa Jin; Jongmin Woo; Hophil Min; Youngsoo Kim
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 5.  Complexity reduction of clinical samples for routine mass spectrometric analysis.

Authors:  Cédric Mesmin; Jan van Oostrum; Bruno Domon
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Quantification of cardiovascular biomarkers in patient plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution.

Authors:  Hasmik Keshishian; Terri Addona; Michael Burgess; D R Mani; Xu Shi; Eric Kuhn; Marc S Sabatine; Robert E Gerszten; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips.

Authors:  Juri Rappsilber; Matthias Mann; Yasushi Ishihama
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  Comparative shotgun proteomics using spectral count data and quasi-likelihood modeling.

Authors:  Ming Li; William Gray; Haixia Zhang; Christine H Chung; Dean Billheimer; Wendell G Yarbrough; Daniel C Liebler; Yu Shyr; Robbert J C Slebos
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 9.  Isobaric labeling-based relative quantification in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Navin Rauniyar; John R Yates
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  MS-GF+ makes progress towards a universal database search tool for proteomics.

Authors:  Sangtae Kim; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

1.  Quantitative Proteomics of All 14 Renal Tubule Segments in Rat.

Authors:  Kavee Limbutara; Chung-Lin Chou; Mark A Knepper
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Quantitative kinase and phosphatase profiling reveal that CDK1 phosphorylates PP2Ac to promote mitotic entry.

Authors:  Isha Nasa; Lauren E Cressey; Thomas Kruse; Emil P T Hertz; Jiang Gui; Lee M Graves; Jakob Nilsson; Arminja N Kettenbach
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 3.  A Review on Quantitative Multiplexed Proteomics.

Authors:  Nishant Pappireddi; Lance Martin; Martin Wühr
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.164

4.  Anti-Chi3L1 antibody suppresses lung tumor growth and metastasis through inhibition of M2 polarization.

Authors:  Ji Eun Yu; In Jun Yeo; Dong Ju Son; Jaesuk Yun; Sang-Bae Han; Jin Tae Hong
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 7.449

Review 5.  Recent advances in mass spectrometry based clinical proteomics: applications to cancer research.

Authors:  Andrew Macklin; Shahbaz Khan; Thomas Kislinger
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.988

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.