Literature DB >> 27255126

Physiopathology and clinical considerations of laparoscopic surgery in the elderly.

Pietro Caglià1, Angelo Tracia2, Antonino Buffone3, Luca Amodeo4, Luciano Tracia5, Corrado Amodeo6, Massimiliano Veroux7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The marked improvements in medical technology and healthcare, lead an increasing number of elderly patients to take advantage of even complex surgical. Recently, laparoscopic surgery has been accepted as a minimally invasive treatment to reduce the morbidity after conventional surgery, and a number of studies have demonstrated the feasibility of laparoscopy with significant advantages also in the elderly. On the other side, the laparoscopic procedure has some drawbacks, including prolonged operation time and impact of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on circulatory and respiratory dynamics. This paper will review the physiopathological implications of laparoscopy, as well as the current literature concerning the most common laparoscopic procedures that are increasingly performed in elderly patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the current literature was performed using the search engines EMBASE and PubMed to identify all studies reporting the physiopathological implications of laparoscopy in the elderly. The MeSH search terms used were "laparoscopy in the elderly", "physiopathology of laparoscopy", and "pneumoperitoneum". Multiple combinations of the keywords and MeSH terms were used with particular reference to elderly patients.
RESULTS: Although laparoscopy is minimally invasive in its dissection techniques, the increased physiologic demands present particular challenges among elderly patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy and its safety in the elderly patients remains a challenge and the evaluation of this approach is therefore mandatory. Although many studies have demonstrated the applicability and advantages of the laparoscopy also in the geriatric population, with low rates of morbidity and mortality, in elderly patients undergoing general surgical procedures the physiologic demands of laparoscopy should be carefully considered.
Copyright © 2016 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Laparoscopy; Surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27255126     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  6 in total

1.  Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Georgina Baines; Natalia Price; Helen Jefferis; Rufus Cartwright; Simon R Jackson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Quantifying and Statistically Modeling Residual Pneumoperitoneum after Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Study.

Authors:  Venkat M Ramakrishnan; Tilo Niemann; Philipp Maletzki; Edward Guenther; Teodora Bujaroska; Olanrewaju Labulo; Zhufeng Li; Juliette Slieker; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Kurt Lehmann; Antonio Nocito; Lukas J Hefermehl
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23

3.  Realization of improved outcomes following liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma patients aged 75 years and older.

Authors:  Jong Man Kim; Jinsoo Rhu; Sang Yun Ha; Gyu-Seong Choi; Choon Hyuck David Kwon; Gaabsoo Kim; Jae-Won Joh
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 4.  Perioperative Pulmonary Support of the Elderly.

Authors:  Catherine Entriken; Timothy A Pritts
Journal:  Curr Geriatr Rep       Date:  2021-11-09

5.  "Slim-Mesh" Technique for Giant Ventral Hernia.

Authors:  Silvio Alen Canton; Claudio Pasquali
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.789

Review 6.  Recruitment Maneuver to Reduce Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shuaijie Pei; Wei Wei; Kai Yang; Yiyi Yang; Yu Pan; Jinrui Wei; Shanglong Yao; Haifa Xia
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.964

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.