Nicholas D Spence1, Samantha Wells2, Kathryn Graham3, Julie George4. 1. Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA nspence@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Social and Epidemiological Research Department, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, London, Ontario, Canada Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada School of Psychology, Deakin University, Australia. 3. Social and Epidemiological Research Department, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, London, Ontario, Canada Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Psychology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia. 4. Social and Epidemiological Research Department, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, London, Ontario, Canada Mental Health and Addiction Services, Kettle & Stony Point Health Services, Kettle & Stony Point First Nation, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Racial discrimination is a social determinant of health for First Nations people. Cultural resilience has been regarded as a potentially positive resource for social outcomes. Using a compensatory model of resilience, this study sought to determine if cultural resilience (compensatory factor) neutralized or offset the detrimental effect of racial discrimination (social risk factor) on stress (outcome). METHODS: Data were collected from October 2012 to February 2013 (N = 340) from adult members of the Kettle and Stony Point First Nation community in Ontario, Canada. The outcome was perceived stress; risk factor, racial discrimination; and compensatory factor, cultural resilience. Control variables included individual (education, sociability) and family (marital status, socioeconomic status) resilience resources and demographics (age and gender). The model was tested using sequential regression. RESULTS: The risk factor, racial discrimination, increased stress across steps of the sequential model, while cultural resilience had an opposite modest effect on stress levels. In the final model with all variables, age and gender were significant, with the former having a negative effect on stress and women reporting higher levels of stress than males. Education, marital status, and socioeconomic status (household income) were not significant in the model. The model had R(2) = 0.21 and adjusted R(2) = 0.18 and semipartial correlation (squared) of 0.04 and 0.01 for racial discrimination and cultural resilience, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, cultural resilience compensated for the detrimental effect of racial discrimination on stress in a modest manner. These findings may support the development of programs and services fostering First Nations culture, pending further study.
OBJECTIVE: Racial discrimination is a social determinant of health for First Nations people. Cultural resilience has been regarded as a potentially positive resource for social outcomes. Using a compensatory model of resilience, this study sought to determine if cultural resilience (compensatory factor) neutralized or offset the detrimental effect of racial discrimination (social risk factor) on stress (outcome). METHODS: Data were collected from October 2012 to February 2013 (N = 340) from adult members of the Kettle and Stony Point First Nation community in Ontario, Canada. The outcome was perceived stress; risk factor, racial discrimination; and compensatory factor, cultural resilience. Control variables included individual (education, sociability) and family (marital status, socioeconomic status) resilience resources and demographics (age and gender). The model was tested using sequential regression. RESULTS: The risk factor, racial discrimination, increased stress across steps of the sequential model, while cultural resilience had an opposite modest effect on stress levels. In the final model with all variables, age and gender were significant, with the former having a negative effect on stress and women reporting higher levels of stress than males. Education, marital status, and socioeconomic status (household income) were not significant in the model. The model had R(2) = 0.21 and adjusted R(2) = 0.18 and semipartial correlation (squared) of 0.04 and 0.01 for racial discrimination and cultural resilience, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, cultural resilience compensated for the detrimental effect of racial discrimination on stress in a modest manner. These findings may support the development of programs and services fostering First Nations culture, pending further study.
Authors: Julie A Baldwin; Betty G Brown; Heidi A Wayment; Ramona Antone Nez; Kathleen M Brelsford Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Sarah L Szanton; Joseph M Rifkind; Joy G Mohanty; Edgar R Miller; Roland J Thorpe; Eneka Nagababu; Elissa S Epel; Alan B Zonderman; Michele K Evans Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2012-12
Authors: Meg Gerrard; Michelle L Stock; Megan E Roberts; Frederick X Gibbons; Ross E O'Hara; Chih-Yuan Weng; Thomas A Wills Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2012-04-30
Authors: Khadijah Breathett; Mario Sims; Marie Gross; Elizabeth A Jackson; Emily J Jones; Ana Navas-Acien; Herman Taylor; Kevin L Thomas; Barbara V Howard Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Charles Marks; Jennifer L Pearson; María Luisa Zúñiga; Natasha Martin; Dan Werb; Laramie R Smith Journal: Stress Health Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: S Duke Han; Melissa Lamar; Debra Fleischman; Namhee Kim; David A Bennett; Tené T Lewis; Konstantinos Arfanakis; Lisa L Barnes Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 3.224
Authors: Joanna O Obaoye; Aprill Z Dawson; Madhuli Thakkar; Joni S Williams; Leonard E Egede Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 3.514