Literature DB >> 27254231

Patient experience and quality of urologic cancer surgery in US hospitals.

Joseph D Shirk1, Hung-Jui Tan1,2, Jim C Hu3, Christopher S Saigal1, Mark S Litwin1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Care interactions as perceived by patients and families are increasingly viewed as both an indicator and lever for high-value care. To promote patient-centeredness and motivate quality improvement, payers have begun tying reimbursement with related measures of patient experience. Accordingly, the authors sought to determine whether such data correlate with outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for genitourinary cancer.
METHODS: The authors used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) data from 2009 through 2011. They identified hospital admissions for cancer-directed prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy, and measured mortality, hospitalization length, discharge disposition, and complications. Mixed effects models were used to compare the likelihood of selected outcomes between the top and bottom tercile hospitals adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.
RESULTS: Among a sample of 46,988 encounters, the authors found small differences in patient age, race, income, comorbidity, cancer type, receipt of minimally invasive surgery, and procedure acuity according to HCAHPS tercile (P<.001). Hospital characteristics also varied with respect to ownership, teaching status, size, and location (P<.001). Compared with patients treated in low-performing hospitals, patients treated in high-performing hospitals less often faced prolonged hospitalization (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.92) or nursing-sensitive complications (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.99). No difference was found with regard to inpatient mortality, other complications, and discharge disposition (P>.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample and HCAHPS data, the authors found a limited association between patient experience and surgical outcomes. For urologic cancer surgery, patient experience may be optimally viewed as an independent quality domain rather than a mechanism with which to improve surgical outcomes. Cancer 2016;122:2571-8.
© 2016 American Cancer Society. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bladder neoplasm; kidney neoplasm; patient satisfaction; prostate neoplasm; surgical quality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27254231     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

1.  Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores and gynecologic oncology surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Joseph A Dottino; Weiguo He; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Shuangshuang Fu; Karen H Lu; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Association Between Patient Satisfaction and Short-Term Outcomes After Major Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Deborah R Kaye; Caroline R Richardson; Zaojun Ye; Lindsey A Herrel; Chad Ellimoottil; David C Miller
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  The Patient-Healthcare Professional Relationship and Communication in the Oncology Outpatient Setting: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anne Prip; Kirsten Alling Møller; Dorte Lisbet Nielsen; Mary Jarden; Marie-Helene Olsen; Anne Kjaergaard Danielsen
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.592

4.  Needs of Patients with Prostate Cancer for Home Care.

Authors:  Ayse Cal; Seher Zengin; Ilknur Aydin Avci
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

Review 5.  Factors influencing cancer patients' experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review.

Authors:  Saleh A Alessy; Mohammed Alhajji; Janette Rawlinson; Matthew Baker; Elizabeth A Davies
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-21

Review 6.  Use of Patient-Reported Data within the Acute Healthcare Context: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kathryn Kynoch; Mary Ameen; Mary-Anne Ramis; Hanan Khalil
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Patient-related Factors and Perioperative Outcomes Are Associated with Self-Reported Hospital Rating after Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Elbert J Mets; Michael R Mercier; Ari S Hilibrand; Michelle C Scott; Arya G Varthi; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.755

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.