Literature DB >> 27253680

The role of visual representations in college students' understanding of mathematical notation.

Natsuki Atagi1, Melissa DeWolf1, James W Stigler1, Scott P Johnson1.   

Abstract

Developing understanding of fractions involves connections between nonsymbolic visual representations and symbolic representations. Initially, teachers introduce fraction concepts with visual representations before moving to symbolic representations. Once the focus is shifted to symbolic representations, the connections between visual representations and symbolic notation are considered to be less useful, and students are rarely asked to connect symbolic notation back to visual representations. In 2 experiments, we ask whether visual representations affect understanding of symbolic notation for adults who understand symbolic notation. In a conceptual fraction comparison task (e.g., Which is larger, 5 / a or 8 / a?), participants were given comparisons paired with accurate, helpful visual representations, misleading visual representations, or no visual representations. The results show that even college students perform significantly better when accurate visuals are provided over misleading or no visuals. Further, eye-tracking data suggest that these visual representations may affect performance even when only briefly looked at. Implications for theories of fraction understanding and education are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27253680      PMCID: PMC5016224          DOI: 10.1037/xap0000090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  9 in total

1.  The influence of sharing on children's initial concept of division.

Authors:  Sarah Squire; Peter Bryant
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2002-01

2.  Magnitude comparison with different types of rational numbers.

Authors:  Melissa DeWolf; Margaret A Grounds; Miriam Bassok; Keith J Holyoak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The impact of fraction magnitude knowledge on algebra performance and learning.

Authors:  Julie L Booth; Kristie J Newton; Laura K Twiss-Garrity
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-10-11

4.  Early fraction calculation ability.

Authors:  K S Mix; S C Levine; J Huttenlocher
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1999-01

5.  When three is less than two: early developments in children's understanding of fractional quantities.

Authors:  C Sophian; D Garyantes; C Chang
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1997-09

6.  Modeling discrete and continuous entities with fractions and decimals.

Authors:  Monica Rapp; Miriam Bassok; Melissa DeWolf; Keith J Holyoak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2014-11-17

7.  Strategy use and strategy choice in fraction magnitude comparison.

Authors:  Lisa K Fazio; Melissa DeWolf; Robert S Siegler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  From rational numbers to algebra: separable contributions of decimal magnitude and relational understanding of fractions.

Authors:  Melissa DeWolf; Miriam Bassok; Keith J Holyoak
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2015-03-02

9.  Conceptual structure and the procedural affordances of rational numbers: relational reasoning with fractions and decimals.

Authors:  Melissa DeWolf; Miriam Bassok; Keith J Holyoak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-11-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.