Siri Kvam1, Catrine Lykkedrang Kleppe2, Inger Hilde Nordhus3, Anders Hovland4. 1. Sogndal Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic, Division of Medicine, District General Hospital of Førde, postboks 1000, 6807 Førde, Norway. Electronic address: siri.kvam@gmail.com. 2. Child Habilitation Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Sørlandet Hospital, Norway. 3. Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway. 4. Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway; Solli District Psychiatric Centre (DPS), Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examines the efficacy of physical exercise as treatment for unipolar depression, both as an independent intervention and as an adjunct intervention to antidepressant medication. METHODS: We searched PsycINFO, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Sports Discus for articles published until November 2014. Effect sizes were computed with random effects models. The main outcome was reduction in depressive symptoms or remission. RESULTS: A total of 23 RCTs and 977 participants were included. Physical exercise had a moderate to large significant effect on depression compared to control conditions (g=-0.68), but the effect was small and not significant at follow-up (g=-0.22). Exercise compared to no intervention yielded a large and significant effect size (g=-1.24), and exercise had a moderate and significant effect compared to usual care (g=-0.48). The effects of exercise when compared to psychological treatments or antidepressant medication were small and not significant (g=-0.22 and g=-0.08, respectively). Exercise as an adjunct to antidepressant medication yielded a moderate effect (g=-0.50) that trended toward significance. LIMITATIONS: Use of the arms with the largest clinical effect instead of largest dose may have overestimated the effect of exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Physical exercise is an effective intervention for depression. It also could be a viable adjunct treatment in combination with antidepressants.
BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examines the efficacy of physical exercise as treatment for unipolar depression, both as an independent intervention and as an adjunct intervention to antidepressant medication. METHODS: We searched PsycINFO, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Sports Discus for articles published until November 2014. Effect sizes were computed with random effects models. The main outcome was reduction in depressive symptoms or remission. RESULTS: A total of 23 RCTs and 977 participants were included. Physical exercise had a moderate to large significant effect on depression compared to control conditions (g=-0.68), but the effect was small and not significant at follow-up (g=-0.22). Exercise compared to no intervention yielded a large and significant effect size (g=-1.24), and exercise had a moderate and significant effect compared to usual care (g=-0.48). The effects of exercise when compared to psychological treatments or antidepressant medication were small and not significant (g=-0.22 and g=-0.08, respectively). Exercise as an adjunct to antidepressant medication yielded a moderate effect (g=-0.50) that trended toward significance. LIMITATIONS: Use of the arms with the largest clinical effect instead of largest dose may have overestimated the effect of exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Physical exercise is an effective intervention for depression. It also could be a viable adjunct treatment in combination with antidepressants.
Authors: Claire-Dominique Walker; Kevin G Bath; Marian Joels; Aniko Korosi; Muriel Larauche; Paul J Lucassen; Margaret J Morris; Charlis Raineki; Tania L Roth; Regina M Sullivan; Yvette Taché; Tallie Z Baram Journal: Stress Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 3.493
Authors: Ana M Abrantes; Claire E Blevins; Cynthia L Battle; Jennifer P Read; Alan L Gordon; Michael D Stein Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2017-07-08
Authors: Garcia Ashdown-Franks; Joseph Firth; Rebekah Carney; Andre F Carvalho; Mats Hallgren; Ai Koyanagi; Simon Rosenbaum; Felipe B Schuch; Lee Smith; Marco Solmi; Davy Vancampfort; Brendon Stubbs Journal: Sports Med Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Lisa A Uebelacker; Marie A Sillice; Gary Epstein-Lubow; Cynthia L Battle; Bradley Anderson; Celeste Caviness; Ivan W Miller; Ana M Abrantes Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-03-07 Impact factor: 2.226