OBJECTIVE: The Availability, Responsiveness, and Continuity (ARC) organizational intervention is designed to improve community-based youth mental health services by aligning organizational priorities with 5 principles of effective service organizations (i.e., mission driven, results oriented, improvement directed, relationship centered, participation based). This study assessed the effect of the ARC intervention on youth outcomes and the mediating role of organizational priorities as a mechanism linking the ARC intervention to outcomes. METHOD: Fourteen community-based mental health agencies in a midwestern metropolis along with 475 clinicians and 605 youth (ages 5-18) served by those agencies were randomly assigned to the 3-year ARC intervention or control condition. The agencies' priorities were measured with the ARC Principles Questionnaire (APQ) completed by clinicians at the end of the intervention. Youth outcomes were measured as total problems in psychosocial functioning described by their caregivers using the Shortform Assessment for Children (SAC) at 6 monthly intervals. RESULTS: The rate of improvement in youths' psychosocial functioning in agencies assigned to the ARC condition was 1.6 times the rate of improvement in agencies assigned to the control condition, creating a standardized difference in functioning of d = .23 between the 2 groups at the 6-month follow-up. The effect on youth outcomes was fully mediated by the alignment of organizational priorities described in the 5 ARC principles (d = .21). CONCLUSION: The ARC organizational intervention improves youth outcomes by aligning organizational priorities with the 5 ARC principles. The findings suggest that organizational priorities explain why some community mental health agencies are more effective than others. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The Availability, Responsiveness, and Continuity (ARC) organizational intervention is designed to improve community-based youth mental health services by aligning organizational priorities with 5 principles of effective service organizations (i.e., mission driven, results oriented, improvement directed, relationship centered, participation based). This study assessed the effect of the ARC intervention on youth outcomes and the mediating role of organizational priorities as a mechanism linking the ARC intervention to outcomes. METHOD: Fourteen community-based mental health agencies in a midwestern metropolis along with 475 clinicians and 605 youth (ages 5-18) served by those agencies were randomly assigned to the 3-year ARC intervention or control condition. The agencies' priorities were measured with the ARC Principles Questionnaire (APQ) completed by clinicians at the end of the intervention. Youth outcomes were measured as total problems in psychosocial functioning described by their caregivers using the Shortform Assessment for Children (SAC) at 6 monthly intervals. RESULTS: The rate of improvement in youths' psychosocial functioning in agencies assigned to the ARC condition was 1.6 times the rate of improvement in agencies assigned to the control condition, creating a standardized difference in functioning of d = .23 between the 2 groups at the 6-month follow-up. The effect on youth outcomes was fully mediated by the alignment of organizational priorities described in the 5 ARC principles (d = .21). CONCLUSION: The ARC organizational intervention improves youth outcomes by aligning organizational priorities with the 5 ARC principles. The findings suggest that organizational priorities explain why some community mental health agencies are more effective than others. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Sonja K Schoenwald; Jason E Chapman; Kelly Kelleher; Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood; John Landsverk; Jack Stevens; Charles Glisson; Jennifer Rolls-Reutz Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2007-11-14
Authors: Charles Glisson; Anthony Hemmelgarn; Philip Green; Nathaniel J Williams Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: John R Weisz; Lauren S Krumholz; Lauren Santucci; Kristel Thomassin; Mei Yi Ng Journal: Annu Rev Clin Psychol Date: 2015 Impact factor: 18.561
Authors: Christopher P Bonafide; Rui Xiao; Amanda C Schondelmeyer; Amy R Pettit; Patrick W Brady; Christopher P Landrigan; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Zuleyha Cidav; Halley Ruppel; Naveen Muthu; Nathaniel J Williams; Enrique Schisterman; Canita R Brent; Kimberly Albanowski; Rinad S Beidas Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2022-10-21 Impact factor: 7.960