| Literature DB >> 27252833 |
Sarah M Mitchell1, Laura K Muehlbauer2, Steven Freedberg2.
Abstract
Despite the presence of reproductive barriers between species, interspecific gene introgression has been documented in a range of natural systems. Comparing patterns of genetic introgression in biparental versus matrilineal markers can potentially reveal sex-specific barriers to interspecific gene flow. Hybridization has been documented in the freshwater turtles Graptemys geographica and G. pseudogeographica, whose ranges are largely sympatric. Morphological differentiation between the species is restricted to females, with female G. geographica possessing large heads and jaws compared to the narrow heads of G. pseudogeographica females. If hybrid females are morphologically intermediate, they may be less successful at exploiting parental feeding niches, thereby limiting the introgression of maternally inherited, but not biparental, molecular markers. We paired sequence data with stable isotope analysis and examined sex-specific genetic introgression and trophic differentiation in sympatric populations of G. geographica and G. pseudogeographica. We observed introgression from G. pseudogeographica into G. geographica at three nuclear loci, but not at the mitochondrial locus. Analysis of ∂(15)N and ∂(13)C was consistent with species differences in trophic positioning in females, but not males. These results suggest that ecological divergence in females may reduce the opportunity for gene flow in this system.Entities:
Keywords: Graptemys; hybridization; introgression; stable isotope analysis; turtles
Year: 2016 PMID: 27252833 PMCID: PMC4870212 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Frequency of species‐specific nuclear and mitochondrial genotypes found in Graptemys geographica and G. pseudogeographica
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| ODC (nuclear) | ||
| Genotype | Frequency | % |
|
| 59 | 84.3 |
|
| 11 | 15.7 |
|
| 0 | 0 |
Figure 1Trophic position (±1 SE) was significantly elevated in female Graptemys geographica compared to female G. pseudogeographica, male G. pseudogeographica, and male G. geographica. No species difference was observed in males. Different letters above bars denote statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).
| ID | Species | Genotype | Collecting location |
|---|---|---|---|
| 272 | G | AA | Ohio, USA |
| 59643 | G | AA | Alabama, USA |
| 27818 | G | AA | Kentucky, USA |
| 23397 | G | AA | Indiana, USA |
| 59527 | G | AA | Illinois, USA |
| 59646 | G | AA | Illinois, USA |
| 60056 | G | AA | Iowa, USA |
| 60057 | G | AA | Iowa, USA |
| 59524 | G | AA | Missouri, USA |
| 59657 | G | AA | Missouri, USA |
| 59658 | G | AA | Missouri, USA |
| 59666 | G | AA | Missouri, USA |
| 59667 | G | AA | Missouri, USA |
| 59668 | G | AA | Missouri, USA |
| 60001 | G | AG | Missouri, USA |
| 23217 | P | GG | Tennessee, USA |
| 23218 | P | GG | Tennessee, USA |
| 59639 | P | GG | Tennessee, USA |
| 59999 | P | GG | Illinois, USA |
| 11150 | P | GG | No locality data |
| 646 | P | GG | Minnesota, USA |
| Gp6 | P | GG | Minnesota, USA |
| LK | O | GG | Indiana, USA |
| 23347 | O | GG | Tennessee, USA |
| 59635 | O | GG | Illinois, USA |
| 52064 | O | GG | Wisconsin, USA |
| 35214 | O | GG | Arkansas, USA |
Denotes sequence downloaded from GenBank.