| Literature DB >> 27252704 |
Amany A Ghazy1, Nour M El-Etreby2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal gynecological malignancies and the fifth leading cause of cancer deaths among women. The high mortality rate is largely attributed to its diagnosis in advanced stages. Poor prognosis of ovarian cancer is usually due to the lack of specific or effective screening and diagnostic methods for identifying early-stage disease. AIM: Our study aimed to study the role of HLA-DP, HLA-DQ, and ICAM-1 SNPs in diagnosis and/or prognosis of ovarian tumors. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The current study was conducted on 60 patients with ovarian tumors (benign, borderline, and malignant) and 20 healthy volunteers. Genotyping of HLA-DP rs3077, HLA-DQ rs3920, and ICAM-1 rs1437 SNPs was done using 5' nuclease assay.Entities:
Keywords: HLA-DP; HLA-DQ; ICAM-1; SNP; ovarian cancer
Year: 2016 PMID: 27252704 PMCID: PMC4877515 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Correlation between fluorescence signals and allele present in a sample.
| VIC-dye fluorescence only | Homozygous for allele 1 |
| FAM-dye fluorescence only | Homozygous for allele 2 |
| Both VIC- and FAM-dye fluorescence | Allele 1–allele-2 heterozygous |
Figure 1Real-time PCR pictures displaying (A) expression of HLA-DP rs3077GG, HLA-DQ rs3920 GG, or ICAM-1 rs1437 TT, (B) expression of HLA-DP rs3077AA, HLA-DQ rs3920 AA, or ICAM-1 rs1437 CC, and (C) heterozygous expression of both alleles “HLA-DP rs3077AG, HLA-DQ rs3920 AG, or ICAM-1 rs1437 CT.”
Distribution of age and menstrual state in the studied groups.
| • <40 | 4 | 20.0 | 4 | 20.0 | 3 | 15.0 | 9 | 45.0 | 0.06 |
| • 40–50 | 6 | 30.0 | 4 | 20.0 | 3 | 15.0 | 5 | 25.0 | |
| • 50–60 | 6 | 30.0 | 8 | 40.0 | 6 | 30.0 | 4 | 20.0 | |
| • 60–70 | 4 | 20.0 | 4 | 20.0 | 8 | 40.0 | 2 | 10.0 | |
| • Pre-menopause | 13 | 65.0 | 8 | 40.0 | 10 | 50.0 | 16 | 80.0 | 0.047 |
| • Menopause | 7 | 35.0 | 12 | 60.0 | 10 | 50.0 | 4 | 20.0 | |
MCP, Mont Carlo exact probability.
*.
Distribution of HLA-DP-rs3077, HLA-DQ-rs3920, and ICAM-1 rs1437 alleles in the studied groups.
| • AA | 18 | 90.0 | 20 | 100.0 | 20 | 100.0 | 8 | 40.0 | 0.126 |
| • AG | 2 | 10.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 12 | 60.0 | |
| • AG | 2 | 10.0 | 12 | 60.0 | 6 | 30.0 | 15 | 75.0 | 0.003 |
| • GG | 18 | 90.0 | 8 | 40.0 | 14 | 70.0 | 5 | 25.0 | |
| • CC | 2 | 10.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 14 | 70.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.001 |
| • CT | 7 | 35.0 | 16 | 80.0 | 5 | 25.0 | 8 | 40.0 | |
| • TT | 11 | 55.0 | 4 | 20.0 | 1 | 5.0 | 12 | 60.0 | |
MCP, Mont Carlo exact probability.
*.
Distribution of the studied alleles in ovarian cancer patients and healthy controls.
| • AA | 58 | 96.7 | 8 | 40.0 | 43.5 (8.2–57.3) |
| • AG | 2 | 3.3 | 12 | 60.0 | 1 |
| • AG | 20 | 33.3 | 15 | 75.0 | 1 |
| • GG | 40 | 66.7 | 5 | 25.0 | 6.0 (1.9–18.8) |
| • CC | 16 | 26.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 25.0 (1.4–125.6) |
| • CT | 28 | 46.7 | 8 | 40.0 | 2.6 (1.0–7.8) |
| • TT | 16 | 26.7 | 12 | 60.0 | 1 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
*Significant (.
Figure 2Distribution of the studied alleles in ovarian tumors’ patients and healthy controls.
Relation between menstrual status and the studied alleles.
| Pre-menopause | |||||||
| HLA-DP | AA | 29 | 93.5 | 4 | 25.0 | 0.001 | |
| AG | 2 | 6.5 | 12 | 75.0 | |||
| HLA-DQ | AG | 7 | 22.6 | 11 | 68.8 | 0.002 | |
| GG | 24 | 77.4 | 5 | 31.3 | |||
| ICAM1 | CC | 8 | 25.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.067 | |
| CT | 11 | 35.5 | 6 | 37.5 | |||
| TT | 12 | 38.7 | 10 | 62.5 | |||
| Menopause | |||||||
| HLA-DP | AA | 29 | 100.0 | 4 | 100.0 | – | |
| AG | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| HLA-DQ | AG | 13 | 44.8 | 4 | 100.0 | 0.038 | |
| GG | 16 | 55.2 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| ICAM1 | CC | 8 | 27.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.159 | |
| CT | 17 | 58.6 | 2 | 50.0 | |||
| TT | 4 | 13.8 | 2 | 50.0 | |||
*Significant (.