Literature DB >> 27252433

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Malunions of the Proximal Part of the Humerus (Type-4 Fracture Sequelae).

Patric Raiss1, T Bradley Edwards2, Philippe Collin3, Thomas Bruckner4, Felix Zeifang4, Markus Loew5, Pascal Boileau6, Gilles Walch7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal part of the humerus in combination with posttraumatic arthritis is challenging. The reported results of treatment with anatomic shoulder arthroplasty are disappointing. The aim of this multicenter study was to analyze the clinical and radiographic results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of posttraumatic sequelae of the proximal part of the humerus with malunion of the tuberosities.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter study of 42 patients (42 shoulders) with the diagnosis of posttraumatic sequelae of the proximal part of the humerus with malunions of the tuberosities who were treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty between 2000 and 2010. The mean age at the time of arthroplasty was 68 years (range, 27 to 83 years; median, 70 years). The dominant side was treated in 24 cases. The mean clinical and radiographic follow-up was 4 years (range, 2 to 13 years; median, 3.5 years). The Constant score including subgroups, shoulder flexion, rotation motion, and radiographs of the affected shoulders were analyzed before the surgical procedure and at the time of the latest follow-up. Patients categorized their postoperative results as very good, good, satisfactory, or unsatisfactory.
RESULTS: The mean Constant score increased from 19.7 points (range, 0 to 52 points) preoperatively to 54.9 points (range, 21 to 83 points) postoperatively (p < 0.0001). All of the subgroups of the Constant score also increased, as did active shoulder flexion and external rotation (all p < 0.0001). In one case, loosening of the humeral and glenoid components occurred. Scapular notching was present in 22 shoulders (52%) and was grade 1 in 12 cases, grade 2 in 4 cases, grade 3 in 2 cases, and grade 4 in 4 cases. Complications occurred in 4 patients (9.5%). Eighteen patients (43%) rated their result as very good, 19 (45%) rated their result as good, 4 (10%) rated their result as satisfactory, and one (2%) rated the result as unsatisfactory.
CONCLUSIONS: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a viable treatment option for type-4 proximal humeral fracture sequelae that cannot otherwise be treated with anatomic shoulder replacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27252433     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  15 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.

Authors:  Eric T Ricchetti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Primary Versus Salvage Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick A Nelson; Changyow C Kwan; Vehniah K Tjong; Michael A Terry; Ujash Sheth
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2020-09-15

3.  Chronic posterior dislocation of shoulder.

Authors:  Ravi Mittal; Siddharth Jain; Shivanand Gamanagatti
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 4.  The Role of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures with Fracture Sequelae: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  James Holton; Tahir Yousri; George Arealis; Ofer Levy
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2017-02-24

5.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Filippo Familiari; Jorge Rojas; Mahmut Nedim Doral; Gazi Huri; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-02-28

6.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae: How the initial fracture treatment influences the outcomes of joint replacement.

Authors:  Fernando Santana; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Pau Guirro; Carlos Torrens
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 1.511

Review 7.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years or younger: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mikaël Chelli; Lucas Lo Cunsolo; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Jean-François Gonzalez; Peter Domos; Nicolas Bronsard; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-09-11

8.  PHILOS Plate Plus Oblique Insertion of Autologous Fibula for 2-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures With Medial Column Disruption: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Ying Shu; Meiji Chen; Weiguang Yu; Zhe Ge; Hao Hu; Xinchao Zhang; Xianshang Zeng; Xiangzhen Liu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-04

Review 9.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Benjamin T Gaal; Alexander M Roche; Surena Namdari; Brian M Grawe; Macy Lawler; Stewart Dalton; Joseph J King; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-07

10.  Patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty for failed nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fracture have low implant survival and low patient-reported outcomes: 837 cases from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry.

Authors:  Inger Mechlenburg; Sigrid Rasmussen; Ditte Unbehaun; Alexander Amundsen; Jeppe Vejlgaard Rasmussen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.