Literature DB >> 27252207

Migratory monarchs wintering in California experience low infection risk compared to monarchs breeding year-round on non-native milkweed.

Dara A Satterfield1, Francis X Villablanca2, John C Maerz3, Sonia Altizer4.   

Abstract

Long-distance migration can lower infection risk for animal populations by removing infected individuals during strenuous journeys, spatially separating susceptible age classes, or allowing migrants to periodically escape from contaminated habitats. Many seasonal migrations are changing due to human activities including climate change and habitat alteration. Moreover, for some migratory populations, sedentary behaviors are becoming more common as migrants abandon or shorten their journeys in response to supplemental feeding or warming temperatures. Exploring the consequences of reduced movement for host-parasite interactions is needed to predict future responses of animal pathogens to anthropogenic change. Monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) and their specialist protozoan parasite Ophryocystis elektroscirrha (OE) provide a model system for examining how long-distance migration affects infectious disease processes in a rapidly changing world. Annual monarch migration from eastern North America to Mexico is known to reduce protozoan infection prevalence, and more recent work suggests that monarchs that forego migration to breed year-round on non-native milkweeds in the southeastern and south central Unites States face extremely high risk of infection. Here, we examined the prevalence of OE infection from 2013 to 2016 in western North America, and compared monarchs exhibiting migratory behavior (overwintering annually along the California coast) with those that exhibit year-round breeding. Data from field collections and a joint citizen science program of Monarch Health and Monarch Alert showed that infection frequency was over nine times higher for monarchs sampled in gardens with year-round milkweed as compared to migratory monarchs sampled at overwintering sites. Results here underscore the importance of animal migrations for lowering infection risk and motivate future studies of pathogen transmission in migratory species affected by environmental change.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27252207     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icw030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  10 in total

Review 1.  Food for contagion: synthesis and future directions for studying host-parasite responses to resource shifts in anthropogenic environments.

Authors:  Sonia Altizer; Daniel J Becker; Jonathan H Epstein; Kristian M Forbes; Thomas R Gillespie; Richard J Hall; Dana M Hawley; Sonia M Hernandez; Lynn B Martin; Raina K Plowright; Dara A Satterfield; Daniel G Streicker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The Role of Experiments in Monarch Butterfly Conservation: A Review of Recent Studies and Approaches.

Authors:  Victoria M Pocius; Ania A Majewska; Micah G Freedman
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 3.  Responses of migratory species and their pathogens to supplemental feeding.

Authors:  Dara A Satterfield; Peter P Marra; T Scott Sillett; Sonia Altizer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 6.671

4.  Sedentary songbirds maintain higher prevalence of haemosporidian parasite infections than migratory conspecifics during seasonal sympatry.

Authors:  Samuel P Slowinski; Adam M Fudickar; Alex M Hughes; Raeann D Mettler; Oxana V Gorbatenko; Garth M Spellman; Ellen D Ketterson; Jonathan W Atwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Multiple transmission routes sustain high prevalence of a virulent parasite in a butterfly host.

Authors:  Ania A Majewska; Stuart Sims; Anna Schneider; Sonia Altizer; Richard J Hall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Exposure to Non-Native Tropical Milkweed Promotes Reproductive Development in Migratory Monarch Butterflies.

Authors:  Ania A Majewska; Sonia Altizer
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Crowding does not affect monarch butterflies' resistance to a protozoan parasite.

Authors:  Wajd Alaidrous; Scott M Villa; Jacobus C de Roode; Ania A Majewska
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Population genetics of a recent range expansion and subsequent loss of migration in monarch butterflies.

Authors:  William B Hemstrom; Micah G Freedman; Myron P Zalucki; Santiago R Ramírez; Michael R Miller
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 6.622

9.  Leveraging genomics to understand threats to migratory birds.

Authors:  Brenda Larison; Alec R Lindsay; Christen Bossu; Michael D Sorenson; Joseph D Kaplan; David C Evers; James Paruk; Jeffrey M DaCosta; Thomas B Smith; Kristen Ruegg
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Monarchs Reared in Winter in California Are Not Large Enough to Be Migrants. Comment on James et al. First Population Study on Winter Breeding Monarch Butterflies, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in the Urban South Bay of San Francisco, California. Insects 2021, 12, 946.

Authors:  Andrew K Davis
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.769

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.