Literature DB >> 27251794

Do maize models capture the impacts of heat and drought stresses on yield? Using algorithm ensembles to identify successful approaches.

Zhenong Jin1, Qianlai Zhuang1,2,3, Zeli Tan1, Jeffrey S Dukes3,4,5, Bangyou Zheng6, Jerry M Melillo7.   

Abstract

Stresses from heat and drought are expected to increasingly suppress crop yields, but the degree to which current models can represent these effects is uncertain. Here we evaluate the algorithms that determine impacts of heat and drought stress on maize in 16 major maize models by incorporating these algorithms into a standard model, the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM), and running an ensemble of simulations. Although both daily mean temperature and daylight temperature are common choice of forcing heat stress algorithms, current parameterizations in most models favor the use of daylight temperature even though the algorithm was designed for daily mean temperature. Different drought algorithms (i.e., a function of soil water content, of soil water supply to demand ratio, and of actual to potential transpiration ratio) simulated considerably different patterns of water shortage over the growing season, but nonetheless predicted similar decreases in annual yield. Using the selected combination of algorithms, our simulations show that maize yield reduction was more sensitive to drought stress than to heat stress for the US Midwest since the 1980s, and this pattern will continue under future scenarios; the influence of excessive heat will become increasingly prominent by the late 21st century. Our review of algorithms in 16 crop models suggests that the impacts of heat and drought stress on plant yield can be best described by crop models that: (i) incorporate event-based descriptions of heat and drought stress, (ii) consider the effects of nighttime warming, and (iii) coordinate the interactions among multiple stresses. Our study identifies the proficiency with which different model formulations capture the impacts of heat and drought stress on maize biomass and yield production. The framework presented here can be applied to other modeled processes and used to improve yield predictions of other crops with a wide variety of crop models.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator; crop model comparison; drought stress; heat stress; maize; yield

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27251794     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  5 in total

1.  Projected climate and agronomic implications for corn production in the Northeastern United States.

Authors:  Rishi Prasad; Stephan Kpoti Gunn; Clarence Alan Rotz; Heather Karsten; Greg Roth; Anthony Buda; Anne M K Stoner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Potassium Application Improves Grain Yield and Alleviates Drought Susceptibility in Diverse Maize Hybrids.

Authors:  Sami Ul-Allah; Muhammad Ijaz; Ahmad Nawaz; Abdul Sattar; Ahmad Sher; Muhammad Naeem; Umbreen Shahzad; Umar Farooq; Farukh Nawaz; Khalid Mahmood
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-07

3.  Excessive rainfall leads to maize yield loss of a comparable magnitude to extreme drought in the United States.

Authors:  Yan Li; Kaiyu Guan; Gary D Schnitkey; Evan DeLucia; Bin Peng
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Environment Characterization in Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) by Modeling Water-Deficit and Heat Patterns in the Great Plains Region, United States.

Authors:  Ana J P Carcedo; Laura Mayor; Paula Demarco; Geoffrey P Morris; Jane Lingenfelser; Carlos D Messina; Ignacio A Ciampitti
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 5.  Translating High-Throughput Phenotyping into Genetic Gain.

Authors:  José Luis Araus; Shawn C Kefauver; Mainassara Zaman-Allah; Mike S Olsen; Jill E Cairns
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 18.313

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.