Literature DB >> 27251314

Characterization of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in the Yucatan Micropig Using Transcranial and Epidural Stimulation.

Francisco D Benavides1, Andrea J Santamaria1, Nikita Bodoukhin1, Luis G Guada1, Juan P Solano2, James D Guest1,3.   

Abstract

Yucatan micropigs have brain and spinal cord dimensions similar to humans and are useful for certain spinal cord injury (SCI) translational studies. Micropigs are readily trained in behavioral tasks, allowing consistent testing of locomotor loss and recovery. However, there has been little description of their motor and sensory pathway neurophysiology. We established methods to assess motor and sensory cortical evoked potentials in the anesthetized, uninjured state. We also evaluated epidurally evoked motor and sensory stimuli from the T6 and T9 levels, spanning the intended contusion injury epicenter. Response detection frequency, mean latency and amplitude values, and variability of evoked potentials were determined. Somatosensory evoked potentials were reliable and best detected during stimulation of peripheral nerve and epidural stimulation by referencing the lateral cortex to midline Fz. The most reliable hindlimb motor evoked potential (MEP) occurred in tibialis anterior. We found MEPs in forelimb muscles in response to thoracic epidural stimulation likely generated from propriospinal pathways. Cranially stimulated MEPs were easier to evoke in the upper limbs than in the hindlimbs. Autopsy studies revealed substantial variations in cortical morphology between animals. This electrophysiological study establishes that neurophysiological measures can be reliably obtained in micropigs in a time frame compatible with other experimental procedures, such as SCI and transplantation. It underscores the need to better understand the motor control pathways, including the corticospinal tract, to determine which therapeutics are suitable for testing in the pig model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corticospinal; epidural; evoked potentials; porcine; propriospinal; spinal cord injury

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27251314     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2016.4511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  5 in total

Review 1.  Combined neuromodulatory approaches in the central nervous system for treatment of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Brian R Noga; James D Guest
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Spinal Cord Contusion: A Comparative Study on Small and Large Animal Models.

Authors:  Yana Mukhamedshina; Iliya Shulman; Sergei Ogurcov; Alexander Kostennikov; Elena Zakirova; Elvira Akhmetzyanova; Alexander Rogozhin; Galina Masgutova; Victoria James; Ruslan Masgutov; Igor Lavrov; Albert Rizvanov
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-12-01

3.  How to generate graded spinal cord injuries in swine - tools and procedures.

Authors:  Mark Züchner; Manuel J Escalona; Lena Hammerlund Teige; Evangelos Balafas; Lili Zhang; Nikolaos Kostomitsopoulos; Jean-Luc Boulland
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 5.758

4.  Somatosensory and transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring in a porcine model for experimental procedures.

Authors:  Sven Maier; Ulrich Goebel; Sonja Krause; Christoph Benk; Martin A Schick; Hartmut Buerkle; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Fabian A Kari; Jakob Wollborn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Feasibility of non-invasive recording of somatosensory evoked potential in pigs.

Authors:  Guillaume L Hoareau; Angela Peters; David Hilgart; Marta Iversen; Gregory Clark; Matthew Zabriskie; Viola Rieke; Candace Floyd; Lubdha Shah
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2022-03-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.