Literature DB >> 27249561

Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives.

Nora P Castañeda-Álvarez1,2, Colin K Khoury1,3, Harold A Achicanoy1, Vivian Bernau1, Hannes Dempewolf4, Ruth J Eastwood5, Luigi Guarino4, Ruth H Harker5, Andy Jarvis1,6, Nigel Maxted2, Jonas V Müller5, Julian Ramirez-Villegas1,6,7, Chrystian C Sosa1, Paul C Struik3, Holly Vincent2, Jane Toll4.   

Abstract

The wild relatives of domesticated crops possess genetic diversity useful for developing more productive, nutritious and resilient crop varieties. However, their conservation status and availability for utilization are a concern, and have not been quantified globally. Here, we model the global distribution of 1,076 taxa related to 81 crops, using occurrence information collected from biodiversity, herbarium and gene bank databases. We compare the potential geographic and ecological diversity encompassed in these distributions with that currently accessible in gene banks, as a means to estimate the comprehensiveness of the conservation of genetic diversity. Our results indicate that the diversity of crop wild relatives is poorly represented in gene banks. For 313 (29.1% of total) taxa associated with 63 crops, no germplasm accessions exist, and a further 257 (23.9%) are represented by fewer than ten accessions. Over 70% of taxa are identified as high priority for further collecting in order to improve their representation in gene banks, and over 95% are insufficiently represented in regard to the full range of geographic and ecological variation in their native distributions. The most critical collecting gaps occur in the Mediterranean and the Near East, western and southern Europe, Southeast and East Asia, and South America. We conclude that a systematic effort is needed to improve the conservation and availability of crop wild relatives for use in plant breeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27249561     DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2016.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Plants        ISSN: 2055-0278            Impact factor:   15.793


  58 in total

1.  Ancient genomes reveal early Andean farmers selected common beans while preserving diversity.

Authors:  Emiliano Trucchi; Andrea Benazzo; Martina Lari; Sanne Boessenkool; Roberto Papa; Giorgio Bertorelle; Alice Iob; Stefania Vai; Laura Nanni; Elisa Bellucci; Elena Bitocchi; Francesca Raffini; Chunming Xu; Scott A Jackson; Verónica Lema; Pilar Babot; Nurit Oliszewski; Adolfo Gil; Gustavo Neme; Catalina Teresa Michieli; Monica De Lorenzi; Lucio Calcagnile; David Caramelli; Bastiaan Star; Hugo de Boer
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 15.793

2.  Agrobiodiversity: The living library.

Authors:  Karl Gruber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Global plant diversity as a reservoir of micronutrients for humanity.

Authors:  Aoife Cantwell-Jones; Jenny Ball; David Collar; Mauricio Diazgranados; Ruben Douglas; Félix Forest; Julie Hawkins; Melanie-Jayne R Howes; Tiziana Ulian; Bapu Vaitla; Samuel Pironon
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 15.793

4.  Matches and mismatches between the global distribution of major food crops and climate suitability.

Authors:  Lucie Mahaut; Samuel Pironon; Jean-Yves Barnagaud; François Bretagnolle; Colin K Khoury; Zia Mehrabi; Ruben Milla; Charlotte Phillips; Loren H Rieseberg; Cyrille Violle; Delphine Renard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Drying banana seeds for ex situ conservation.

Authors:  Simon Kallow; Manuela Garcia Zuluaga; Natalia Fanega Sleziak; Bayu Nugraha; Arne Mertens; Steven B Janssens; Lavernee Gueco; Michelle Lyka Valle-Descalsota; Tuong Dang Vu; Dang Toan Vu; Loan Thi Li; Filip Vandelook; John B Dickie; Pieter Verboven; Rony Swennen; Bart Panis
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Paralogs and off-target sequences improve phylogenetic resolution in a densely-sampled study of the breadfruit genus (Artocarpus, Moraceae).

Authors:  Elliot M Gardner; Matthew G Johnson; Joan T Pereira; Aida Shafreena Ahmad Puad; Deby Arifiani; Norman J Wickett; Nyree J C Zerega
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Comparative analysis of repetitive sequences among species from the potato and the tomato clades.

Authors:  Paola Gaiero; Magdalena Vaio; Sander A Peters; M Eric Schranz; Hans de Jong; Pablo R Speranza
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 8.  Development and use of chromosome segment substitution lines as a genetic resource for crop improvement.

Authors:  Divya Balakrishnan; Malathi Surapaneni; Sukumar Mesapogu; Sarla Neelamraju
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Study of the genetic and phenotypic variation among wild and cultivated clary sages provides interesting avenues for breeding programs of a perfume, medicinal and aromatic plant.

Authors:  Camille Chalvin; Stéphanie Drevensek; Christel Chollet; Françoise Gilard; Edita M Šolić; Michel Dron; Abdelhafid Bendahmane; Adnane Boualem; Amandine Cornille
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus.

Authors:  Rainer W Bussmann; Narel Y Paniagua Zambrana; Shalva Sikharulidze; Zaal Kikvidze; David Kikodze; David Tchelidze; Manana Khutsishvili; Ketevan Batsatsashvili; Robbie E Hart
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.