| Literature DB >> 27248178 |
Jianjun Lu1,2, Yanhong Wang3, Miansheng Yan1, Pinning Feng1, Linjing Yuan4, Yuesu Cai1,5, Xin Xia2, Min Liu1, Jinmei Luo1,3, Laisheng Li1.
Abstract
The overall survival time of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not improved dramatically in recent decades. An important reason is the lacking of valuable biomarkers. Haptoglobin was reported to have activities of anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, autoimmune and tumor angiogenesis. However its potential role as a tumor biomarker was not well recognized. We used an immunoturbidimetry method to measure serum haptoglobin levels in 205 NSCLC patients, and 210 normal healthy controls. We found that serum haptoglobin levels were significantly elevated in NSCLC patients compared with normal healthy controls (1.985±1.039 mg/mLvs. 0.922 ± 0.495 mg/mL, respectively, P < 0.0001). Higher serum haptoglobin levels were associated with advanced TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for serum haptoglobin was 0.809 (95% CI: 0.767-0.852) at a specificity of 0.881 and sensitivity of 0.639. The optimal cut-off value of haptoglobin was 1.495 mg/mL for discriminating NSCLC from normal healthy controls. Kaplan-Meier log rank analysis revealed that the higher serum haptoglobin levels group had a poorer overall survival compared with lower haptoglobin group (the median survival was 12.0 weeks , 26.0 weeks, respectively, P < 0.01). Further univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that serum haptoglobin was an independent risk factor of prognosis of NSCLC patients (P < 0.01, P = 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, our study suggests that serum haptoglobin may act as useful clinical serological biomarkers in progression and prognostic evaluation in NSCLC.Entities:
Keywords: NSCLC; biomarker; haptoglobin; prognosis; progression
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27248178 PMCID: PMC5173094 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Clinicopathological variables of NSCLC patients and normal healthy controls (n, %)
| Variables | NSCLC cases ( | Normal controls ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 61.6 ± 9.8 | 60.6 ± 11.1 |
| Gender ( | ||
| Male | 134 (65.4) | 120 (57.1) |
| Female | 71 (34.6) | 90 (42.9) |
| Smoking status ( | ||
| Non-smoker | 58 (28.3) | 92 (43.8) |
| Smoker | 147 (71.7) | 118 (56.2) |
| Histology | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 116 (56.6) | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 76 (37.1) | |
| Other | 13 (6.3) | |
| TNM stage | ||
| I+II | 61 (29.8) | |
| III+IV | 144 (70.2) | |
| Differentiation | ||
| Well | 46 (22.4) | |
| Moderate and low | 144 (70.3) | |
| Unknown | 15 (7.3) | |
| Lymph node metastases | ||
| Negative | 75 (36.6) | |
| Positive | 130 (63.4) | |
| Distant metastases | ||
| Negative | 155 (75.6) | |
| Positive | 50 (24.4) |
Figure 1Comparison of serum haptoglobin levels (A) between normal healthy controls and NSCLC patients; (B) in normal healthy controls and NSCLC patients at different TNM stage; (C) in NSCLC patients with and without lymph node metastasis; (D) in NSCLC patients with and without distant metastasis.
Association between serum Haptoglobin levels and characteristical variables in NSCLC patients
| Variables | Number | Haptoglobin (mg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Y) | |||
| ≤ 60 | 121 | 1.976 ± 1.098 | 0.9240 |
| > 60 | 84 | 1.996 ± 0.972 | |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 134 | 1.971 ± 1.029 | 0.6071 |
| Female | 71 | 2.014 ± 1.066 | |
| Smoking status | |||
| Non-smoker | 58 | 1.889 ± 0.920 | 0.6772 |
| Smoker | 147 | 2.023 ± 1.084 | |
| Histology | |||
| Adenocarcinoma | 116 | 2.009 ± 1.023 | 0.8547 |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 76 | 1.964 ± 1.045 | |
| TNM stage | |||
| I + II | 61 | 1.675 ± 0.881 | 0.0138 |
| III + IV | 144 | 2.117 ± 1.076 | |
| Differentiation | |||
| Well | 46 | 1.964 ± 0.954 | 0.8732 |
| Moderate and low | 144 | 1.993 ± 1.052 | |
| Lymph node metastases | |||
| Negative | 74 | 1.719 ± 0.917 | 0.0356 |
| Positive | 131 | 2.136 ± 1.077 | |
| Distant metastases | |||
| Negative | 155 | 1.867 ± 1.005 | 0.0004 |
| Positive | 50 | 2.354 ± 1.069 |
Figure 2ROC analyses for serum haptoglobin to differentiate (A) NSCLC from normal healthy controls; (B) NSCLC patients with Lym-Neg from Nor; (C) NSCLC patients with Lym-Pos from Nor; (D) NSCLC patients with Lym-Pos from Lym-Neg. Nor, Normal healthy controls, Lym-Neg, Lymph node metastasis negative, Lym-Pos, Lymph node metastasis positive.
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier survival curves of NSCLC patients
Overall survival rate of NSCLC patients with high- and low- serum haptoglobin levels group.
Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis of variables considered for overall survival rates of NSCLC patients
| Variables | Category | Univariate | HR | Multivariate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | > 60 vs. < 60 years | 0.45 | 1.07 | 0.52–2.18 | 0.37 |
| Gender | male vs. female | 0.63 | 0.95 | 0.58–1.68 | 0.26 |
| Smoking status | smoker vs. non-smoker | 0.32 | 1.18 | 0.34–2.13 | 0.34 |
| TNM stage | III + IV vs. I + II | < 0.01 | 3.38 | 1.83–8.63 | < 0.01 |
| Differentiation | well vs. moderate + low | 0.08 | 0.88 | 0.44–1.52 | 0.33 |
| Lymph node metastases | positive vs. negative | < 0.01 | 2.89 | 1.31–6.84 | < 0.01 |
| Distant metastases | positive vs. negative | < 0.01 | 4.53 | 2.01–7.94 | < 0.01 |
| Serum haptoglobin levels | high vs. low | < 0.01 | 2.45 | 1.47–4.49 | 0.01 |
Abbreviations: HR = hazards ratio; CI = confidence interval.