Jin Kyoung Lee1, Hye Lim Jang1, Byung Ho Kang2, Kyung-Suk Lee3, Yong-Sung Choi1, Kye Shik Shim1, Jae Woo Lim4, Chong-Woo Bae1, Sung-Hoon Chung1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea . 2. Department of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea . 3. Department of Pediatrics, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea . 4. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejon, Korea .
Abstract
The Pediatric Growth Chart (2007) is used as a standard reference to evaluate weight and height percentiles of Korean children and adolescents. Although several previous studies provided a useful reference range of newborn birth weight (BW) by gestational age (GA), the BW reference analyzed by sex and plurality is not currently available. Therefore, we aimed to establish a national reference range of neonatal BW percentiles considering GA, sex, and plurality of newborns in Korea. The raw data of all newborns (470,171 in 2010, 471,265 in 2011, and 484,550 in 2012) were analyzed. Using the Korean Statistical Information Service data (2010-2012), smoothed percentile curves (3(rd)-97(th)) by GA were created using the lambda-mu-sigma method after exclusion and the data were distinguished by all live births, singleton births, and multiple births. In the entire cohort, male newborns were heavier than female newborns and singletons were heavier than twins. As GA increased, the difference in BW between singleton and multiples increased. Compared to the previous data published 10 years ago in Korea, the BW of newborns 22-23 gestational weeks old was increased, whereas that of others was smaller. Other countries' data were also compared and showed differences in BW of both singleton and multiple newborns. We expect this updated data to be utilized as a reference to improve clinical assessments of newborn growth.
The Pediatric Growth Chart (2007) is used as a standard reference to evaluate weight and height percentiles of Korean children and adolescents. Although several previous studies provided a useful reference range of newborn birth weight (BW) by gestational age (GA), the BW reference analyzed by sex and plurality is not currently available. Therefore, we aimed to establish a national reference range of neonatal BW percentiles considering GA, sex, and plurality of newborns in Korea. The raw data of all newborns (470,171 in 2010, 471,265 in 2011, and 484,550 in 2012) were analyzed. Using the Korean Statistical Information Service data (2010-2012), smoothed percentile curves (3(rd)-97(th)) by GA were created using the lambda-mu-sigma method after exclusion and the data were distinguished by all live births, singleton births, and multiple births. In the entire cohort, male newborns were heavier than female newborns and singletons were heavier than twins. As GA increased, the difference in BW between singleton and multiples increased. Compared to the previous data published 10 years ago in Korea, the BW of newborns 22-23 gestational weeks old was increased, whereas that of others was smaller. Other countries' data were also compared and showed differences in BW of both singleton and multiple newborns. We expect this updated data to be utilized as a reference to improve clinical assessments of newborn growth.
Worldwide data of the significance of newborn birth weight (BW) have been studied since the 1970s (1). By analyzing newborn BW by gestational age (GA), we can evaluate fetal growth, intrauterine growth restriction (which has high perinatal mortality), and epidemiologic data comparing fetal growth and chronic adulthood disease. The newborn's condition immediately after birth can be predicted accordingly. From the long-term perspective, a nation's public health system could be established (23). Since 2000, several studies have provided a reference range of newborn BW by GA in Korea. However, some have limitations, including: an insufficient sample size based on 18,427 newborns in 2003; the Korean Statistical Information Service data (2001-2003, 1,509,763 persons; 2000–2004, 2,585,516 persons) were based on the previous 10 years; and recent data based on Korean Statistical Information Service data (2008-2012) did not exclude the common error showing the double humped curve that appears most frequently in the big data analysis and made only singleton references (4567).It has recently become popular in Korea to marry at a later age, which could increase the number of elderly gravida and high-risk pregnancies, eventually increasing premature birth rates. In addition, in vitro fertilization is associated with an increase in multiple pregnancies. There has been a recent increase in inter-racial infants in Korea (8910). These changes have a strong influence on BW. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to establish a new national reference range of neonatal BW percentiles considering the GA, sex, and plurality of newborns in Korea.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For this study, we used the Korean Statistical Information Service data (2010.01–2012.12) of a total of 1,425,986 newborns. The raw data of all newborns (470,171 in 2010, 471,265 in 2011, and 484,550 in 2012) were analyzed. Our results were based on 1,422,890 births after exclusions. Newborns with unknown BW (n = 2,100), unknown GA (n = 2,514), or a GA < 22 weeks (n = 73) or > 42 weeks (n = 297) were excluded. Some of the exclusions (n = 1,888) are duplicated. The GA referred to the interval, in completed weeks, between the first day of the mother's last menstrual period and the delivery date. Therefore, the GA of 40 weeks means 40 weeks plus 0–6 days. BW was measured to the nearest 10 g.Fig. 1 represented the percentile curves of BW for GA based on the Korean Statistical Information Service's raw data after exclusions. It included the estimated error data of 28–32 weeks' gestation. The histogram of BW of 28–32 weeks' gestation before smoothing showed a double humped curve as reported by Lee (6). Both humps are normal distributions with the estimated truth (left) and error values (right).
Fig. 1
Percentile curves [3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97th] of birth weight for gestational age based on the raw data. %, percentile.
Percentile curves [3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97th] of birth weight for gestational age based on the raw data. %, percentile.This report used the Finite Gaussian mixture model, which is a convex combination of two or more probability density functions that was enabled to correct the error and represent the normal distribution curve (1112). The lambda-mu-sigma (LMS) method, a way of obtaining normalized growth curves, was developed by Cole and Green (13), and it was expected that the data could be normalized using a powerful transformation that changes raw data into a standard deviation Z-score. The LMS method calculates asymmetrical parameters by the Box-Cox transformation to be normal. Here it estimated the three parameters of the Box-Cox transformation of the measurement distribution (14). The three parameters are constrained to change smoothly as the covariate changes.The LMS methods were analyzed by Stata version 12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Moreover, all graphs were made using GraphPad Prism software (ver. 6.05, GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The SPSS for Windows (version 18.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the data input, processing, and analysis. The smoothed data were represented by the BW percentile curves. The curves appeared at intervals of one week by gestation and separated into all live births, singlet births, and multiple births. We also constructed separate curves and tables for male and female newborns for the 3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97th percentiles from 22 to 42 completed weeks based on smoothed estimated curves.Classification according to BW are as follows: extremely low birth weight (ELBW, BWs < 1,000 g) infants, very low birth weight (VLBW, BWs < 1,500 g) infants, low birth weight (LBW, BWs < 2,500 g) infants, normal birth weight (NBW, 2,500 ≤ BWs ≤ 3,999 g) infants, high birth weight (HBW, BWs > 4,000 g) infants.
RESULTS
Of all infants born between 2010 and 2012, there were 733,980 and 692,006 boys and girls, respectively, showing a gender ratio of 1.06, and there were 1,381,088 and 42,314 singleton and multiple births, respectively (Table 1). After assessing BW and GA for the 3-year period, extremely low BW infants and very low BW infants accounted for 0.24% and 0.62%, respectively, while premature birth infants born at < 37 weeks' gestation accounted for 6% of the total infant population (Table 2). Initially, data on 2,726 infants whose BW and GAs were unclear as well as those of 370 infants whose GA was ≤ 21 weeks or ≥ 43 weeks were excluded from the raw data of the National Statistical Office of South Korea. Subsequently, error data of 28–32 weeks' gestation were removed, followed by smoothing with the LMS method.
Table 1
Number of infants divided by infant sex and multiplicity before exclusions, 2010–2012
Demography parameters
Year
2010
2011
2012
Total
Sex
Male
242,901
242,121
248,958
733,980
Female
227,270
229,144
235,592
692,006
Male/female ratio
1.07
1.06
1.06
1.06
Multiplicity*
Singlet
455,309
457,171
468,608
1,381,088
Multiple
12,841
13,852
15,621
42,314
Multiple birth rate†
27.3
29.4
32.2
29.7
*Except unknown multiplicity.
†Per 1,000 live births.
Table 2
Distribution of births by birth weight and gestational period before exclusions, 2010-2012
Birth parameters
No. (%) of birth
By birth weight
ELBW infants
3,394 (0.24)
VLBW infants
8,789 (0.62)
LBW infants
74,054 (5.19)
NBW infants
1,300,902 (91.23)
HBW infants
48,930 (3.43)
Unknown
2,100 (0.15)
Total
1,425,986 (100)
By gestational period
Preterm infants
86,365 (6.06)
Term infants
1,333,242 (93.5)
Post-term infants
3,865 (0.27)
Unknown
2,514 (0.18)
Total
1,425,986 (100)
ELBW, extremely low birth weight; VLBW, very low birth weight; LBW, low birth weight; NBW, normal birth weight; HBW, high birth weight.
*Except unknown multiplicity.†Per 1,000 live births.ELBW, extremely low birth weight; VLBW, very low birth weight; LBW, low birth weight; NBW, normal birth weight; HBW, high birth weight.All infants were classified according to gestation regardless of singleton or multiple birth, and data on the 3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97th percentiles are presented in Tables 3 (male) and 4 (female). Data on boys and girls born by singleton and multiple births are presented in Tables 5678. The BW percentile curves after smoothing singleton births are presented in Fig. 2A and 2B, while the BW percentile curves of multiple births are presented in Fig. 3A and 3B. In the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentile graphs of singleton births, boys showed higher BW than those of girls in the total infant graphs at each GA (Fig. 2C). Multiple-birth infants also showed a pattern similar to that of singleton-birth infants. However, BW of boys and girls close to 40 weeks' gestation in the 10th percentile graph tended to be similar (Fig. 3C). When graphs of singleton- and multiple-birth male and female infants overlapped by GA, more differences in BW were seen between multiple- and singleton-birth infants as GA increased (Fig. 4).
Table 3
Smoothed 3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th (median), 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97th percentiles of birth weight (g) for 22–42 weeks' gestational age for all male infants
GP
No.
3rd Percentile
5th Percentile
10th Percentile
25th Percentile
50th Percentile
75th Percentile
90th Percentile
95th Percentile
97th Percentile
22
65
356
374
402
448
499
550
596
623
641
23
157
418
441
476
535
602
669
730
767
791
24
285
479
507
550
624
707
793
871
918
949
25
325
541
575
628
717
819
923
1,017
1,074
1,112
26
434
606
647
712
819
940
1,061
1,171
1,236
1,279
27
547
677
728
805
932
1,072
1,210
1,334
1,407
1,454
28
744
758
819
909
1,057
1,216
1,371
1,507
1,587
1,638
29
793
857
926
1,030
1,197
1,374
1,544
1,692
1,779
1,835
30
1,032
974
1,052
1,167
1,351
1,545
1,730
1,891
1,985
2,045
31
1,325
1,114
1,197
1,321
1,518
1,728
1,929
2,103
2,205
2,271
32
1,944
1,273
1,359
1,488
1,697
1,922
2,139
2,330
2,442
2,514
33
2,728
1,448
1,535
1,668
1,888
2,127
2,362
2,571
2,695
2,775
34
5,236
1,637
1,725
1,861
2,087
2,339
2,591
2,817
2,952
3,040
35
9,516
1,836
1,924
2,060
2,292
2,552
2,816
3,057
3,202
3,297
36
22,408
2,038
2,126
2,262
2,494
2,759
3,030
3,280
3,431
3,530
37
67,989
2,237
2,323
2,458
2,688
2,953
3,226
3,479
3,633
3,735
38
188,256
2,422
2,506
2,638
2,864
3,125
3,395
3,647
3,801
3,902
39
210,907
2,588
2,670
2,798
3,018
3,273
3,538
3,785
3,937
4,038
40
174,916
2,735
2,814
2,938
3,152
3,400
3,659
3,901
4,051
4,150
41
40,834
2,867
2,943
3,063
3,270
3,511
3,763
4,001
4,147
4,244
42
1,677
2,992
3,066
3,181
3,381
3,614
3,859
4,091
4,234
4,329
GP, gestational period.
Table 4
Smoothed 3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th (median), 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97th percentile birth weight (g) for 22–42 weeks' gestation for all female infants
GP
No.
3rdPercentile
5thPercentile
10thPercentile
25thPercentile
50thPercentile
75thPercentile
90thPercentile
95thPercentile
97thPercentile
22
62
349
361
381
419
467
523
582
622
650
23
123
409
425
452
500
563
635
710
760
795
24
240
467
488
521
583
661
750
841
901
943
25
328
523
549
592
668
764
871
978
1,047
1,095
26
379
582
614
667
761
875
1,000
1,122
1,200
1,252
27
493
646
686
751
864
998
1,140
1,275
1,359
1,415
28
674
720
770
848
981
1,134
1,291
1,437
1,525
1,583
29
643
810
869
961
1,114
1,285
1,457
1,612
1,705
1,766
30
892
919
987
1,090
1,261
1,449
1,635
1,801
1,900
1,964
31
1,013
1,051
1,125
1,238
1,423
1,627
1,828
2,008
2,114
2,183
32
1,561
1,204
1,281
1,400
1,598
1,817
2,035
2,231
2,348
2,423
33
2,198
1,371
1,451
1,575
1,784
2,018
2,254
2,469
2,598
2,682
34
4,213
1,553
1,635
1,762
1,979
2,226
2,479
2,711
2,851
2,943
35
7,659
1,746
1,828
1,958
2,181
2,437
2,702
2,948
3,098
3,197
36
18,226
1,943
2,026
2,156
2,381
2,642
2,914
3,167
3,323
3,426
37
56,714
2,137
2,220
2,350
2,574
2,835
3,108
3,363
3,520
3,624
38
163,877
2,319
2,400
2,528
2,749
3,006
3,274
3,526
3,681
3,784
39
197,141
2,484
2,563
2,688
2,904
3,155
3,417
3,662
3,813
3,913
40
184,907
2,627
2,705
2,827
3,038
3,282
3,536
3,774
3,921
4,017
41
47,541
2,756
2,832
2,951
3,157
3,394
3,641
3,871
4,012
4,106
42
1,888
2,878
2,952
3,068
3,269
3,499
3,738
3,961
4,097
4,188
GP, gestational period.
Table 5
Smoothed 3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th (median), 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97th percentile birth weight (g) for 22-42 weeks' gestation for singleton-birth male infants
GP
No.
3rd Percentile
5th Percentile
10th Percentile
25th Percentile
50th Percentile
75th Percentile
90th Percentile
95th Percentile
97th Percentile
22
27
356
378
411
462
516
566
610
635
652
23
82
417
443
483
547
616
684
743
777
800
24
162
478
508
555
634
720
806
882
928
958
25
205
541
577
633
726
830
935
1,030
1,087
1,124
26
278
609
652
718
828
951
1,074
1,186
1,252
1,296
27
375
683
734
812
942
1,084
1,225
1,351
1,426
1,475
28
538
766
827
920
1,070
1,232
1,390
1,529
1,611
1,664
29
604
865
936
1,043
1,213
1,394
1,568
1,719
1,808
1,865
30
793
985
1,065
1,184
1,372
1,571
1,760
1,924
2,020
2,081
31
1,003
1,128
1,215
1,342
1,546
1,761
1,966
2,143
2,247
2,313
32
1,338
1,295
1,384
1,518
1,733
1,963
2,184
2,377
2,491
2,563
33
1,974
1,482
1,571
1,708
1,931
2,174
2,412
2,623
2,748
2,828
34
3,830
1,681
1,770
1,907
2,136
2,389
2,642
2,869
3,005
3,093
35
7,105
1,888
1,976
2,112
2,342
2,602
2,865
3,106
3,251
3,345
36
17,178
2,093
2,179
2,313
2,543
2,805
3,074
3,321
3,472
3,571
37
60,877
2,287
2,371
2,503
2,730
2,990
3,259
3,509
3,662
3,762
38
186,011
2,464
2,546
2,675
2,897
3,153
3,419
3,667
3,820
3,920
39
210,574
2,619
2,698
2,824
3,040
3,291
3,553
3,797
3,948
4,048
40
174,769
2,753
2,830
2,952
3,163
3,408
3,664
3,905
4,053
4,152
41
40,813
2,873
2,948
3,066
3,271
3,510
3,761
3,997
4,144
4,241
42
1,674
2,987
3,060
3,174
3,373
3,606
3,851
4,084
4,228
4,324
GP, gestational period.
Table 6
Smoothed 3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th (median), 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97th percentile birth weight (g) for 22-42 weeks' gestation for singleton-birth female infants
GP
No.
3rd Percentile
5th Percentile
10th Percentile
25th Percentile
50th Percentile
75th Percentile
90th Percentile
95th Percentile
97th Percentile
22
28
354
366
387
426
477
540
609
658
694
23
69
412
428
455
506
572
652
738
798
841
24
139
467
488
522
586
669
766
869
938
987
25
230
520
546
590
670
771
886
1,003
1,080
1,133
26
270
575
609
664
762
883
1,015
1,145
1,228
1,284
27
329
636
679
747
866
1,007
1,156
1,297
1,385
1,443
28
505
710
763
846
987
1,147
1,311
1,461
1,553
1,612
29
496
802
865
962
1,124
1,303
1,481
1,641
1,736
1,798
30
661
916
988
1,098
1,278
1,474
1,666
1,837
1,938
2,003
31
743
1,056
1,135
1,254
1,449
1,661
1,869
2,052
2,161
2,231
32
1,069
1,220
1,302
1,427
1,634
1,861
2,085
2,286
2,405
2,482
33
1,466
1,401
1,485
1,614
1,830
2,071
2,313
2,531
2,662
2,748
34
2,888
1,595
1,680
1,810
2,033
2,285
2,542
2,777
2,920
3,013
35
5,316
1,797
1,881
2,013
2,238
2,497
2,764
3,012
3,163
3,262
36
13,186
1,999
2,082
2,212
2,437
2,698
2,969
3,223
3,379
3,481
37
49,484
2,191
2,272
2,401
2,623
2,881
3,151
3,405
3,561
3,664
38
161,640
2,365
2,444
2,570
2,788
3,041
3,306
3,555
3,709
3,811
39
196,832
2,516
2,594
2,717
2,930
3,177
3,436
3,678
3,828
3,927
40
184,778
2,646
2,723
2,843
3,051
3,292
3,544
3,779
3,924
4,020
41
47,525
2,762
2,837
2,955
3,159
3,394
3,639
3,868
4,009
4,102
42
1,882
2,871
2,945
3,061
3,260
3,490
3,729
3,951
4,088
4,178
GP, gestational period.
Table 7
Smoothed 3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th (median), 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97th percentile birth weight (g) for 22-40 weeks' gestation for multiple-birth male infants
GP
No.
3rd Percentile
5th Percentile
10th Percentile
25th Percentile
50th Percentile
75th Percentile
90th Percentile
95th Percentile
97th Percentile
22
19
368
386
413
457
506
554
597
622
638
23
41
426
449
485
544
608
670
725
758
779
24
76
478
509
556
632
713
791
859
899
925
25
77
531
570
629
723
822
916
998
1,045
1,076
26
111
588
637
708
821
938
1,049
1,144
1,199
1,234
27
147
657
714
797
928
1,063
1,190
1,299
1,362
1,402
28
185
742
806
900
1,047
1,198
1,340
1,462
1,533
1,578
29
173
848
918
1,020
1,180
1,345
1,500
1,634
1,711
1,760
30
228
973
1,046
1,155
1,325
1,501
1,667
1,809
1,892
1,944
31
316
1,114
1,190
1,303
1,480
1,665
1,840
1,991
2,078
2,134
32
545
1,264
1,341
1,456
1,640
1,833
2,017
2,176
2,269
2,328
33
743
1,415
1,493
1,611
1,801
2,003
2,197
2,366
2,465
2,529
34
1,396
1,564
1,643
1,764
1,960
2,171
2,376
2,555
2,661
2,729
35
2,401
1,705
1,786
1,910
2,112
2,332
2,547
2,737
2,850
2,922
36
5,206
1,828
1,912
2,039
2,249
2,479
2,706
2,908
3,028
3,106
37
7,081
1,925
2,012
2,145
2,367
2,612
2,855
3,073
3,203
3,287
38
2,197
1,989
2,082
2,226
2,465
2,731
2,997
3,236
3,379
3,472
39
301
2,026
2,127
2,284
2,547
2,841
3,136
3,402
3,562
3,666
40
120
2,048
2,159
2,331
2,620
2,946
3,275
3,573
3,753
3,870
GP, gestational period.
Table 8
Smoothed 3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th (median), 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97th percentile birth weight (g) for 22-40 weeks' gestation for multiple-birth female infants
GP
No.
3rd Percentile
5th Percentile
10th Percentile
25th Percentile
50th Percentile
75th Percentile
90th Percentile
95th Percentile
97th Percentile
22
15
350
365
389
429
472
515
554
577
591
23
34
410
430
461
512
567
621
670
698
717
24
65
467
493
532
595
664
732
792
827
850
25
80
525
556
603
681
766
850
924
968
996
26
79
587
623
680
773
875
977
1,068
1,122
1,157
27
144
657
700
765
874
994
1,113
1,221
1,285
1,326
28
149
737
787
862
987
1,124
1,259
1,380
1,451
1,498
29
135
830
887
973
1,113
1,265
1,413
1,544
1,622
1,672
30
216
938
1,001
1,097
1,251
1,416
1,576
1,716
1,799
1,851
31
260
1,063
1,131
1,233
1,399
1,575
1,745
1,894
1,982
2,038
32
479
1,201
1,272
1,379
1,552
1,739
1,920
2,079
2,172
2,232
33
725
1,343
1,416
1,527
1,709
1,905
2,097
2,266
2,366
2,430
34
1,317
1,489
1,564
1,678
1,866
2,071
2,273
2,451
2,557
2,626
35
2,332
1,630
1,707
1,824
2,018
2,231
2,441
2,629
2,740
2,812
36
5,028
1,760
1,839
1,960
2,161
2,382
2,601
2,798
2,914
2,990
37
7,217
1,869
1,951
2,077
2,287
2,519
2,750
2,957
3,080
3,160
38
2,213
1,955
2,042
2,176
2,399
2,646
2,893
3,115
3,248
3,334
39
287
2,021
2,114
2,258
2,498
2,765
3,032
3,273
3,418
3,511
40
100
2,076
2,176
2,331
2,590
2,880
3,171
3,433
3,591
3,694
GP, gestational period.
Fig. 2
Smoothed percentile curves of birth weight distribution by gestational age for singlet (A) male, (B) female, and (C) male + female populations. %ile, percentile.
Fig. 3
Smoothed percentile curves of birth weight distribution by gestational age for twin (A) male, (B) female, and (C) male + female populations. %ile, percentile.
Fig. 4
Comparison of singleton and multiple percentile curves of birth weight by gestational age for male and female infants. %ile, percentile.
GP, gestational period.GP, gestational period.GP, gestational period.GP, gestational period.GP, gestational period.GP, gestational period.Smoothed percentile curves of birth weight distribution by gestational age for singlet (A) male, (B) female, and (C) male + female populations. %ile, percentile.Smoothed percentile curves of birth weight distribution by gestational age for twin (A) male, (B) female, and (C) male + female populations. %ile, percentile.Comparison of singleton and multiple percentile curves of birth weight by gestational age for male and female infants. %ile, percentile.When BW of singleton-birth male and female infants were compared with other data in South Korea from 2000–2004 for the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentile graphs (6), the patterns were similar for 30–32 weeks, whereas the 10th percentile graph of the present study showed a lower mean BW before 30 weeks' gestation (Fig. 5A). In contrast, when twin male and female infants were compared in the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles, BW increased after 37 weeks' gestation compared to the data of 2000–2004 (Fig. 5B).
Fig. 5
Comparison of (A) singleton, (B) twin birth weight percentile curves for male and female infants among different study of Korean populations. %ile, percentile.
Comparison of (A) singleton, (B) twin birth weight percentile curves for male and female infants among different study of Korean populations. %ile, percentile.Graphs of data from 7,993,166 singleton-birth infants born in Brazil between 2003 and 2005 were compared with the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentile graphs; both boys and girls were heavier than singleton-birth infants in Brazil in the 10th percentile but lighter in the 90th percentile (Fig. 6) (15). Compared with data of 676,605 singleton births in Canada between 1994 and 1996 (16), Canadian infants were lighter or similar in BW until 36 weeks' gestation, but BW of Korean infants were much lower than those of Canadian infants after 36 weeks' gestation (Fig. 7). While BW of twins were higher than those of American and Taiwanese boys and girls, the gap decreased after 38 weeks' gestation (Fig. 8) (1718). In the American study, the fetal growth of each twin was estimated from regression curves fit to ultrasonographic fetal weight measurements, and the estimated data could have a bias.
Fig. 6
Comparison of singleton birth weight percentile curves of Brazil. %ile, percentile.
Fig. 7
Comparison of singleton birth weight percentile curves of Canada. %ile, percentile.
Fig. 8
Comparison of twin birth weight percentile curves of the United States (A) and Taiwan (B). %ile, percentile.
Comparison of singleton birth weight percentile curves of Brazil. %ile, percentile.Comparison of singleton birth weight percentile curves of Canada. %ile, percentile.Comparison of twin birth weight percentile curves of the United States (A) and Taiwan (B). %ile, percentile.
DISCUSSION
The most basic characteristic of babyhood is growth, and since abnormal growth may be a critical signal of disease, its evaluation is essential (19). Growth begins in the uterus, and BW, the starting point after birth, is an important index for quantifying uterine and later growth and related to complications including perinatal mortality and perinatal distress (20). BW is also related to the development of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and hypertension in adulthood (21). However, since infant BW is affected by both environmental and genetic factors, it is important to identify the percentile distribution of BW during pregnancy using recent data to evaluate infants (22). In fact, the reference BW of the 90th percentile, which was the reference for 30 weeks' gestation singleton births in the present study, was 1,924 g for boys and 1,837 g for girls. These weights were higher than those reported in Korea approximately 10 years previously (boys, 1,855 g; girls, 1,758 g). In addition, the reference BW were higher than those reported in the United States for 257,855 singleton births between 1998 and 2006 (boys, 1,761 g; girls, 1,693 g), and in Canada for 676,605 singleton births between 1994 and 1996 (boys, 1,837 g; girls 1,783 g). The reference BW for the 10th percentile at 40 weeks' gestation were 3,000 g for boys and 2,890 g for girls. These weights were higher than those in Korea 10 years previously (boys, 2,898 g; girls, 2,790 g) and those reported in the US (boys, 2,950 g; girls, 2,855 g) but were lower than those in a Canadian report (boys, 3,079 g; girls, 2,955 g) (61623).In this study, male singleton and multiple infants had higher BW than female infants at each GA. These findings are consistent with those of other studies. According to the report by Kramer et al. (16), the mean BW of male singletons is approximately 50 g heavier than that of female singletons at the 90th percentile at 30 weeks' gestation, increasing to 120 g heavier at the 10th percentile at 42 weeks' gestation. Roberts et al reported that the mean BW of male twins is approximately 100 g heavier than that of female twins at 27–29 weeks' gestation, increasing to 150 g heavier at 40 weeks' GA (24). Fetal growth is generally influenced by placental properties and the fetus's inherent growth potential. This observed gender-specific difference may be caused by gender-dependent differences in “sensitivity” to the placental and fetal tissue to fasting plasma glucose or weight gain–associated factors (25). The differences in BW between males and females reportedly differed less in multiples than in singletons (26). However, our study showed that this gender difference was almost the same within singleton and multiple births.Compared to singleton-birth infants, multiple-birth infants have limited growth within the uterus; therefore, the evaluation criteria for infant BW need to be changed depending on singleton or multiple births (17). The growth of twins and triplets is reportedly similar to that of singleton-birth infants until 32 and 29 weeks' gestation, respectively, after which point it differs from that of singleton-birth infants. In contrast, it has been reported that a difference in growth between singleton- and multiple-birth infants began to appear after 28 weeks since multiple-birth infants showed growth limitations after 28 weeks' gestation (2327). According to the report by Bleker et al. (26), the difference in BW between singletons twins at 39–40 weeks' gestation was 600 g. Our study showed a similar difference in BW between singletons and multiples until about 30 weeks' gestation, but as GA increased after 30 weeks, the difference was greater. As such, the mean BW of male singletons is approximately 460 g heavier than that of female singletons, while that of male multiples is 410 g heavier than that of female multiples at the 50th percentile at 40 weeks' gestation.We compared our new curve with previously published data on singleton (both sexes) and twin BW percentiles by GA in 2000–2004 in Korea. When the validation samples were categorized as small for GA (SGA; < 10th percentile of a standard BW curve for GA)/appropriate for GA (10th percentile ≤ appropriate for GA ≤ 90th percentile of a standard BW curve for GA)/large for GA (> 90th percentile of a standard BW curve for GA), the new curves had lower average weights at younger GA until 30–31 weeks and higher or similar average weights after 31 weeks on the SGA curve. The differences found between our new curves and previous curves may be explained in part by differences in the infants who were born in 2010–2012 versus those born in 2000–2004. These differences in BW distribution may be explained by multiple factors that influence BW in developed countries, such as smoking, low weight gain during pregnancy, low pre-pregnancy body mass index or demographic changes by increasing numbers of multicultural families in Korea (2829). On the contrary, the new curves had higher average weights at younger GA until 32–33 weeks and lower average weights after 33 weeks on the large for GA curve. Data from Statistics Korea reported that the percentages of HBW infants among total live births decreased over the years as follows: 6.7% (1993), 6.3% (1995), 5.1% (1997), 4.5% (2000), and 3.5% (2010). Between 1993 and 2010, the average BW of Korea was reduced from 3.31 kg in 1993 to 3.22 kg in 2010 by approximately 0.1 kg (30). Recent changes in percentages of HBW infants and average BW could help to explain why the new curves are shifted down in the older GA on the appropriate GA and large for GA curves. Compared with twin curves, our twin curve had similar average weights at < 37 weeks but higher weights at > 37 weeks. The reason for these differences is currently unknown and should be confirmed in further studies that include fetal outcome.Despite the fact that the total number of newborns in 2010 was lower than that in 2000, the number of multiple gestations increased from 10,723 in 2000 to 12,841 in 2010, while the multiple birth rate increased 1.6 times from 16.9 in 2000 to 27.3 in 2010 as results of the ovulation inducing agent related to artificial insemination and the increased use of in vitro fertilization (313233). Although multiples compared with singletons have higher mortality and morbidity rates, few studies have examined the BW of multiples in Korea (3435). In this study, we tried to establish the distribution of BW percentiles considering newborn plurality. However, the overall data of newborns by the Korean Statistical Information (2010–2012) have estimated errors at 28–32 weeks' gestation. The distribution curves represent the double humped curve. The estimated error data were located on the right, which means heavier newborns for GA. This is the limitation of the large data analysis, but this report removed errors using the Finite Gaussian mixture model.In this study, we established the new reference range of the neonatal BW percentiles considering GA, sex, and plurality of newborns in Korea. We expect the updated data to be utilized as a new Korean reference to improve clinical growth assessments in newborns.
Authors: S J Min; B Luke; B Gillespie; L Min; R B Newman; J G Mauldin; F R Witter; F A Salman; M J O'sullivan Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: R W Platt; M Abrahamowicz; M S Kramer; K S Joseph; L Mery; B Blondel; G Bréart; S W Wen Journal: Stat Med Date: 2001-12-15 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Anne C C Lee; Luke C Mullany; James M Tielsch; Joanne Katz; Subarna K Khatry; Steven C LeClerq; Ramesh K Adhikari; Shardaram R Shrestha; Gary L Darmstadt Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Hyun Sun Ko; Jeong Ha Wie; Sae Kyung Choi; In Yang Park; Yong-Gyu Park; Jong Chul Shin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eun Hye Park; Jung Sun Lee; Ye-Jee Kim; Seung Mi Lee; Jong Kwan Jun; Eun Bong Lee; Yong-Gil Kim Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 2.884
Authors: So Yeon Kim; Seung Mi Lee; Go Eun Kwon; Byoung Jae Kim; Ja Nam Koo; Ig Hwan Oh; Sun Min Kim; Sue Shin; Won Kim; Sae Kyung Joo; Errol R Norwitz; Young Mi Jung; Chan-Wook Park; Jong Kwan Jun; Man Ho Choi; Joong Shin Park Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 4.379