Literature DB >> 27247484

Retrieval of Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Technical Considerations.

James L Laws1, Robert J Lewandowski1, Robert K Ryu2, Kush R Desai1.   

Abstract

Placement of retrievable inferior vena cava filters has seen rapid growth since their introduction into clinical practice. When retrieved, these devices offer the notional benefit of temporary protection from pulmonary embolism related to lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, and mitigation of filter-related deep venous thrombosis. When promptly removed after the indication for mechanical prophylaxis is no longer present, standard endovascular retrieval techniques are frequently successful. However, the majority of these devices are left in place for extended periods of time, which has been associated with greater device-related complications when left in situ, and failure of standard techniques when retrieval is attempted. The development of advanced retrieval techniques has had a positive impact on retrieval of these embedded devices. In this article, technical considerations in the retrieval of such devices, with an emphasis on advanced techniques to facilitate retrieval of embedded devices, are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advanced retrieval techniques; interventional radiology; retrievable inferior vena cava filters

Year:  2016        PMID: 27247484      PMCID: PMC4862851          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1582119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0739-9529            Impact factor:   1.513


  17 in total

1.  Improving inferior vena cava filter retrieval rates: impact of a dedicated inferior vena cava filter clinic.

Authors:  Jeet Minocha; Ibrahim Idakoji; Ahsun Riaz; Jennifer Karp; Ramona Gupta; Howard B Chrisman; Riad Salem; Robert K Ryu; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Practice patterns in the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in a trauma population: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Thomas S Helling; Sumesh Kaswan; S Lee Miller; James F Tretter
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-12

3.  A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group.

Authors:  H Decousus; A Leizorovicz; F Parent; Y Page; B Tardy; P Girard; S Laporte; R Faivre; B Charbonnier; F G Barral; Y Huet; G Simonneau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Inferior vena cava filter retrieval: effectiveness and complications of routine and advanced techniques.

Authors:  Ramsey Al-Hakim; Stephen T Kee; Kristen Olinger; Edward W Lee; John M Moriarty; Justin P McWilliams
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Retrievable inferior vena cava filters: factors that affect retrieval success.

Authors:  Philipp Geisbüsch; James F Benenati; Constantino S Peña; Joseph Couvillon; Alex Powell; Ripal Gandhi; Shaun Samuels; Heiko Uthoff
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Initial experience using the rigid forceps technique to remove wall-embedded IVC filters.

Authors:  Allan Avery; Maximilian Stephens; Kendal Redmond; John Harper
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 1.735

8.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).

Authors:  William H Geerts; David Bergqvist; Graham F Pineo; John A Heit; Charles M Samama; Michael R Lassen; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Indications, complications, and management of inferior vena cava filters: the experience in 952 patients at an academic hospital with a level I trauma center.

Authors:  Shayna Sarosiek; Mark Crowther; J Mark Sloan
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Factors associated with failed retrieval of the Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter.

Authors:  Joel S Marquess; Charles T Burke; Ashley H Beecham; Robert G Dixon; Joseph M Stavas; Alan A Sag; Gary G Koch; Matthew A Mauro
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Vena Cava Filters: Toward Optimal Strategies for Filter Retrieval and Patients' Follow-Up.

Authors:  Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari; David C Rotzinger; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.