Literature DB >> 27247482

Providing Context: Medical Device Litigation and Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

Eric J Keller1, Robert L Vogelzang2.   

Abstract

Over the last few years, an increasing number of lawsuits have been filed involving inferior vena cava filters. This has prompted the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to centralize these lawsuits into two multidistrict litigations: one for Cook's filters and one for Bard's. Both sets of cases share similar questions of facts, in particular whether these filters' design and manufacturing practices made them unreasonably prone to serious complications. The resolution of these cases will add to a larger legal debate concerning how much legal protection the 1976 Medical Device Amendments should offer firms from tort liability. As a specialty that often relies on medical devices, it is not only important for interventional radiologists to have a general understanding of medical device litigation but also to reflect upon the approaches to informed consent regarding these devices.

Keywords:  IVC filter; informed consent; interventional radiology; medical device litigation

Year:  2016        PMID: 27247482      PMCID: PMC4862861          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1581086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0739-9529            Impact factor:   1.513


  2 in total

1.  The Medical Device Safety Act of 2009.

Authors:  Gregory D Curfman; Stephen Morrissey; Jeffrey M Drazen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Enduring and emerging challenges of informed consent.

Authors:  Christine Grady
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 91.245

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Informed consent in interventional radiology - are we doing enough?

Authors:  Akash Prashar; Saqib Butt; Davide Giuseppe Castiglione; Nadeem Shaida
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.629

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.