Literature DB >> 27247271

Are more responsive depression scales really superior depression scales?

Eiko I Fried1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27247271     DOI： 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN： 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Efficacy of new-generation antidepressants assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the gold standard clinician rating scale: A meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Michael P Hengartner; Janus C Jakobsen; Anders Sørensen; Martin Plöderl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Understanding personalized dynamics to inform precision medicine: a dynamic time warp analysis of 255 depressed inpatients.

Authors:  K Hebbrecht; M Stuivenga; T Birkenhäger; M Morrens; E I Fried; B Sabbe; E J Giltay
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Scalable Screening and Treatment Response Monitoring for Perinatal Depression in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Ahmed Waqas; Abid Malik; Najia Atif; Anum Nisar; Huma Nazir; Siham Sikander; Atif Rahman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.390
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.