AIMS: The purpose of this study was to analyse the efficacy and complication rates of the simultaneous hybrid procedure in a series of patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in a midterm follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-four consecutive patients (56 males, 59.7 ± 8.7 years) having undergone isolation of pulmonary veins (PVs) and posterior wall of left atrium (LA) by means of hybrid thoracoscopic ablation for symptomatic persistent (n = 21, 33%) and long-standing persistent AF (n = 43, 67%) were analysed. At a mean follow-up of 23.1 ± 14.1 months (median 21; range 6-57), the success rate without antiarrhythmic therapy was achieved in 67.2% of patients. Procedure-related complications were observed in 13 patients (20.3%) including 2 LA perforations (3.1%) requiring, respectively, conversion to sternotomy and small left-sided thoracotomy. The success rate did not significantly differ between persistent and long-standing persistent AF (respectively, 71.4 and 65.1%; P = 0.4). Patients with AF relapse during the blanking period were 4.60 times more likely to have AF recurrence after 3 months from the ablation procedure. CONCLUSION: The hybrid procedure yields promising results in the setting of both persistent and long-standing persistent AF after midterm follow-up, at the expense of a non-negligible rate of adverse events. Our findings need to be confirmed by further larger and prospective studies. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: The purpose of this study was to analyse the efficacy and complication rates of the simultaneous hybrid procedure in a series of patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in a midterm follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-four consecutive patients (56 males, 59.7 ± 8.7 years) having undergone isolation of pulmonary veins (PVs) and posterior wall of left atrium (LA) by means of hybrid thoracoscopic ablation for symptomatic persistent (n = 21, 33%) and long-standing persistent AF (n = 43, 67%) were analysed. At a mean follow-up of 23.1 ± 14.1 months (median 21; range 6-57), the success rate without antiarrhythmic therapy was achieved in 67.2% of patients. Procedure-related complications were observed in 13 patients (20.3%) including 2 LA perforations (3.1%) requiring, respectively, conversion to sternotomy and small left-sided thoracotomy. The success rate did not significantly differ between persistent and long-standing persistent AF (respectively, 71.4 and 65.1%; P = 0.4). Patients with AF relapse during the blanking period were 4.60 times more likely to have AF recurrence after 3 months from the ablation procedure. CONCLUSION: The hybrid procedure yields promising results in the setting of both persistent and long-standing persistent AF after midterm follow-up, at the expense of a non-negligible rate of adverse events. Our findings need to be confirmed by further larger and prospective studies. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Vincent Umbrain; Christian Verborgh; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Carlo de Asmundis; Pedro Brugada; Mark La Meir Journal: Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev Date: 2017-12
Authors: Cinzia Monaco; Antonio Sorgente; Robbert Ramak; Gian Battista Chierchia; Mark La Meir; Carlo de Asmundis Journal: Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol Date: 2021-07-06