Charlotte Sleurs1,2, Jurgen Lemiere1, Trui Vercruysse1, Nathalie Nolf3, Ben Van Calster2, Sabine Deprez4,5, Marleen Renard1, Els Vandecruys3, Yves Benoit3, Anne Uyttebroeck1,2. 1. University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Leuven, Belgium. 2. KU Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium. 3. Ghent University Hospital, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Ghent, Belgium. 4. University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiology, Leuven, Belgium. 5. KU Leuven, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), radiotherapy for CNS prophylaxis is not used in frontline therapy anymore. Standard treatment for ALL nowadays consists of polychemotherapy. Therefore, assessment of potential chemotherapy-induced cognitive side effects becomes important. Although neurotoxicity was demonstrated in cross-sectional studies, longitudinal studies remain scarce. PROCEDURE: We evaluated intellectual development of 94 pediatric ALL patients between 1990 and 1997, diagnosed before the age of 12 years, treated according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Children's Leukemia Group 58881 protocol. Three assessments of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Revised were performed since diagnosis, according to age. Using repeated measures regression analysis, we investigated the effect of gender (low versus increased) risk group, parents' education, age at diagnosis, intelligence quotient (IQ) subscale (verbal (VIQ) versus performance (PIQ) intelligence), and test session. RESULTS: PIQ scores were lower than VIQ at baseline (-5.3 points on average, p = 0.0032), yet PIQ increased more strongly (PIQ: +3.9 points per test session; VIQ: +0.8, p = 0.0079), so this baseline difference disappeared (p = 0.0079). There were no clear effects of gender (girls: +0.6 points; p = 0.78) or risk group (low risk: +1.5 points; p = 0.49), but IQ scores were higher when one parent had followed higher education (+9.5 points, p < 0.0001). Finally, diagnosis at younger age predicted lower IQ scores (-1.3 points per year, p = 0.0009). CONCLUSION: Given that IQ scores did not decline, our findings demonstrate a stable pattern. However, the lower PIQ scores at baseline may indicate that performance functioning is vulnerable to acute neurotoxicity. Also, lower scores for younger patients highlight the stronger impact of the disease and/or treatment at younger age.
BACKGROUND: In childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), radiotherapy for CNS prophylaxis is not used in frontline therapy anymore. Standard treatment for ALL nowadays consists of polychemotherapy. Therefore, assessment of potential chemotherapy-induced cognitive side effects becomes important. Although neurotoxicity was demonstrated in cross-sectional studies, longitudinal studies remain scarce. PROCEDURE: We evaluated intellectual development of 94 pediatric ALL patients between 1990 and 1997, diagnosed before the age of 12 years, treated according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of CancerChildren's Leukemia Group 58881 protocol. Three assessments of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Revised were performed since diagnosis, according to age. Using repeated measures regression analysis, we investigated the effect of gender (low versus increased) risk group, parents' education, age at diagnosis, intelligence quotient (IQ) subscale (verbal (VIQ) versus performance (PIQ) intelligence), and test session. RESULTS: PIQ scores were lower than VIQ at baseline (-5.3 points on average, p = 0.0032), yet PIQ increased more strongly (PIQ: +3.9 points per test session; VIQ: +0.8, p = 0.0079), so this baseline difference disappeared (p = 0.0079). There were no clear effects of gender (girls: +0.6 points; p = 0.78) or risk group (low risk: +1.5 points; p = 0.49), but IQ scores were higher when one parent had followed higher education (+9.5 points, p < 0.0001). Finally, diagnosis at younger age predicted lower IQ scores (-1.3 points per year, p = 0.0009). CONCLUSION: Given that IQ scores did not decline, our findings demonstrate a stable pattern. However, the lower PIQ scores at baseline may indicate that performance functioning is vulnerable to acute neurotoxicity. Also, lower scores for younger patients highlight the stronger impact of the disease and/or treatment at younger age.
Authors: Qinying Yu; Xiaofang Zhong; Bingming Chen; Yu Feng; Min Ma; Carol A Diamond; Julie S Voeller; Miriam Kim; Kenneth B DeSantes; Christian M Capitini; Neha J Patel; Margo L Hoover-Regan; Michael J Burke; Kimberly Janko; Diane M Puccetti; Chrysanthy Ikonomidou; Lingjun Li Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Leanne K Mendoza; Jason M Ashford; Victoria W Willard; Kellie N Clark; Karen Martin-Elbahesh; Kristina K Hardy; Thomas E Merchant; Sima Jeha; Fang Wang; Hui Zhang; Heather M Conklin Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2019-09-27
Authors: Marita Partanen; Sean Phipps; Kathryn Russell; Doralina L Anghelescu; Joshua Wolf; Heather M Conklin; Kevin R Krull; Hiroto Inaba; Ching-Hon Pui; Lisa M Jacola Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2021-02-19
Authors: Ellen van der Plas; Weiyu Qiu; Brian J Nieman; Yutaka Yasui; Qi Liu; Stephanie B Dixon; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Christopher B Weldon; Brent R Weil; Lisa M Jacola; Todd M Gibson; Wendy Leisenring; Kevin Oeffinger; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin R Krull Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 13.506