Literature DB >> 27246229

In vitro Efficacy of Experimental Chitosan-Containing Solutions as Anti-Erosive Agents in Enamel.

N I P Pini1, D A N L Lima, J R Lovadino, C Ganss, N Schlueter.   

Abstract

The present study evaluated the effect of chitosans with different viscosities, dissolved in an AmF/SnCl2 solution, against erosion or erosion/abrasion. A total of 192 specimens were assigned to 2 × 6 groups (n = 16 specimens each): negative control, 4 chitosan solutions (groups Ch50, Ch500, Ch1000, and Ch2000, with viscosity of 50, 500, 1,000, or 2,000 mPas, respectively, 0.5% chitosan, 500 ppm F-, 800 ppm Sn2+, pH 4.4), and positive control (500 ppm F-, 800 ppm Sn2+, pH 4.3). One half of the groups was demineralized (experiment 1, E1; 10 days, 6 × 2 min/day, 0.5% citric acid, pH 2.8) and exposed to solutions (2 × 2 min/day); the other half was additionally brushed (15 s, 200 g) with non-fluoridated toothpaste before solution immersion (experiment 2, E2). Treatment effects were investigated by profilometry, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In E1, all the chitosan-containing solutions reduced enamel loss by 77-80%, to the same extent as the positive control, except for Ch2000 (p ≤ 0.05), which completely inhibited tissue loss by the formation of precipitates. In E2, Ch50 and Ch500 showed best performance, with approximately 60% reduction of tissue loss compared to the negative control group (p ≤ 0.05 compared to other groups). SEM analysis showed differences between negative control and the other groups but only minor differences amongst the groups treated with active agents. In both E1 and E2, treatment with active agents resulted in surface enrichment of carbon and tin compared to negative control (p ≤ 0.001); brushing removed parts of carbon and tin (p ≤ 0.001). Chitosan shows different properties under erosive and erosive/abrasive conditions. Under erosive conditions high viscosity might be helpful, whereas lower viscosity seems to be more effective in cases of chemo-mechanical challenges.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27246229     DOI: 10.1159/000445758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  5 in total

1.  Erosion protection benefits of stabilized SnF2 dentifrice versus an arginine-sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice: results from in vitro and in situ clinical studies.

Authors:  N X West; T He; E L Macdonald; J Seong; N Hellin; M L Barker; S L Eversole
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The protective effect of the experimental TiF4 and chitosan toothpaste on erosive tooth wear in vitro.

Authors:  Monique Malta Francese; Isabela Vieira Bolzan Gonçalves; Mariele Vertuan; Beatriz Martines de Souza; Ana Carolina Magalhães
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Film-Forming Polymers for Tooth Erosion Prevention.

Authors:  Marina Gullo Augusto; Tais Scaramucci; Tiago Moreira Bastos Campos; Idalina Vieira Aoki; Nadine Schlueter; Alessandra Bühler Borges
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 4.967

4.  Effects of different toothpastes on the prevention of erosion in composite resin and glass ionomer cement enamel and dentin restorations.

Authors:  Mariana Dias Moda; André Luiz Fraga Briso; Renata Parpinelli de Oliveira; Núbia Inocencya Pavesi Pini; Diego Felipe Mardegan GonÇalves; Paulo Henrique Dos Santos; Ticiane Cestari Fagundes
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Impact of mucin on the anti-erosive/anti-abrasive efficacy of chitosan and/or F/Sn in enamel in vitro.

Authors:  Benedikt Luka; Vivien Arbter; Kathrin Sander; Andrea Duerrschnabel; Nadine Schlueter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.