BACKGROUND: The pathology of multiple sclerosis (MS) consists of demyelination and neuronal injury, which occur early in the disease; yet, remission phases indicate repair. Whether and how the central nervous system (CNS) maintains homeostasis to counteract clinical impairment is not known. OBJECTIVE: We analyse the structural connectivity of white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM) networks to understand the absence of clinical decline as the disease progresses. METHODS: A total of 138 relapsing-remitting MS patients (classified into six groups by disease duration) and 32 healthy controls were investigated using 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Networks were analysed using graph theoretical approaches based on connectivity patterns derived from diffusion-tensor imaging with probabilistic tractography for WM and voxel-based morphometry and regional-volume-correlation matrix for GM. RESULTS: In the first year after disease onset, WM networks evolved to a structure of increased modularity, strengthened local connectivity and increased local clustering while no clinical decline occurred. GM networks showed a similar dynamic of increasing modularity. This modified connectivity pattern mainly involved the cerebellum, cingulum and temporo-parietal regions. Clinical impairment was associated at later disease stages with a divergence of the network patterns. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that network functionality in MS is maintained through structural adaptation towards increased local and modular connectivity, patterns linked to adaptability and homeostasis.
BACKGROUND: The pathology of multiple sclerosis (MS) consists of demyelination and neuronal injury, which occur early in the disease; yet, remission phases indicate repair. Whether and how the central nervous system (CNS) maintains homeostasis to counteract clinical impairment is not known. OBJECTIVE: We analyse the structural connectivity of white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM) networks to understand the absence of clinical decline as the disease progresses. METHODS: A total of 138 relapsing-remitting MS patients (classified into six groups by disease duration) and 32 healthy controls were investigated using 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Networks were analysed using graph theoretical approaches based on connectivity patterns derived from diffusion-tensor imaging with probabilistic tractography for WM and voxel-based morphometry and regional-volume-correlation matrix for GM. RESULTS: In the first year after disease onset, WM networks evolved to a structure of increased modularity, strengthened local connectivity and increased local clustering while no clinical decline occurred. GM networks showed a similar dynamic of increasing modularity. This modified connectivity pattern mainly involved the cerebellum, cingulum and temporo-parietal regions. Clinical impairment was associated at later disease stages with a divergence of the network patterns. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that network functionality in MS is maintained through structural adaptation towards increased local and modular connectivity, patterns linked to adaptability and homeostasis.
Authors: Kevin R Patel; Sean Tobyne; Daria Porter; John Daniel Bireley; Victoria Smith; Eric Klawiter Journal: Brain Struct Funct Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 3.270
Authors: Gabriel Mangeat; Atef Badji; Russell Ouellette; Constantina A Treaba; Elena Herranz; Tobias Granberg; Céline Louapre; Nikola Stikov; Jacob A Sloane; Pierre Bellec; Caterina Mainero; Julien Cohen-Adad Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Declan T Chard; Adnan A S Alahmadi; Bertrand Audoin; Thalis Charalambous; Christian Enzinger; Hanneke E Hulst; Maria A Rocca; Àlex Rovira; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Menno M Schoonheim; Betty Tijms; Carmen Tur; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Alle Meije Wink; Olga Ciccarelli; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Sara Llufriu; Eloy Martinez-Heras; Elisabeth Solana; Nuria Sola-Valls; Maria Sepulveda; Yolanda Blanco; Elena H Martinez-Lapiscina; Magi Andorra; Pablo Villoslada; Alberto Prats-Galino; Albert Saiz Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla; Muthuraman Muthuraman; Venkata C Chirumamilla; Johannes Vogt; Sergiu Groppa Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Marlene Tahedl; Seth M Levine; Mark W Greenlee; Robert Weissert; Jens V Schwarzbach Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 4.003