Literature DB >> 27246097

Promises and Challenges of Eco-Physiological Genomics in the Field: Tests of Drought Responses in Switchgrass.

John T Lovell1, Eugene V Shakirov1, Scott Schwartz1, David B Lowry1, Michael J Aspinwall1, Samuel H Taylor1, Jason Bonnette1, Juan Diego Palacio-Mejia1, Christine V Hawkes1, Philip A Fay1, Thomas E Juenger2.   

Abstract

Identifying the physiological and genetic basis of stress tolerance in plants has proven to be critical to understanding adaptation in both agricultural and natural systems. However, many discoveries were initially made in the controlled conditions of greenhouses or laboratories, not in the field. To test the comparability of drought responses across field and greenhouse environments, we undertook three independent experiments using the switchgrass reference genotype Alamo AP13. We analyzed physiological and gene expression variation across four locations, two sampling times, and three years. Relatively similar physiological responses and expression coefficients of variation across experiments masked highly dissimilar gene expression responses to drought. Critically, a drought experiment utilizing small pots in the greenhouse elicited nearly identical physiological changes as an experiment conducted in the field, but an order of magnitude more differentially expressed genes. However, we were able to define a suite of several hundred genes that were differentially expressed across all experiments. This list was strongly enriched in photosynthesis, water status, and reactive oxygen species responsive genes. The strong across-experiment correlations between physiological plasticity-but not differential gene expression-highlight the complex and diverse genetic mechanisms that can produce phenotypically similar responses to various soil water deficits.
© 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27246097      PMCID: PMC5047078          DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  60 in total

Review 1.  Stay wet or else: three ways in which plants can adjust hydraulically to their environment.

Authors:  Pablo H Maseda; Roberto J Fernández
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.992

2.  Plant productivity and environment.

Authors:  J S Boyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Characterizing differences in precipitation regimes of extreme wet and dry years: implications for climate change experiments.

Authors:  Alan K Knapp; David L Hoover; Kevin R Wilcox; Meghan L Avolio; Sally E Koerner; Kimberly J La Pierre; Michael E Loik; Yiqi Luo; Osvaldo E Sala; Melinda D Smith
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Plant-soil feedbacks: a comparative study on the relative importance of soil feedbacks in the greenhouse versus the field.

Authors:  Johannes Heinze; M Sitte; A Schindhelm; J Wright; J Joshi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The ABI1 and ABI2 protein phosphatases 2C act in a negative feedback regulatory loop of the abscisic acid signalling pathway.

Authors:  S Merlot; F Gosti; D Guerrier; A Vavasseur; J Giraudat
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.417

6.  Stomatal response to abscisic Acid is a function of current plant water status.

Authors:  F Tardieu; W J Davies
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Molecular and physiological analysis of drought stress in Arabidopsis reveals early responses leading to acclimation in plant growth.

Authors:  Amal Harb; Arjun Krishnan; Madana M R Ambavaram; Andy Pereira
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Capturing candidate drought tolerance traits in two native Andean potato clones by transcription profiling of field grown plants under water stress.

Authors:  Roland Schafleitner; Raymundo Oscar Gutierrez Rosales; Amelie Gaudin; Carlos Alberto Alvarado Aliaga; Giannina Nomberto Martinez; Luz Rosalina Tincopa Marca; Luis Avila Bolivar; Felipe Mendiburu Delgado; Reinhard Simon; Merideth Bonierbale
Journal:  Plant Physiol Biochem       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.270

9.  A biomarker based on gene expression indicates plant water status in controlled and natural environments.

Authors:  Gwenaëlle Marchand; Baptiste Mayjonade; Didier Varès; Nicolas Blanchet; Marie-Claude Boniface; Pierre Maury; Fety Nambinina Andrianasolo; Fety Andrianasolo Nambinina; Philippe Burger; Philippe Debaeke; Pierre Casadebaig; Patrick Vincourt; Nicolas B Langlade
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 7.228

10.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  13 in total

1.  Focus on Ecophysiology.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Carl J Bernacchi; Frank G Dohleman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  A High-Throughput 3'-Tag RNA Sequencing for Large-Scale Time-Series Transcriptome Studies.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Weng; Thomas E Juenger
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Genome-wide association studies identify putative pleiotropic locus mediating drought tolerance in sorghum.

Authors:  Fanna Maina; Abdou Harou; Falalou Hamidou; Geoffrey P Morris
Journal:  Plant Direct       Date:  2022-06-16

4.  TagSeq for gene expression in non-model plants: A pilot study at the Santa Rita Experimental Range NEON core site.

Authors:  Hannah E Marx; Stephen Scheidt; Michael S Barker; Katrina M Dlugosch
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 1.936

5.  Reproductive stage physiological and transcriptional responses to salinity stress in reciprocal populations derived from tolerant (Horkuch) and susceptible (IR29) rice.

Authors:  Samsad Razzaque; Taslima Haque; Sabrina M Elias; Md Sazzadur Rahman; Sudip Biswas; Scott Schwartz; Abdelbagi M Ismail; Harkamal Walia; Thomas E Juenger; Zeba I Seraj
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Transcriptome Analysis Identifies a 140 kb Region of Chromosome 3B Containing Genes Specific to Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat.

Authors:  Xin Li; Shengfu Zhong; Wanquan Chen; Syeda Akash Fatima; Qianglan Huang; Qing Li; Feiquan Tan; Peigao Luo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  The genomic landscape of molecular responses to natural drought stress in Panicum hallii.

Authors:  John T Lovell; Jerry Jenkins; David B Lowry; Sujan Mamidi; Avinash Sreedasyam; Xiaoyu Weng; Kerrie Barry; Jason Bonnette; Brandon Campitelli; Chris Daum; Sean P Gordon; Billie A Gould; Albina Khasanova; Anna Lipzen; Alice MacQueen; Juan Diego Palacio-Mejía; Christopher Plott; Eugene V Shakirov; Shengqiang Shu; Yuko Yoshinaga; Matt Zane; Dave Kudrna; Jason D Talag; Daniel Rokhsar; Jane Grimwood; Jeremy Schmutz; Thomas E Juenger
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Metabolite and transcript profiling of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq) response to elevated [CO2] and temperature.

Authors:  Jessica M Wedow; Craig R Yendrek; Tathyana R Mello; Silvana Creste; Carlos A Martinez; Elizabeth A Ainsworth
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 9.  Linking genes with ecological strategies in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Margarita Takou; Benedict Wieters; Stanislav Kopriva; George Coupland; Anja Linstädter; Juliette De Meaux
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  FIT: statistical modeling tool for transcriptome dynamics under fluctuating field conditions.

Authors:  Koji Iwayama; Yuri Aisaka; Natsumaro Kutsuna; Atsushi J Nagano
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.