| Literature DB >> 27246013 |
Kentaro Kaneko1, Maiko Sasaki1, Nanako Kuribayashi1, Hiromu Suzuki1, Yukiko Sasuga2, Takeshi Shiraya2,3, Takuya Inomata1, Kimiko Itoh1, Marouane Baslam1, Toshiaki Mitsui4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Global climate models predict an increase in global mean temperature and a higher frequency of intense heat spikes during this century. Cereals such asEntities:
Keywords: Amylase; Chaperones; Endosperm; Environment; Grain chalkiness; Heat shock protein; High-temperature stress; Late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) protein; Starch granule; Stress-related protein
Year: 2016 PMID: 27246013 PMCID: PMC4887401 DOI: 10.1186/s12284-016-0100-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 4.783
Fig. 1Morphological characteristics of chalky grain of rice. (A) Perfect grain. Left and right panels show pictures of whole grain and horizontal slice, respectively. (B) Chalky grain. Left, whole grain; middle, vertical slice; right, horizontal slices. (C) SEM pictures. Center part of perfect grain (a), and translucent (b) and opaque (c) parts of chalky grain were subjected to SEM observation. Magnifications were x1,000 (a,b,c-1), x4,000 (c-2) and x10,000 (c-3, c-4), respectively
Fig. 2Proteome of perfect and chalky grains of rice. Center part of perfect grains and opaque part of chalky grains harvested in 2009 and 2010 were subjected to protein extraction, followed by in solution shotgun proteomic analysis with iTRAQ labeling. (A/B): a, Total identified proteins (935); b ≧ Two-fold up- or down-regulated proteins in the chalky grains of 2010 (61)
Fig. 3Proteome of stress-related proteins in chalky grains. Center part of perfect grains and opaque part of chalky grains harvested in 2009 and 2010 were subjected to protein extraction, followed by in solution shotgun proteomic analysis with iTRAQ labeling. a Late embryogenesis abundant proteins; b Heat shock proteins; c Glutathione redox regulation; d other stress-related proteins. Proteins were categorized by NCBI databases. Values are represented as mean ± s.d. (n = 3)
Fig. 4Proteome of starch metabolism in chalky grains. Center part of perfect grains and opaque part of chalky grains harvested in 2009 and 2010 were subjected to protein extraction, followed by in solution shotgun proteomic analysis with iTRAQ labeling. a starch synthesis and degradation; b ADP-glucose supply. Values are represented as mean ± s.d. (n = 3)
Fig. 5Chain-length distributions of perfect and chalky grain amylopectins of rice. Rice grains were harvested in 2009 and 2010 that the average temperatures of grain filling periods were 24.4 and 28.0 °C, respectively. Center part of perfect grains and translucent and opaque parts of chalky grains were subjected to starch extraction, followed by APTS labeling and capillary electrophoretic analysis. Bottom panels show differences in the chain distributions of amylopectins in perfect and chalky grains. Blue lines, differences between the opaque part of chalky grain and perfect grain; red lines, differences between the translucent part of chalky grain and perfect grain. Values are represented as mean ± s.d. (n = 3)
Fig. 6Soluble starch with glucose (a) and sucrose (b) contents in the perfect and chalky (opaque part) grains harvested in 2009 and 2010. Values are represented as mean ± s.d. (n = 6–12). Histograms with the same letter do not differ significantly (p ≤0.05)
Fig. 7Changes in the expression of α-amylase isoforms in central opaque area of chalky grains harvested in 2009 and 2010. a Immunoblotting images. Center part of perfect grain and opaque part of chalky grain were subjected to protein, followed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with specific antibodies. C, germinating seeds after 5 days of imbibition; lane 1, perfect grain in 2009; lane 2, chalky grain in 2009; lane 3, perfect grain in 2010; lane 4, chalky grain in 2010. b Quantitation of α-amylase isoforms expression. Amount of each α-amylase isoform in perfect grains was normalized to 1 unit. The perfect proteins of AmyII-5 and AmyII-6 were not detected. Values are represented as mean ± s.d. (n = 3). Histograms with the same letter do not differ significantly (p ≤0.05)