| Literature DB >> 27245580 |
Sabin Filimon1, Keith Richardson2, Michael P Hier3, Michael Roskies2, Alex M Mlynarek4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lip reconstruction for defects greater than 80 % present a challenge in maintaining acceptable oral function and good aesthetic results. Abbé flaps offer an excellent reconstructive option but are limited to defects under 65 %.Entities:
Keywords: Abbé flap; Lip reconstruction; Modified Karapandzic; Over 80 % lip defects
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27245580 PMCID: PMC4886402 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-016-0148-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN: 1916-0208
Fig. 1Radial forearm flap and palmaris longus tendon sling for reconstruction of a large squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip. The palmaris longus is tunneled to an opening near the zygoma
Summary of clinical findings
| Clinical finding | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | Case 6 | Ratio and mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 67 | 84 | 56 | 72 | 67 | 53 | 66.5 |
| Sex | M | F | M | F | M | M | 2:1 |
| Smoking History | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6/6 |
| Tumora | BCC | MCC | KA | SCC | SCC | SCC | - |
| Upper/lower lip | Upper | Upper | Lower | Lower | Lower | Lower | 2/4 |
| Stage | T3N0M0 | T3N0M0 | N/A | T3N0M0 | T2N0M0 | T2N0M0 | - |
| Defect of the lip | 85 % | 90 % | 90 % | 85 % | 85 % | 85 % | 86.6 % |
a BCC Basal Cell Carcinoma, MCC Merkel Cell Carcinoma, KA Keratoacanthoma, SCC Squamous Cell Carcinoma
The form used in measurement of functional and aesthetic results
| Scores | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional assessment | ||||||
| Sensibility | ||||||
| - Hypoesthesia | 1 | |||||
| - Normal | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100 % |
| Competence | ||||||
| - Incompetence | 1 | |||||
| - Sialorrhea at rest | 2 | |||||
| - Sialorrhea with fluid | 3 | 3 | 3 | 50 % | ||
| - Complete competence | 4 | 4 | 4 | 50 % | ||
| Speech | ||||||
| - Not intelligible | 1 | |||||
| - Partial intelligible | 2 | |||||
| - Fully intelligible | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 100 % |
| Preservation of facial expression | ||||||
| - Asymmetric | 1 | |||||
| - Symmetric | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100 % |
| Dietary and cutlery usage | ||||||
| - Diet and cutlery modified | 1 | |||||
| - Eats as before surgery | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100 % |
| Aesthetic Assessment | ||||||
| Stoma | ||||||
| - Severe microstomia | 1 | |||||
| - Moderate Microstomia | 2 | |||||
| - Mild Microstomia | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 100 % |
| Symmetry of commissures | ||||||
| - Not symmetrical | 1 | |||||
| - Symmetrical at rest | 2 | 2 | 2 | 50 % | ||
| - Symmetrical at rest and mouth opening | 3 | 3 | 3 | 50 % | ||
| Amount of Scaring | ||||||
| - Visible from distance | 1 | |||||
| - Visible at proximity | 2 | 2 | 25 % | |||
| - Visible face to face | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 75 % | |
| Preservation of the philtrum | ||||||
| - Philtrum absent | 1 | 1 | 25 % | |||
| - Philtrum present | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 75 % | |
| Overall satisfaction | ||||||
| - Not satisfied | 1 | |||||
| - Somewhat satisfied | 2 | |||||
| - Satisfied | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 75 % | |
| - Very satisfied | 4 | 4 | 25 % | |||
Fig. 2Case 1. a Large Basal cell carcinoma involving the upper lip. b Resection of BCC with 1 cm margin. c Abbé plus bilateral Karapandzic flaps sutured in place. (d) (e) (f) One-year post-operative results with good mouth opening and oral competence
Fig. 3Case 2. a Large Merkel cell carcinoma involving most of the upper lip. b Resection of the tumor with 1 cm margin. c Abbé flap sutured in place with primary closure of the donor site. d One-year and a half postoperative results with good cosmetic and functional outcomes
Fig. 4Case 3. a Large Keratoacanthoma involving the lower lip. b Resection of the tumor with 1 cm margin. c Abbé flap sutured in place with primary closure of the donor site. d Division of the pedicle flap at six weeks. (e) (f) One-year postoperative results with good cosmetic results and normal mouth opening
Fig. 5Case 5. (a) (b) (c) One-year postoperative pictures with good lip function and aesthetic results
Fig. 6Case 6. (a) (b) (c) One-year postoperative pictures with good lip function and aesthetic results