Literature DB >> 27244852

Timing of Return to Work and Breastfeeding in Australia.

Ning Xiang1, Maria Zadoroznyj2, Wojtek Tomaszewski2, Bill Martin2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of timing of return to work, number of hours worked, and their interaction, on the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6 months and predominant breastfeeding at 16 weeks.
METHODS: A nationally representative sample of Australian mothers in paid employment in the 13 months before giving birth (n = 2300) were surveyed by telephone. Four multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the effects of timing of return to work and work hours, independently and in interaction, on any breastfeeding at 6 months and on predominant breastfeeding at 16 weeks, controlling for maternal sociodemographics, employment patterns, and health measures.
RESULTS: Mothers who returned to work within 6 months and who worked for ≥20 hours per week were significantly less likely than mothers who had not returned to work to be breastfeeding at 6 months. However, returning to work for ≤19 hours per week had no significant impact on the likelihood of breastfeeding regardless of when mothers returned to work. Older maternal age, higher educational attainment, better physical or mental health, managerial or professional maternal occupation, and being self-employed all significantly contributed to the increased likelihood of any breastfeeding at 6 months. Similar patterns exist for predominant breastfeeding at 16 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: The effects of timing of return to work are secondary to the hours of employment. Working ≤19 hours per week is associated with higher likelihood of maintaining breastfeeding, regardless of timing of return to work.
Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27244852     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-3883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  7 in total

1.  Maternity or parental leave and breastfeeding duration: Results from the ELFE cohort.

Authors:  Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain; Xavier Thierry; Corinne Bois; Marie Bournez; Camille Davisse-Paturet; Marie-Noëlle Dufourg; Claire Kersuzan; Eléa Ksiazek; Sophie Nicklaus; Hélène Vicaire; Sandra Wagner; Sandrine Lioret; Marie Aline Charles
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The association between intrapartum interventions and immediate and ongoing breastfeeding outcomes: an Australian retrospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Madison S Andrew; Roshan J Selvaratnam; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kim Howland; Mary-Ann Davey
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.790

3.  Association Between Maternal Work and Exclusive Breastfeeding in Countries of Latin America and Caribbean.

Authors:  Marília Neves Santos; Catarina Machado Azeredo; Ana Elisa Madalena Rinaldi
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-03-04

4.  Effectiveness of a breastfeeding program for mothers returning to work in Japan: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Kaori Nakada
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.461

Review 5.  Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding practice and its association with maternal employment in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Getu Engida Wake; Yohannes Moges Mittiku
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 3.461

6.  Breastfeeding practices, beliefs, and social norms in low-resource communities in Mexico: Insights for how to improve future promotion strategies.

Authors:  Tessa M Swigart; Anabelle Bonvecchio; Florence L Théodore; Sophia Zamudio-Haas; Maria Angeles Villanueva-Borbolla; James F Thrasher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Combining breastfeeding and work: findings from the Epifane population-based birth cohort.

Authors:  Katia Castetbon; Julie Boudet-Berquier; Benoit Salanave
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.