Ali Shafiq1,2,3, Natalie Jayaram1, Kensey L Gosch1, John A Spertus1,2,3, Donna M Buchanan1,2,3, Carole Decker1,2, Mikhail Kosiborod1,2,3, Suzanne V Arnold1,2,3. 1. Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri. 2. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri. 3. Department of Cardiology, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) are commonly used in patients with cardiovascular disease. Although there is lack of evidence regarding the benefit of CAM on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, health-status benefits could justify CAM use. HYPOTHESIS: Adoption of mind-body CAM after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with improved health status, though other forms of CAM are not associated with health-status improvement. METHODS: Patients with AMI from 24 US sites were assessed for CAM use (categorized as mind-body, biological, and manipulative therapies) prior to and 1 year after AMI. Among patients who reported not using CAM prior to their AMI, association of initiating CAM on patients' health status at 1 year after AMI was assessed using Angina Frequency and Quality of Life domains from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the Short Form-12 Physical and Mental Component scales. Multivariable regression helped examine association between use of different CAM therapies and health status. RESULTS: Among 1884 patients not using CAM at the time of their AMI, 33% reported initiating ≥1 forms of CAM therapy 1 year following AMI: 62% adopted mind-body therapies, 42% adopted biological therapies, and 15% began using manipulative therapies. In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, we found no association between different types of CAM use and health-status improvement after AMI. CONCLUSIONS: There was no association between CAM use and health-status recovery after AMI. Until randomized trials suggest otherwise, these findings underscore the importance of focusing on therapies with proven effectiveness after AMI.
BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) are commonly used in patients with cardiovascular disease. Although there is lack of evidence regarding the benefit of CAM on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, health-status benefits could justify CAM use. HYPOTHESIS: Adoption of mind-body CAM after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with improved health status, though other forms of CAM are not associated with health-status improvement. METHODS:Patients with AMI from 24 US sites were assessed for CAM use (categorized as mind-body, biological, and manipulative therapies) prior to and 1 year after AMI. Among patients who reported not using CAM prior to their AMI, association of initiating CAM on patients' health status at 1 year after AMI was assessed using Angina Frequency and Quality of Life domains from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the Short Form-12 Physical and Mental Component scales. Multivariable regression helped examine association between use of different CAM therapies and health status. RESULTS: Among 1884 patients not using CAM at the time of their AMI, 33% reported initiating ≥1 forms of CAM therapy 1 year following AMI: 62% adopted mind-body therapies, 42% adopted biological therapies, and 15% began using manipulative therapies. In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, we found no association between different types of CAM use and health-status improvement after AMI. CONCLUSIONS: There was no association between CAM use and health-status recovery after AMI. Until randomized trials suggest otherwise, these findings underscore the importance of focusing on therapies with proven effectiveness after AMI.
Authors: Robert H Schneider; Clarence E Grim; Maxwell V Rainforth; Theodore Kotchen; Sanford I Nidich; Carolyn Gaylord-King; John W Salerno; Jane Morley Kotchen; Charles N Alexander Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2012-11-13
Authors: Suzanne V Arnold; Paul S Chan; Philip G Jones; Carole Decker; Donna M Buchanan; Harlan M Krumholz; P Michael Ho; John A Spertus Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2011-07
Authors: Catherine Buettner; Russell S Phillips; Roger B Davis; Paula Gardiner; Murray A Mittleman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-01-04 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Sidsel Bekke-Hansen; Christina Gundgaard Pedersen; Kristian Thygesen; Søren Christensen; Lynn C Waelde; Robert Zachariae Journal: Complement Ther Med Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 2.446