Literature DB >> 27244576

Smaller introducer sheaths for REBOA may be associated with fewer complications.

William A Teeter1, Junichi Matsumoto, Koji Idoguchi, Yuri Kon, Tomohiko Orita, Tomohiro Funabiki, Megan L Brenner, Yosuke Matsumura.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Large arterial sheaths currently used for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) may be associated with severe complications. Smaller diameter catheters compatible with 7Fr sheaths may improve the safety profile.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients receiving REBOA through a 7Fr sheath for refractory traumatic hemorrhagic shock was performed from January 2014 to June 2015 at five tertiary-care hospitals in Japan. Demographics were collected including method of arterial access; outcomes included mortality and REBOA-related access complications.
RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent REBOA at Zone 1 (level of the diaphragm). Most patients were male (70%), with a mean age (+SD) 50 ± 18 years, mean BMI 23 ± 4, and a median [IQR] ISS of 38 [34, 52]. Ninety-four percent of patients presented after sustaining injuries from blunt mechanisms. Twenty-four percent underwent CPR before arrival, and an additional 15% received CPR after admission. Percutaneous arterial access without ultrasound or fluoroscopy was achieved in all patients. Systolic blood pressure increased significantly following balloon occlusion (mean 62 ± 36 to 106 ± 40 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Median total duration of complete initial occlusion was 26 [range 10-35] minutes. Sixteen patients (49%) survived beyond 24 hours, and 14 patients (42%) survived beyond 30 days. Twenty-four-hour and 30-day survival were 48% and 42%, respectively. Of the patients surviving 24 hours (n = 16), median duration of sheath placement was 28 [range 18-45] hours with all removed using manual pressure to achieve hemostasis. Of 33 REBOAs, 20 were performed by Emergency Medicine practitioners, 10 by Emergency Medicine practitioners with endovascular training, and 3 by Interventional Radiologists. No complication related to sheath insertion or removal was identified during the follow-up period, including dissection, pseudoaneurysm, retroperitoneal hematoma, leg ischemia, or distal embolism.
CONCLUSIONS: 7Fr REBOA catheters can significantly elevate systolic blood pressure with no access-related complications. Our results suggest that a 7Fr introducer device for REBOA may be a safe and effective alternative to large-bore sheaths, and may remain in place during the post-procedure resuscitative phase without sequelae. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27244576     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  30 in total

1.  Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: what is the optimum occlusion time in an ovine model of hemorrhagic shock?

Authors:  V A Reva; Y Matsumura; T Hörer; D A Sveklov; A V Denisov; S Y Telickiy; A B Seleznev; E R Bozhedomova; J Matsumoto; I M Samokhvalov; J J Morrison
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  The utilization of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: preparation, technique, and the implementation of a novel approach to stabilizing hemorrhage.

Authors:  Dong Hun Kim; Sung Wook Chang; Junichi Matsumoto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Non-traumatic hemorrhage is controlled with REBOA in acute phase then mortality increases gradually by non-hemorrhagic causes: DIRECT-IABO registry in Japan.

Authors:  Y Matsumura; J Matsumoto; K Idoguchi; H Kondo; T Ishida; Y Kon; K Tomita; K Ishida; T Hirose; K Umakoshi; T Funabiki
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  [Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta : Option for incompressible trunk bleeding?]

Authors:  J Knapp; M Bernhard; T Haltmeier; D Bieler; B Hossfeld; M Kulla
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  A contemporary assessment of devices for Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): resource-specific options per level of care.

Authors:  Suzanne M Vrancken; Boudewijn L S Borger van der Burg; Paul J E M Vrancken; Gert-Aldert H Kock; Todd E Rasmussen; Rigo Hoencamp
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 6.  Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Scoping Review of Utilization of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta.

Authors:  Makoto Aoki; Toshikazu Abe
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-16

7.  Hate to Burst Your Balloon: Successful REBOA Use Takes More Than a Course.

Authors:  Christina M Theodorou; Edgardo S Salcedo; Joseph J DuBose; Joseph M Galante
Journal:  J Endovasc Resusc Trauma Manag       Date:  2020

8.  Strategies for successful implementation of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in an urban Level I trauma center.

Authors:  Jamie B Hadley; Julia R Coleman; Ernest E Moore; Ryan Lawless; Clay C Burlew; Barry Platnick; Fredric M Pieracci; Melanie R Hoehn; Jamie J Coleman; Eric M Campion; Mitchell J Cohen; Alexis Cralley; Andrew P Eitel; Matthew Bartley; Navin Vigneshwar; Angela Sauaia; Charles J Fox
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.697

9.  Lower limb ischemia caused by resuscitative balloon occlusion of aorta.

Authors:  Yohei Okada; Hiromichi Narumiya; Wataru Ishi; Iiduka Ryoji
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-11-10

10.  Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta-Interest is widespread but need for training persists.

Authors:  Jason M Samuels; Kaiwen Sun; Ernest E Moore; Julia R Coleman; Charles J Fox; Mitchell J Cohen; Angela Sauaia; Jason N MacTaggart
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.697

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.