Literature DB >> 27244114

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire to the Arabic Language.

Samia Alamrani1, Hana Alsobayel, Ali H Alnahdi, Niamh Moloney, Martin Mackey.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric testing.
OBJECTIVE: To translate the Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) into Arabic and investigate its psychometric properties in an Arabic-speaking sample of individuals with low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Back pain beliefs are associated with pain chronicity and disability in people with LBP. The BBQ is a recognized and frequently used tool for measuring these beliefs. To date the BBQ has not been translated into Arabic.
METHODS: The English version of the BBQ was translated and culturally adapted into Arabic (BBQ-Ar) according to published guidelines. The BBQ-Ar was then tested in a sample of 115 Arabic-speaking individuals with LBP. Reliability was evaluated through internal consistency (Cronbach α) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), the latter in a subgroup of 25. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis and by examining the correlation between the BBQ-Ar, the Oswestry Disability Index and a Numerical Pain Rating Scale.
RESULTS: Internal consistency of the BBQ-Ar was good (Cronbach α = 0.77). Test-retest reliability was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [2,1] = 0.88). Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure, explaining 46% of total variance, with the first factor alone explaining 24%. Eight of the nine scoring items were loaded on the first factor thus forming a unidimensional scale. A significant negative correlation was found between Oswestry Disability Index and BBQ-Ar scores (r = -0.307; P < 0.01), whereas no significant correlation was found between BBQ-Ar and Pain Rating Scale scores. No floor or celling effects were observed.
CONCLUSION: The BBQ-Ar is a valid and reliable tool that can be used to assess back pain beliefs in Arabic-speaking individuals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27244114     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  Psychometric validation of the cross-culturally adapted traditional Chinese version of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ).

Authors:  Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Carlos King Ho Wong; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The Hausa Back Beliefs Questionnaire: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment in mixed urban and rural Nigerian populations with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Aminu Alhassan Ibrahim; Mukadas Oyeniran Akindele; Sokunbi Oluwaleke Ganiyu; Bashir Kaka; Bashir Bello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Primary Investigation of Low Back Pain among Saudi Arabians: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Asma Saad Alrushud; Dalyah Mohammed Alamam; Muneera Mohammed Almurdi; Shouq Khalid Almutairi; Razan Othman Alzahrani; Manal Salem Alanazi; Wafa Madani Dhahi; Dimah Majid Alshaiqy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Back beliefs among elderly seeking health care due to back pain; psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the back beliefs questionnaire.

Authors:  Alexander Tingulstad; Rikke Munk; Margreth Grotle; Ørjan Vigdal; Kjersti Storheim; Birgitta Langhammer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.