Literature DB >> 27244044

Comparison of Low-Value Care in Medicaid vs Commercially Insured Populations.

Christina J Charlesworth1, Thomas H A Meath1, Aaron L Schwartz2, K John McConnell3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Reducing unnecessary tests and treatments is a potentially promising approach for improving the value of health care. However, relatively little is known about whether insurance type or local practice patterns are associated with delivery of low-value care.
OBJECTIVES: To compare low-value care in the Medicaid and commercially insured populations, test whether provision of low-value care is associated with insurance type, and assess whether local practice patterns are associated with the provision of low-value care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study of claims data from the Oregon Division of Medical Assistance Programs and the Oregon All-Payer All-Claims database included Medicaid and commercially insured adults aged 18 to 64 years. The study period was January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Low-value care was assessed using 16 claims-based measures. Logistic regression was used to test the association between Medicaid vs commercial insurance coverage and low-value care and the association between Medicaid and commercial low-value care rates within primary care service areas (PCSAs).
RESULTS: This study included 286 769 Medicaid and 1 376 308 commercial enrollees in 2013. Medicaid enrollees were younger (167 847 [58.5%] of Medicaid enrollees were aged 18-34 years vs 505 628 [36.7%] of those with commercial insurance) but generally had worse health status compared with those with commercial insurance. Medicaid enrollees were also more likely to be female (180 363 [62.9%] vs 702 165 [51.0%]) and live in a rural area (120 232 [41.9%] vs 389 964 [28.3%]). A total of 10 304 of 69 338 qualifying Medicaid patients (14.9%; 95% CI, 14.6%-15.1%) received at least 1 low-value service during 2013; the corresponding rate for commercially insured patients was 35 739 of 314 023 (11.4%; 95% CI, 11.3%-11.5%). No consistent association was found between insurance type and low-value care. Compared with commercial patients, Medicaid patients were more likely to receive low-value care for 10 measures and less likely to receive low-value care for 5 others. For 7 of 11 low-value care measures, Medicaid patients were significantly more likely to receive low-value care if they resided in a PCSA with a higher rate of low-value care for commercial patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Oregon Medicaid and commercially insured patients received moderate amounts of low-value care in 2013. No consistent association was found between insurance type and low-value care. However, Medicaid and commercial rates of low-value care were associated with one another within PCSAs. Low-value care may be more closely related to local practice patterns than to reimbursement generosity or insurance benefit structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27244044      PMCID: PMC4942278          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  20 in total

1.  Managed care and medical expenditures of Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Michael Chernew; Philip Decicca; Robert Town
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Choosing wisely--the politics and economics of labeling low-value services.

Authors:  Nancy E Morden; Carrie H Colla; Thomas D Sequist; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Medicare Managed Care Spillovers and Treatment Intensity.

Authors:  Kevin Callison
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Geographic correlation between large-firm commercial spending and Medicare spending.

Authors:  Michael E Chernew; Lindsay M Sabik; Amitabh Chandra; Teresa B Gibson; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Variation in the tendency of primary care physicians to intervene.

Authors:  Brenda E Sirovich; Daniel J Gottlieb; H Gilbert Welch; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-10-24

6.  Oregon's Medicaid Transformation: An Innovative Approach To Holding A Health System Accountable For Spending Growth.

Authors:  K John McConnell; Anna Marie Chang; Deborah J Cohen; Neal Wallace; Michael E Chernew; Glenn Kautz; Dennis McCarty; Bentson McFarland; Bill Wright; Jeanene Smith
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2014-09

7.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Measuring low-value care in Medicare.

Authors:  Aaron L Schwartz; Bruce E Landon; Adam G Elshaug; Michael E Chernew; J Michael McWilliams
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Trends in the overuse of ambulatory health care services in the United States.

Authors:  Minal S Kale; Tara F Bishop; Alex D Federman; Salomeh Keyhani
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  MEDICARE PAYMENTS AND SYSTEM-LEVEL HEALTH-CARE USE: The Spillover Effects of Medicare Managed Care.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; Jacob A Robbins
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2015-10-16
View more
  29 in total

1.  Oregon's Medicaid Reform And Transition To Global Budgets Were Associated With Reductions In Expenditures.

Authors:  K John McConnell; Stephanie Renfro; Richard C Lindrooth; Deborah J Cohen; Neal T Wallace; Michael E Chernew
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Payer Type and Low-Value Care: Comparing Choosing Wisely Services across Commercial and Medicare Populations.

Authors:  Carrie H Colla; Nancy E Morden; Thomas D Sequist; Alexander J Mainor; Zhonghe Li; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Defining and measuring imaging appropriateness in low back pain studies: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mark Yates; Crystian B Oliveira; James B Galloway; Chris G Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Differences in the Receipt of Low-Value Services Between Publicly and Privately Insured Children.

Authors:  Kao-Ping Chua; Aaron L Schwartz; Anna Volerman; Rena M Conti; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Oregon's Emphasis On Equity Shows Signs Of Early Success For Black And American Indian Medicaid Enrollees.

Authors:  K John McConnell; Christina J Charlesworth; Thomas H A Meath; Rani M George; Hyunjee Kim
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Low-Value Medical Services in the Safety-Net Population.

Authors:  Michael L Barnett; Jeffrey A Linder; Cheryl R Clark; Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Overuse and insurance plan type in a privately insured population.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Carrie H Colla; Nancy E Morden; Thomas D Sequist; Alexander J Mainor; Zhonghe Li; Kevin H Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Use of Low-Value Pediatric Services Among the Commercially Insured.

Authors:  Kao-Ping Chua; Aaron L Schwartz; Anna Volerman; Rena M Conti; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Preoperative pulmonary function tests before low-risk surgery in Japan: a retrospective cohort study using a claims database.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yonekura; Kazuki Ide; Kahori Seto; Yohei Kawasaki; Shiro Tanaka; Isao Nahara; Chikashi Takeda; Koji Kawakami
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Effects of employer-offered high-deductible plans on low-value spending in the privately insured population.

Authors:  Brendan Rabideau; Matthew D Eisenberg; Rachel Reid; Neeraj Sood
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.