Literature DB >> 27243804

Ilizarov bone transport versus fibular graft for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in children.

Mostafa Abdelkhalek1, Barakat El-Alfy, Ayman M Ali.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the results of treatment of segmental tibial defects in the pediatric age group using an Ilizarov external fixator versus a nonvascularized fibular bone graft. This study included 24 patients (age range from 5.5 to 15 years) with tibial bone defects: 13 patients were treated with bone transport (BT) and 11 patients were treated with a nonvascularized fibular graft (FG). The outcome parameters were bone results (union, deformity, infection, leg-length discrepancy) and functional results: external fixation index and external fixation time. In group A (BT), one patient developed refracture at the regenerate site, whereas, in group B (FG), after removal of the external fixator, one of the FGs developed a stress fracture. The external fixator time in group A was 10.7 months (range 8-14.5) versus 7.8 months (range 4-11.5 months) in group B (FG). In group A (BT), one patient had a limb-length discrepancy (LLD), whereas, in group B (FG), three patients had LLD. The functional and bone results of the Ilizarov BT technique were excellent in 23.1 and 30.8%, good in 38.5 and 46.2, fair in 30.8 and 15.4, and poor in 7.6 and 7.6%, respectively. The poor functional result was related to the poor bone result because of prolonged external fixator time resulting in significant pain, limited ankle motion, whereas the functional and bone results of fibular grafting were excellent in 9.1 and 18.2%, good in 63.6 and 45.5%, fair in 18.2 and 27.2%, and poor in 9.1 and 9.1%, respectively. Segmental tibial defects can be effectively treated with both methods. The FG method provides satisfactory results, with early removal of the external fixator. However, it had a limitation in patients with severe infection and those with LLD. Also, it requires a long duration of limb bracing until adequate hypertrophy of the graft. The Ilizarov method has the advantages of early weight bearing, treatment of postinfection bone defect in a one-stage surgery, and the possibility to treat the associated LLD. However, it has a long external fixation time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27243804     DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B        ISSN: 1060-152X            Impact factor:   1.041


  4 in total

1.  Bone transport versus acute shortening for the management of infected tibial bone defects: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongjie Wen; Shouyan Zhu; Canzhang Li; Yongqing Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Treatment of forearm diaphyseal defect by distraction compression bone transport and continued distraction for radial head reduction: A case study.

Authors:  Nikolay M Kliushin; Paul Stepanenko; Waleed A Mekki
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2019-06-15

Review 3.  Use of Ilizarov Device to Gain Early Range of Motion in the Treatment of Pediatric Talus Body Fractures: A Series of Four Cases and Literature Review.

Authors:  WenTao Zhu; ShuJuan Chu; WenQi Liu; Xin Tang; Qi Li; Saroj Rai
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Bone Transport for Treatment of Traumatic Composite Tibial Bone and Soft Tissue Defects: Any Specific Needs besides the Ilizarov Technique?

Authors:  Runguang Li; Guozheng Zhu; Chaojie Chen; Yirong Chen; Gaohong Ren
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.