Timothy R Sterling1, Nigel A Scott, Jose M Miro, Guilherme Calvet, Alberto La Rosa, Rosa Infante, Michael P Chen, Debra A Benator, Fred Gordin, Constance A Benson, Richard E Chaisson, M Elsa Villarino. 1. aVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee bCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA cHospital Clinic - IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain dInstituto Nacional de Infectologia, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil eAsociacion Civil Impacta Salud y Educacion, Lima, Peru fVeterans Affairs Medical Center gGeorge Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia hUniversity of California at San Diego, California iJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Compare the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of 3 months of weekly rifapentine and isoniazid under direct observation (3HP) versus 9 months of daily isoniazid (9H) in HIV-infected persons. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, and open-label noninferiority trial. SETTING: The United States , Brazil, Spain, Peru, Canada, and Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: HIV-infected persons who were tuberculin skin test positive or close contacts of tuberculosis cases. INTERVENTION: 3HP versus 9H. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effectiveness endpoint was tuberculosis; the noninferiority margin was 0.75%. The tolerability endpoint was treatment completion; the safety endpoint was drug discontinuation because of adverse drug reaction. RESULTS:Median baseline CD4 cell counts were 495 (IQR 389-675) and 538 (IQR 418-729) cells/μl in the 3HP and 9H arms, respectively (P = 0.09). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, there were two tuberculosis cases among 206 persons [517 person-years (p-y) of follow-up] in the 3HP arm (0.39 per 100 p-y) and six tuberculosis cases among 193 persons (481 p-y of follow-up) in the 9H arm (1.25 per 100 p-y). Cumulative tuberculosis rates were 1.01 versus 3.50% in the 3HP and 9H arms, respectively (rate difference: -2.49%; upper bound of the 95% confidence interval of the difference: 0.60%). Treatment completion was higher with 3HP (89%) than 9H (64%) (P < 0.001), and drug discontinuation because of an adverse drug reaction was similar (3 vs. 4%; P = 0.79) in 3HP and 9H, respectively. CONCLUSION: Among HIV-infected persons with median CD4 cell count of approximately 500 cells/μl, 3HP was as effective and safe for treatment of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection as 9H, and better tolerated.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Compare the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of 3 months of weekly rifapentine and isoniazid under direct observation (3HP) versus 9 months of daily isoniazid (9H) in HIV-infectedpersons. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, and open-label noninferiority trial. SETTING: The United States , Brazil, Spain, Peru, Canada, and Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: HIV-infectedpersons who were tuberculin skin test positive or close contacts of tuberculosis cases. INTERVENTION: 3HP versus 9H. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effectiveness endpoint was tuberculosis; the noninferiority margin was 0.75%. The tolerability endpoint was treatment completion; the safety endpoint was drug discontinuation because of adverse drug reaction. RESULTS: Median baseline CD4 cell counts were 495 (IQR 389-675) and 538 (IQR 418-729) cells/μl in the 3HP and 9H arms, respectively (P = 0.09). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, there were two tuberculosis cases among 206 persons [517 person-years (p-y) of follow-up] in the 3HP arm (0.39 per 100 p-y) and six tuberculosis cases among 193 persons (481 p-y of follow-up) in the 9H arm (1.25 per 100 p-y). Cumulative tuberculosis rates were 1.01 versus 3.50% in the 3HP and 9H arms, respectively (rate difference: -2.49%; upper bound of the 95% confidence interval of the difference: 0.60%). Treatment completion was higher with 3HP (89%) than 9H (64%) (P < 0.001), and drug discontinuation because of an adverse drug reaction was similar (3 vs. 4%; P = 0.79) in 3HP and 9H, respectively. CONCLUSION: Among HIV-infectedpersons with median CD4 cell count of approximately 500 cells/μl, 3HP was as effective and safe for treatment of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection as 9H, and better tolerated.
Authors: Neil A Martinson; Grace L Barnes; Lawrence H Moulton; Reginah Msandiwa; Harry Hausler; Malathi Ram; James A McIntyre; Glenda E Gray; Richard E Chaisson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Timothy R Sterling; Ruth N Moro; Andrey S Borisov; Elizabeth Phillips; Gillian Shepherd; Newton Franklin Adkinson; Stephen Weis; Christine Ho; Margarita Elsa Villarino Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Laith J Abu-Raddad; Lorenzo Sabatelli; Jerusha T Achterberg; Jonathan D Sugimoto; Ira M Longini; Christopher Dye; M Elizabeth Halloran Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: C L Daley; P M Small; G F Schecter; G K Schoolnik; R A McAdam; W R Jacobs; P C Hopewell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-01-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marc Weiner; Eric F Egelund; Melissa Engle; Melissa Kiser; Thomas J Prihoda; Jonathan A L Gelfond; William Mac Kenzie; Charles A Peloquin Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2013-12-15 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Huldrych F Günthard; Michael S Saag; Constance A Benson; Carlos del Rio; Joseph J Eron; Joel E Gallant; Jennifer F Hoy; Michael J Mugavero; Paul E Sax; Melanie A Thompson; Rajesh T Gandhi; Raphael J Landovitz; Davey M Smith; Donna M Jacobsen; Paul A Volberding Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Suzanne M Marks; David W Dowdy; Nicolas A Menzies; Priya B Shete; Joshua A Salomon; Andrea Parriott; Sourya Shrestha; Jennifer Flood; Andrew N Hill Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2020 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: S Swindells; M Siccardi; S E Barrett; D B Olsen; J A Grobler; A T Podany; E Nuermberger; P Kim; C E Barry; A Owen; D Hazuda; C Flexner Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Gibril J Njie; Sapna Bamrah Morris; Rachel Yelk Woodruff; Ruth N Moro; Andrew A Vernon; Andrey S Borisov Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Kristina M Brooks; Jomy M George; Alice K Pau; Adam Rupert; Carolina Mehaffy; Prithwiraj De; Karen M Dobos; Anela Kellogg; Mary McLaughlin; Maryellen McManus; Raul M Alfaro; Colleen Hadigan; Joseph A Kovacs; Parag Kumar Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 9.079