Mark E Kunik1,2,3, Whitney L Mills1,2, Amber B Amspoker1,2, Jeffrey A Cully1,2,3, Cynthia Kraus-Schuman2,4, Melinda Stanley1,2,3, Nancy L Wilson1,2. 1. a Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Houston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality , Effectiveness and Safety , Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston , TX , USA. 2. b Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine , Houston , TX , USA. 3. c South Central Mental Illness Research , Education and Clinical Center , Houston , TX , USA. 4. d Mental Health Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center , Houston , TX , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We evaluate policy and practice strategies for bolstering the geriatric mental healthcare workforce and describe costs and considerations of implementing one approach. METHOD: Narrative overview of the literature and policy retrieved from searches of databases, hand searches, and authoritative texts. We identified three proposed strategies to increase the geriatric mental healthcare workforce: (1) production of more geriatric mental health providers; (2) team-based care; and (3) non-licensed providers. We evaluate each in terms of challenges and potential and provide estimates of costs, policy, and practice considerations for training, employing, and supervising non-licensed mental health providers. RESULTS: Use of non-licensed providers is key to reforms needed to allow a more older adults to access necessary mental healthcare. Licensed and non-licensed providers have achieved similar improvements for generalized anxiety disorder among patients, although non-licensed providers did so at a lower cost. CONCLUSION: Supervised non-licensed providers can extend the reach of licensed providers for specific mental health conditions, resulting in lower costs and increased number of patients treated. Although several barriers to implementation exist, policy and infrastructure changes that may support this type of care delivery model are emerging from reforms in financing and associated delivery initiatives created by the Affordable Care Act.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluate policy and practice strategies for bolstering the geriatric mental healthcare workforce and describe costs and considerations of implementing one approach. METHOD: Narrative overview of the literature and policy retrieved from searches of databases, hand searches, and authoritative texts. We identified three proposed strategies to increase the geriatric mental healthcare workforce: (1) production of more geriatric mental health providers; (2) team-based care; and (3) non-licensed providers. We evaluate each in terms of challenges and potential and provide estimates of costs, policy, and practice considerations for training, employing, and supervising non-licensed mental health providers. RESULTS: Use of non-licensed providers is key to reforms needed to allow a more older adults to access necessary mental healthcare. Licensed and non-licensed providers have achieved similar improvements for generalized anxiety disorder among patients, although non-licensed providers did so at a lower cost. CONCLUSION: Supervised non-licensed providers can extend the reach of licensed providers for specific mental health conditions, resulting in lower costs and increased number of patients treated. Although several barriers to implementation exist, policy and infrastructure changes that may support this type of care delivery model are emerging from reforms in financing and associated delivery initiatives created by the Affordable Care Act.
Entities:
Keywords:
Healthcare workforce; cognitive behavioral therapy; community health worker; mental health services; older adults
Authors: Arthur L Kellermann; John W Saultz; Ateev Mehrotra; Spencer S Jones; Siddartha Dalal Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jürgen Unützer; Wayne Katon; Christopher M Callahan; John W Williams; Enid Hunkeler; Linda Harpole; Marc Hoffing; Richard D Della Penna; Polly Hitchcock Noël; Elizabeth H B Lin; Patricia A Areán; Mark T Hegel; Lingqi Tang; Thomas R Belin; Sabine Oishi; Christopher Langston Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Howard Waitzkin; Christina Getrich; Shirley Heying; Laura Rodríguez; Anita Parmar; Cathleen Willging; Joel Yager; Richard Santos Journal: J Community Health Date: 2011-04