Literature DB >> 27243215

Performance of 177Lu-DOTATATE-based peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: a multiparametric response evaluation correlating with primary tumor site, tumor proliferation index, and dual tracer imaging characteristics.

Pradeep Thapa1, Rohit Ranade, Vikas Ostwal, Shailesh V Shrikhande, Mahesh Goel, Sandip Basu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) and correlate it with primary tumor site, tumor proliferation index, and dual tracer imaging characteristics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (M : F 33 : 17, age: 26-71 years) with histopathologically confirmed metastatic/inoperable NETs who had undergone at least three cycles of PRRT with Lu-DOTATATE were included in the analysis. As part of the pretreatment evaluation, they underwent either Tc-HYNIC TOC (n=40)/Ga-DOTATATE PET (n=10) or fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET-computed tomography (CT). Response was assessed after three and five cycles PRRT on the basis of three parameters: (a) symptomatic and subjective scale, (b) biochemical tumor marker level, and (c) objective imaging (F-FDG/Ga DOTATATE PET/CT, Tc-HYNIC TOC, ceCT), and was categorized using predefined criteria (detailed in methods). Stable disease on imaging assessment with response on symptomatic or biochemical tumor marker scales or both were included in the responder group.
RESULTS: The study population was broadly classified into (a) metastatic GEP-NET with known primary (n=43 i.e. 86%), which was further subclassified according to the site of primary and (b) those with unknown primary (n=7 i.e. 14%). Symptomatic response: 96% of patients showed a symptomatic response or improvement in health-related quality of life, irrespective of tumor proliferation index, dual tracer imaging characteristics, and response or progression of disease in the scan. Biochemical tumor marker response: 83% of scan responders showed a decrease, 10% showed a stable value, and 7% showed an increase in tumor marker levels. Among the scan nonresponders, 67% patients showed a corresponding increase in the tumor marker level, 22% patient showed a decrease, whereas 11% showed stable values. Scan response: 31 out of total 50 patients (62%) showed a partial scan response with either a decrease in the number of somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive lesions or metabolic activity in F-FDG/Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT or both, 10 patients (20%) showed stable disease, and nine patients (18%) showed progressive disease. The higher objective partial scan response documented can be explained by the introduction of the F-FDG-PET/CT parameter as a determinant criterion. Among the responders category (n=41), 32 (78.04%) showed discordance between F-FDG-PET/CT-based and SSTR-based imaging, whereas eight out of nine patients with nonresponse category (88.89%) showed concordance between SSTR-based imaging and F-FDG-PET/CT. Conversely, 32 of 33 patients (96.97%) with SSTR/F-FDG discordance and nine out of 17 (52.94%) with concordance were finally classified as responders, whereas the remaining, that is, 1/33 (3.03%) in the 'discordant' category and 8/17 (47.06%) with imaging concordance were classified as nonresponders, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our data show that high pretherapy F-FDG maximum standardized uptake values were associated with increased chances of treatment refractoriness in GEP-NETs. However, symptomatic improvement was observed in most cases irrespective of grade and F-FDG uptake. High pretherapy F-FDG maximum standardized uptake value in both low-grade and high-grade NET predicted a poor outcome and was associated with disease progression. Introduction of F-FDG-PET/CT parameter as a determinant of response classification increases the percentage of objective scan responders among patients with grades I and II GEP-NETs as F-FDG activity was observed to decrease before SSTR-based imaging and more frequently compared with the latter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27243215     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  14 in total

1.  Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy With 177Lu-Octreotate in Patients With Somatostatin Receptor Expressing Neuroendocrine Tumors: Six Years' Assessment.

Authors:  Mohammadali Hamiditabar; Muzammil Ali; Joseph Roys; Edward M Wolin; Thomas M OʼDorisio; David Ranganathan; Izabela Tworowska; Jonathan R Strosberg; Ebrahim S Delpassand
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.794

2.  Vertebral metastases from neuroendocrine tumours: How to avoid false positives on 68Ga-DOTA-TOC PET using CT pattern analysis?

Authors:  Mathieu Gauthé; Nathalie Testart Dardel; Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Jessica Ohnona; Valérie Nataf; Françoise Montravers; Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, current status, and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.512

4.  Detection rate of unknown primary tumour by using somatostatin receptor PET/CT in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara De Dosso; Giorgio Treglia; Mariarosa Pascale; Adriana Tamburello; Prasanna Santhanam; Alexander S Kroiss; Ricardo Pereira Mestre; Piercarlo Saletti; Luca Giovanella
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  One decade of 'Bench-to-Bedside' peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with indigenous [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE obtained through 'Direct' neutron activation route: lessons learnt including practice evolution in an Indian setting.

Authors:  Sandip Basu; Sudipta Chakraborty; Rahul V Parghane; Rohit Ranade; Pradeep Thapa; Ramesh V Asopa; Geeta Sonawane; Swapna Nabar; Hemant Shimpi; Ashok Chandak; K V Vimalnath; Vikas Ostwal; Anant Ramaswamy; Manish Bhandare; Vikram Chaudhari; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Bhawna Sirohi; Ashutosh Dash; Sharmila Banerjee
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-08-25

Review 6.  Management of neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary.

Authors:  Krystallenia Alexandraki; Anna Angelousi; Georgios Boutzios; Georgios Kyriakopoulos; Dimitra Rontogianni; Gregory Kaltsas
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  Eruption of Metastatic Paraganglioma After Successful Therapy with 177Lu/90Y-DOTATOC and 177Lu-DOTATATE.

Authors:  Katherine I Wolf; Abhishek Jha; Anouk van Berkel; Damian Wild; Ingo Janssen; Corina M Millo; M J R Janssen; Melissa K Gonzales; Henri J K M Timmers; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-02-22

8.  177Lu-DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Metastatic or Advanced and Inoperable Primary Neuroendocrine Tumors of Rare Sites.

Authors:  Pradeep Thapa; Rahul Parghane; Sandip Basu
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

9.  Three-dimensional Monte Carlo-based voxel-wise tumor dosimetry in patients with neuroendocrine tumors who underwent 177Lu-DOTATOC therapy.

Authors:  Th I Goetz; E W Lang; O Prante; A Maier; M Cordes; T Kuwert; P Ritt; Christian Schmidkonz
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 2.668

10.  North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Guide for Neuroendocrine Tumor Patient Health Care Providers During COVID-19.

Authors:  Emily K Bergsland; Daniel M Halperin; Joseph S Dillon; N Arvind Dasari; Pamela L Kunz; Heloisa P Soares; Daniel Pryma; Lisa Bodei; Thomas Hope; Michael C Soulen; Josh Mailman; James R Howe
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.