| Literature DB >> 27242948 |
Mahipal S Shekhawat1, M Manokari1, C P Ravindran1.
Abstract
A tissue culture protocol was developed for an important medicinal plant Rungia pectinata L. in the present study. Nodal shoots were used as explants and surface-sterilized with 0.1% HgCl2 solution. Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium was used to establish the cultures of R. pectinata. The bud break was reported on MS medium supplemented with 1.0 mg L(-1) 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP). About 98% response was observed with this media combination and maximum 3.2 shoots per explant with 4.3 cm length were recorded. The shoots were further multiplied using MS medium augmented with 0.5 mg L(-1) each of BAP and kinetin (Kin) + 0.1 mg L(-1) indole-3 acetic acid (IAA). Maximum 13.2 shoots per explant with 5.2 cm length were observed. All the shoots were rooted (4.9 roots per shoot with 3.5 cm length) on half strength MS medium fortified with 2.0 mg L(-1) indole-3 butyric acid (IBA). In vitro flowering was induced from the shoots on half strength MS medium supplemented with same concentrations and combinations of growth regulators used for shoot multiplication under 12/12 hr light/dark photoperiod. The plantlets were hardened in the greenhouse for two months and finally transferred to the field. The foliar micromorphological studies revealed the developmental changes in stomata, vein density, and trichomes during the culture of shoots under in vitro conditions.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27242948 PMCID: PMC4876001 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5813851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scientifica (Cairo) ISSN: 2090-908X
Effect of cytokinins on induction of shoots from nodal segments of R. pectinata.
| Conc. of cytokinins (mg L−1) | Response (%) | Shoot number (mean ± SD) | Shoot length (cm) (mean ± SD) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | Kin | |||
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 ± 0.00a | 0.0 ± 0.00a |
| 0.5 | — | 75 | 1.2 ± 0.11b | 3.0 ± 0.20e |
| 1.0 | — | 98 | 3.2 ± 0.10f | 4.3 ± 0.13d |
| 1.5 | — | 86 | 1.7 ± 0.21d | 3.2 ± 0.21d |
| 2.0 | — | 72 | 1.0 ± 0.24b | 2.8 ± 0.14b |
| 3.0 | — | 60 | 1.2 ± 0.17b | 1.5 ± 0.21b |
| — | 0.5 | 59 | 1.5 ± 0.20c | 1.8 ± 0.10c |
| — | 1.0 | 74 | 2.0 ± 0.15e | 2.2 ± 0.26d |
| — | 1.5 | 76 | 1.2 ± 0.24b | 2.8 ± 0.14c |
| — | 2.0 | 65 | 1.4 ± 0.40c | 2.0 ± 0.31b |
| — | 3.0 | 52 | 1.0 ± 0.16b | 1.7 ± 0.19b |
Note. Mean separation was analyzed by ANOVA using SPSS software (ver. 16.0); the values represented in corresponding column followed by same letters are not significantly different according to DMRT at P < 0.05.
Figure 1(a) Induction of shoots from the nodal meristems of the explants. (b) Multiplication of shoots of R. pectinata. (c) In vitro flowering in R. pectinata. (d) Induction of roots from the in vitro regenerated shoots in half strength MS medium with IBA. (e) Stages in hardening of plantlets in the greenhouse.
Effect of different concentrations of cytokinins (BAP and Kin) combined with IAA on multiplication of shoots.
| Conc. of BAP and Kin (mg L−1) | Conc. of IAA (mg L−1) | Shoot number | Shoot length (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a |
| 0.25 | — | 6.3 ± 1.2c | 5.3 ± 0.4g |
| 0.5 | — | 9.5 ± 1.9d | 5.9 ± 0.3d |
| 1.0 | — | 7.3 ± 1.0c | 4.2 ± 0.6e |
| 1.5 | — | 6.6 ± 1.3b | 4.7 ± 0.1b |
| 2.0 | — | 5.4 ± 1.0h | 5.0 ± 0.5h |
| 0.5 | 0.1 | 13.2 ± 1.6f | 5.2 ± 0.0f |
| 0.5 | 0.2 | 9.3 ± 0.9c | 4.5 ± 0.7c |
| 0.5 | 0.3 | 8.1 ± 1.0b | 4.0 ± 0.2b |
| 0.5 | 0.4 | 5.2 ± 0.7h | 3.5 ± 0.3b |
Note. Mean separation was analyzed by ANOVA using SPSS software (ver. 16.0); the values represented in corresponding column followed by same letters are not significantly different according to DMRT at P < 0.05.
Effect of photoperiod on in vitro flowering of R. pectinata on half strength MS medium after 4 weeks of culture.
| Photoperiod (hr/d) (light/dark) | Percentage of shoots producing inflorescence |
|---|---|
| 12/12 | 80 |
| 16/8 | 68 |
| 8/16 | 00 |
Effect of auxins on in vitro root induction of R. pectinata on half strength MS medium.
| PGR and its concentration (mg L−1) | Response (%) | Root number | Root length (cm) (mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a |
|
| |||
| IAA | |||
| 1.0 | 60 | 2.5 ± 0.16a | 1.10 ± 0.24b |
| 2.0 | 72 | 2.8 ± 0.21c | 2.80 ± 0.17e |
| 3.0 | 69 | 3.6 ± 0.29e | 2.00 ± 0.22c |
| 4.0 | 60 | 2.4 ± 0.10b | 1.28 ± 0.38b |
|
| |||
| IBA | |||
| 1.0 | 91 | 3.7 ± 0.13e | 2.71 ± 0.29e |
| 2.0 | 95 | 4.9 ± 0.22f | 3.50 ± 0.15g |
| 3.0 | 87 | 3.2 ± 0.10d | 3.00 ± 0.40f |
| 4.0 | 70 | 2.6 ± 0.07c | 2.50 ± 0.23d |
|
| |||
| NAA | |||
| 1.0 | 67 | 2.8 ± 0.21c | 2.14 ± 0.41c |
| 2.0 | 75 | 2.6 ± 0.30c | 2.37 ± 0.23e |
| 3.0 | 68 | 2.7 ± 0.33c | 2.15 ± 0.45c |
| 4.0 | 61 | 2.0 ± 0.24b | 1.40 ± 0.19b |
Note. Mean separation was analyzed by ANOVA using SPSS software (ver. 16.0); the values represented in corresponding column followed by same letters are not significantly different according to DMRT at P < 0.05.
Figure 2(a) Venation pattern in leaves of in vitro raised shoots; (b) multicellular, nonglandular trichome (scale bar 50.0 µm, 100.0 µm).