| Literature DB >> 27242165 |
Baerbel Keller1, Irina Zaidman2, O Sascha Yousefi3, Dov Hershkovitz4, Jerry Stein5, Susanne Unger1, Kristina Schachtrup1, Mikael Sigvardsson6, Amir A Kuperman7, Avraham Shaag8, Wolfgang W Schamel9, Orly Elpeleg8, Klaus Warnatz10, Polina Stepensky11.
Abstract
The adapter protein linker for activation of T cells (LAT) is a critical signaling hub connecting T cell antigen receptor triggering to downstream T cell responses. In this study, we describe the first kindred with defective LAT signaling caused by a homozygous mutation in exon 5, leading to a premature stop codon deleting most of the cytoplasmic tail of LAT, including the critical tyrosine residues for signal propagation. The three patients presented from early childhood with combined immunodeficiency and severe autoimmune disease. Unlike in the mouse counterpart, reduced numbers of T cells were present in the patients. Despite the reported nonredundant role of LAT in Ca(2+) mobilization, residual T cells were able to induce Ca(2+) influx and nuclear factor (NF) κB signaling, whereas extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling was completely abolished. This is the first report of a LAT-related disease in humans, manifesting by a progressive combined immune deficiency with severe autoimmune disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27242165 PMCID: PMC4925012 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20151110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Med ISSN: 0022-1007 Impact factor: 14.307
Figure 1.Pedigree of the affected family. Circles represent female and squares represent male subjects. Solid symbols show homozygous affected patients, and crossed-out symbols stand for deceased subjects. N, wild type. del, deletion.
Summary of major clinical and laboratory findings
| Patient 1, male | Patient 2, male | Patient 3, female | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 mo | 6 mo | 10 mo | |
| Recurrent pneumonia, EBV/CMV viremia, CMV pneumonia | Congenital toxoplasmosis, recurrent pneumonia, varicella infection, CMV viremia, Candida pneumonia adenovirus + CMV PCR positive in BAL | Recurrent pneumonia, urinary infections, gastroenteritis, CMV viremia | |
| Coombs+ AIHA, ITP, autoimmune neutropenia | Coombs+ AIHA, ITP | Anti-ADAMTS13+ microangiopathic hemolytic anemia | |
| Lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly | Lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly | Lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly | |
| Chronic lung disease, bronchiectasis | Chronic lung disease, bronchiectasis | No | |
| Red-brown rash on face and legs | Diplegic cerebral palsy due to congenital toxoplasmosis, red-brown rash on forearm | No | |
| Steroids, IgG-RT, splenectomy | Steroids, IgG-RT | Steroids, plasmapheresis | |
| Died at 9 yr due to disseminated CMV infection | Alive, 8 yr old, 13 mo after HSCT | Died at 2 yr due to TTP | |
| Progressive hypogammaglobulinemia | Progressive hypogammaglobulinemia | Hypergammaglobulinemia | |
| <4 yr: | <3.5 yr: | ||
| normal | normal to rather increased | ||
| 4 yr: | 3.5 yr: | 2 yr: | |
| IgG 1.6 g/liter (5.4–13.4 g/liter) | IgG 1.3 g/liter (5.4–13.4 g/liter) | IgG 20.45 g/liter (4.7–12.3 g/liter) | |
| IgA <0.16 g/liter (0.3–1.9 g/liter) | IgA 0.69 g/liter (0.3–1.9 g/liter) | IgA 1.02 g/liter (0.2–1.4 g/liter) | |
| IgM 0.12 g/liter (0.4–1.7 g/liter) | IgM 0.84 g/liter (0.4–1.7 g/liter) | IgM 0.89 g/liter (0.4–1.5 g/liter) | |
| IgE 2 IU/ml (<58 IU/ml) | IgE 286 IU/ml (<29 IU/ml) | ||
| 8 yr: | |||
| IgG <2 g/liter (6.5–15.3 g/liter) | |||
| IgA <0.26 g/liter (0.5–2.5 g/liter) | |||
| IgM 0.39 g/liter (0.4–1.9 g/liter) | |||
| Hepatitis A+, HSV1+, Hepatitis B−, measles−, mumps−, rubella− | ND | rubella+, measles−, EBV+, CMV− | |
| Progressive lymphopenia, high γδ T cells, low CD4 T cells | Progressive lymphopenia, high γδ T cells, low CD4 T cells, low B cells | High γδ T cells |
AIHA, autoimmune hemolytic anemia; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IgG-RT, Ig replacement therapy; ITP, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura; TTP, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Values in parentheses depict age-matched reference values.
Immune phenotype of patient 1, 2, and 3
| Patient 1 (6 yr) | Patient 2 (8 yr) | Patient 3 (2 yr) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative counts | Reference values | Absolute | Reference values | Relative counts | Reference values | Absolute | Reference values | Relative counts | Reference values | Absolute | Reference values | |||
| 1,855 | 1,800–5,000 | 900 | 1,800–5,000 | 4,950 | 2,800–6,400 | |||||||||
| 2.0 | 8.5–20.2 | 37 | 296–784 | 3.8 | 8.5–20.2 | 34 | 296–784 | 29.9 | 17.3–30.0 | 1,480 | 686–1,732 | |||
| 4.0 | 26.5–41.4 | 74 | 641–1,453 | 24.5 | 26.5–41.4 | 220 | 641–1,453 | 6.4 | 28.1–43.2 | 317 | 925–2,477 | |||
| 45.0 | 13–47 | 834 | 200–1,700 | 38.3 | 13–47 | 345 | 200–1,700 | 4.5 | 9–49 | 223 | 200–1,800 | |||
| 6.0 | 2–31 | 114 | 70–590 | 1.7 | 2–31 | 16 | 70–590 | 0.9 | 2–25 | 45 | 61–510 | |||
| ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||||||||
| Transitional | 21.1 | 3.4–9.0 | 5 | 13–63 | ||||||||||
| Naive | 68.7 | 47.8–69.8 | 23 | 154–413 | ||||||||||
| IgM memory | 3.5 | 6.3–22 | 2 | 24–135 | ||||||||||
| IgM only | 0.7 | 2–11.8 | 1 | 7–65 | ||||||||||
| IgA cs memory | 0 | 1.1–6.1 | 0 | 5–35 | ||||||||||
| IgG cs memory | 0 | 2.7–14 | 0 | 13–74 | ||||||||||
| CD21low | 6.3 | |||||||||||||
| ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||||||||
| RTE | 24.4 | 61–84.2 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Naive | 2.4 | 55.6–75.8 | 5 | 375–1,096 | ||||||||||
| CD45R0 | 97.5 | 24–43 | ||||||||||||
| T reg cells | 2.0 | 2.3–7.7 | 5 | 18–86 | ||||||||||
| cTFH | 35.0 | 18.4–29.9 | 112 | 51–218 | ||||||||||
| Th2+Th17-like cTFH | 29.4 | 39.9–66.1 | 33 | 26–85 | ||||||||||
| ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||||||||
| Naive | 0.3 | 16–100 | 1 | 42–1,300 | ||||||||||
| Central memory | 2.4 | 1–6 | 8 | 6–43 | ||||||||||
| Effector memory | 65.9 | 5–100 | 227 | 45–410 | ||||||||||
| Terminally differentiated | 1.6 | 15–41 | 6 | 57–340 | ||||||||||
| ND | ND | 37.2 | <10 | 282 | 12–175 | 72 | <10 | 2,217 | 12–175 | |||||
| 51 | 38 | 72 | ||||||||||||
| ND | ND | 0.005 | >0.01 | ND | ND | ND | ||||||||
Relative counts are shown as a percentage of parental population. Absolute numbers refer to cells/microliter. CD4 T cell subpopulations: recent thymic emigrants (RTEs), CD31+ of CD45RA+ CD4 T cells; T reg cells, CD127− CD25hi of CD45RA− CD4 T cells; circulating T follicular helper–like cell (cTFH), CXCR5+ of CD45RA− CD4 T cells; Th2/Th17-like cTFH, CXCR3− of CXCR5+ CD45RA− CD4 T cells. CD8 T cell populations: naive, CCR7+ CD45RA+ CD27+; terminally differentiated, CCR7− CD45RA+ CD27−; central memory, CCR7+ CD45RA− CD27+; effector memory, CCR7− CD45RA− CD27−. Double-negative (DN) T cells, CD4−/CD8− of CD3 T cells. NK T cells, Vα24 Vβ11 CD3 T cells. cs, class switched.
van Gent et al., 2009.
Schatorjé et al., 2012.
Percentage of naive CD4 T cells.
Internal reference value.
Internal reference value of CD3 T cells.
Figure 2.Molecular characterization of LAT mutation. (A) Genomic DNA sequence around the c.268_269delGG mutation site (arrows) of a patient (top), a parent (middle), and an unrelated healthy control (ctrl; bottom). (B) Schematic view of wild-type LAT showing the extracellular region (ER), the transmembrane domain (TM), and the intracellular region (IR) with the four tyrosine residues phosphorylated downstream of TCR signaling. Below is the mutated form of the protein. The presumptive position of the frame shift starting at 89 aa and the presumed truncation after 100 aa is shown in red. (C) Relative mRNA expression of LAT with hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase as the housekeeping gene is shown in CD4 CD45R0 T cells of patient 2 and three controls normalized to Jurkat cells. (D) FACS plot for LAT expression gated on CD4 CD45R0 T cells and graph of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of LAT in CD4 and CD8 T cells in patient 2, the heterozygous sister, and three healthy controls. (E) Anti-FLAG staining and ZsGreen1 expression are shown in J.CaM2.5 cells expressing the recombinant wild-type (LATwt) or the mutated LAT protein (LATmut). (F) Immunodetection of FLAG-tagged LATwt or LATmut in J.CaM2.5 cells. The immunoblot is representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 3.TCR-induced signaling in LAT (A–D) All experiments were performed in LAT-deficient J.CaM2.5 cells and J.CaM2.5 cells reconstituted with LATwt or LATmut. (A) Immunoblot of ZAP70 and PLCγ1 phosphorylation with or without stimulation with 5 µg/ml anti-CD3 for 3 min. (B) Phosphorylation of ITK (pITK) with or without stimulation with 5 µg/ml anti-CD3 for 2 min. (C) Ca2+ mobilization after anti-CD3 stimulation. (D) Phosphorylation of ERK (pERK) after 2-min anti-CD3 stimulation and up-regulation of CD69 after overnight stimulation. All results are representative of three to five independent experiments.
Figure 4.TCR signaling in primary LAT-mutated T cells. (A) Expression of CD3 on CD4 (left) and CD8 T cells (right) in three different experiments compared with controls. Patient 2 is shown in red, and controls are in blue. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. ns, not significant. ***, P ≤ 0.001. (B and C) Phosphorylation of ITK (pITK; B) and ERK (pERK; C) in patient’s and controls’ CD45R0 and CD45RA CD4 T cells without (closed) and after CD3 stimulation (open). Results are representative of five and four independent experiments. (D) Ca2+ mobilization after cross-linking of CD3 is depicted in CD45R0 CD4 T cells and CD45R0 CD8 T cells of two controls and the LAT-mutated patient 2. Arrows indicate the addition of goat anti-mouse for CD3 cross-linking and ionomycin. The graph shows the relative Ca2+ influx determined by the peak of Indo-1 bound/unbound normalized to the highest day control in three independent experiments. (E) Degradation of IκBα is shown in CD45R0 CD4 T cells of patient 2 and a healthy control after stimulation with anti-CD3/anti-CD28. Results are representative of two independent experiments. ctrl, control. unst, unstimulated.
Figure 5.Analysis of alternative adapter molecules in LAT-mutated T cells. (A) Volcano plot displaying the p-value versus log2 fold change in gene expression of selected adapter molecules in CD4 CD45R0 T cells of patient 2 compared with the mean expression value (base mean) of two controls determined by RNA sequencing. (B) Expression of LAB/NTAL in patient 2, the heterozygous sibling, and three controls. (C) CD6 expression in primary T cells of patient 2 and a healthy control (ctrl) and in LAT-transduced or nontransduced J.CaM2.5 cell lines (representative of two and four independent experiments, respectively). (D) CD6 and ZsGreen1 expression after transduction of a CD6 expression vector in J.CaM2.5, J.CaM2.5-LATwt, and J.CaM2.5-LATmut cells (top). Ca2+ mobilization in CD6-negative (CD6neg) versus CD6-positive (CD6pos) J.CaM2.5, J.CaM2.5-LATwt, and J.CaM2.5-LATmut cells after anti-CD3 stimulation (bottom). The results are representative of four independent experiments. iono, ionomycin.
Figure 6.Lymphocyte function. (A) IL-4 and IFN-γ production in the unstimulated situation and after stimulation with PMA/ionomycin in the LAT-mutated patient and a control (top). The graphs show the percentage of IL-4– (IL-4pos) and IFN-γ–positive (IFN-γpos) cells of CD4 CD45R0 T cells in patient 2 (red) compared with healthy day controls (blue). The standard deviation of 58 healthy controls is depicted in gray. IL-17 (bottom left) and IL-2 (bottom right) production after PMA/ionomycin (Iono) treatment in CD45R0 CD4 T cells of patient 2 and one or two controls, respectively. Numbers indicate the percentage of positive cells in the respective parental subpopulation (three independent experiments). (B) Up-regulation of CD69, ICOS, and CD25 in the LAT-mutated patient (red) and a control (blue) after stimulation with anti-CD3 (continuous line) and anti-CD3/anti-CD28 (dashed line). Results are representative of two independent experiments. (C) Proliferation of CD4 T cells after stimulation with anti-CD3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28, and PHA (two independent experiments). unst, unstimulated. (D) CTL degranulation is shown by the up-regulation of CD107a in CD8 T cells after stimulation with CD3/CD28 beads. (E) NK cell degranulation measured by the surface expression of CD107a after incubation of PBMCs with K562 target cells (two independent experiments). ctrl, control.
Figure 7.γδ T cells in LAT mutation. (A) FACS plots of γδ and αβ T cells in patient 2 and in a representative healthy control (top) and distribution of Vδ1 versus Vδ2 expression gated on γδ T cells (bottom). (B) Ca2+ mobilization in γδ T cells in the patient and a control. The arrow indicates the addition of goat anti-mouse for CD3 cross-linking. The experiment was performed once. (C) Percentage of spontaneous IL-4 producer (IL-4pos) and IFN-γ–positive (IFN-γpos) γδ T cells after PMA/ionomycin stimulation in two independent experiments compared with three healthy controls each. ctrl, control.