Literature DB >> 27242106

Maintenance fluid practices in intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand.

Shailesh Bihari1, Nicola R Watts2, Ian Seppelt2, Kelly Thompson2, Ashleigh Myburgh2, Shivesh Prakash3, Andrew Bersten3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Administration of maintenance fluid is common practice in the intensive care unit, contributing to daily fluid and sodium intake and balance. Despite this, there is little evidence to describe clinical practices relating to its administration to ICU patients.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational, point-prevalence study in 49 Australian and New Zealand ICUs in 2014. We aimed to document the type and volume of maintenance fluid administered to ICU patients, and to describe additional fluid received. We also assessed changes in maintenance fluid administration practices compared with our similar study conducted in 2011.
RESULTS: Of 645 patients enrolled, 399 (62%) received maintenance fluid on the study day. A median volume of 630 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 272-1250 mL) was delivered, accounting for a median of 35% (IQR, 16%- 56%) of total daily administered fluids. This was in addition to other fluids administered as fluid resuscitation, drug infusions and boluses, flushes and enteral or parenteral feeds, as well as oral intake. 0.9% saline was the most commonly used maintenance fluid (36%), followed by balanced salt solutions (30%). Compared with data from 2011, there has been a decrease in the median volume of maintenance fluid administered (2011, 860 mL [IQR, 360- 1533 mL]; 2014, 630 mL [IQR, 287-1328 mL]; P = 0.01), although the proportion of patients receiving maintenance fluid remains unchanged. There has been no change in the types of fluids most commonly used for maintenance, but the use of balanced salt solutions has increased (2011, 24%; 2014, 30%; P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Administration of maintenance fluids to patients in Australian and New Zealand ICUs is common. Although the volume being delivered has decreased, maintenance fluids contribute over one-third of daily total fluid administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27242106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Resusc        ISSN: 1441-2772            Impact factor:   2.159


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intravenous fluid therapy in sepsis.

Authors:  Kevin P Seitz; Edward T Qian; Matthew W Semler
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.204

Review 2.  Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: risk factors, pathophysiology and treatment.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Effect of isotonic versus hypotonic maintenance fluid therapy on urine output, fluid balance, and electrolyte homeostasis: a crossover study in fasting adult volunteers.

Authors:  N Van Regenmortel; T De Weerdt; A H Van Craenenbroeck; E Roelant; W Verbrugghe; K Dams; M L N G Malbrain; T Van den Wyngaert; P G Jorens
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Fluid Stewardship During Critical Illness: A Call to Action.

Authors:  W Anthony Hawkins; Susan E Smith; Andrea Sikora Newsome; John R Carr; Christopher M Bland; Trisha N Branan
Journal:  J Pharm Pract       Date:  2019-06-30

5.  Maintenance fluid therapy and fluid creep impose more significant fluid, sodium, and chloride burdens than resuscitation fluids in critically ill patients: a retrospective study in a tertiary mixed ICU population.

Authors:  Niels Van Regenmortel; Walter Verbrugghe; Ella Roelant; Tim Van den Wyngaert; Philippe G Jorens
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 17.440

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.