Literature DB >> 27241828

Evaluation of five commercial methods for the extraction and purification of DNA from human faecal samples for downstream molecular detection of the enteric protozoan parasites Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Entamoeba spp.

Silvia Paulos1, Marta Mateo2, Aida de Lucio3, Marta Hernández-de Mingo3, Begoña Bailo3, José M Saugar3, Guillermo A Cardona4, Isabel Fuentes3, María Mateo5, David Carmena6.   

Abstract

High quality, pure DNA is required for ensuring reliable and reproducible results in molecular diagnosis applications. A number of in-house and commercial methods are available for the extraction and purification of genomic DNA from faecal material, each one offering a specific combination of performance, cost-effectiveness, and easiness of use that should be conveniently evaluated in function of the pathogen of interest. In this comparative study the marketed kits QIAamp DNA stool mini (Qiagen), SpeedTools DNA extraction (Biotools), DNAExtract-VK (Vacunek), PowerFecal DNA isolation (MoBio), and Wizard magnetic DNA purification system (Promega Corporation) were assessed for their efficacy in obtaining DNA of the most relevant enteric protozoan parasites associated to gastrointestinal disease globally. A panel of 113 stool specimens of clinically confirmed patients with cryptosporidiosis (n=29), giardiasis (n=47) and amoebiasis by Entamoeba histolytica (n=3) or E. dispar (n=10) and apparently healthy subjects (n=24) were used for this purpose. Stool samples were aliquoted in five sub-samples and individually processed by each extraction method evaluated. Purified DNA samples were subsequently tested in PCR-based assays routinely used in our laboratory. The five compared methods yielded amplifiable amounts of DNA of the pathogens tested, although performance differences were observed among them depending on the parasite and the infection burden. Methods combining chemical, enzymatic and/or mechanical lysis procedures at temperatures of at least 56°C were proven more efficient for the release of DNA from Cryptosporidium oocysts.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commercial kit; Cryptosporidium; DNA; Entamoeba dispar; Entamoeba histolytica; Enteric; Extraction; Giardia duodenalis; Protozoan parasites; Purification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27241828     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  14 in total

1.  Comparison Study of Four Extraction Methods Combined with PCR and LAMP for Feline Tritrichomonas foetus Detection in Fecal Samples.

Authors:  Joanna Dąbrowska; Jacek Karamon; Maciej Kochanowski; Jacek Sroka; Jolanta Zdybel; Tomasz Cencek
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-05-22

2.  Real-time PCR detection of Toxoplasma gondii in surface water samples in São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Ana Tereza Galvani; Ana Paula Guarnieri Christ; José Antonio Padula; Mikaela Renata Funada Barbosa; Ronalda Silva de Araújo; Maria Inês Zanoli Sato; Maria Tereza Pepe Razzolini
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Molecular diversity and frequency of the diarrheagenic enteric protozoan Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in a hospital setting in Northern Spain.

Authors:  José Manuel Azcona-Gutiérrez; Aida de Lucio; Marta Hernández-de-Mingo; Concepción García-García; Luis Miguel Soria-Blanco; Lucía Morales; María Aguilera; Isabel Fuentes; David Carmena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Performance and workflow assessment of six nucleic acid extraction technologies for use in resource limited settings.

Authors:  Shivani G Beall; Jason Cantera; Maureen H Diaz; Jonas M Winchell; Lorraine Lillis; Heather White; Michael Kalnoky; James Gallarda; David S Boyle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Patterns of protist diversity associated with raw sewage in New York City.

Authors:  Julia M Maritz; Theresa A Ten Eyck; S Elizabeth Alter; Jane M Carlton
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica.

Authors:  Silvia Paulos; José María Saugar; Aida de Lucio; Isabel Fuentes; María Mateo; David Carmena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparative Study of Eleven Mechanical Pretreatment Protocols for Cryptosporidium parvum DNA Extraction from Stool Samples.

Authors:  Laure Claudel; Nicolas Valeix; Louise Basmaciyan; Bruno Pereira; Damien Costa; Anne Vincent; Stéphane Valot; Loic Favennec; Frederic Dalle
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-02-02

8.  Metabarcoding analysis of eukaryotic microbiota in the gut of HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  Ibrahim Hamad; Rita Abou Abdallah; Isabelle Ravaux; Saadia Mokhtari; Hervé Tissot-Dupont; Caroline Michelle; Andreas Stein; Jean-Christophe Lagier; Didier Raoult; Fadi Bittar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of two DNA extraction methods for the PCR-based detection of eukaryotic enteric pathogens in fecal samples.

Authors:  Estelle Menu; Charles Mary; Isabelle Toga; Didier Raoult; Stéphane Ranque; Fadi Bittar
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-03-27

10.  A Comparative Study of Some Procedures for Isolation of Fruit DNA of Sufficient Quality for PCR-Based Assays.

Authors:  Lenka Fialova; Denisa Romanovska; Ivana Marova
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.