Literature DB >> 27241209

Optimizing surface characteristics for cell adhesion and proliferation on titanium plasma spray coatings on polyetheretherketone.

Byung Jo Victor Yoon1, Fred Xavier1, Brendon R Walker1, Samuel Grinberg1, Frank P Cammisa1, Celeste Abjornson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Titanium plasma spray coating on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a recent innovation to interbody spacer technology. The inherent hydrophobic properties of standard, uncoated PEEK implants can hamper cell attachment and bone healing during fusion. The addition of titanium coating not only offers initial stability due to increased surface roughness but also long-term stability due to bony ongrowth created from osteoconductive microenvironment on the device surface. The previously established hydrophilic and osteophilic properties of commercially pure titanium (CPTi) can potentially provide an ideal environment promoting cell attachment and bony ongrowth when applied at the end plate level of the fusion site. Because the surface material composition and topography is what seems to directly affect cell adhesion, it is important to determine the ideal titanium coating for the highest effectiveness.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to determine whether there is an optimal surface roughness for the titanium coatings and whether different polishing methods have a greater effect than roughness or topography in mediating cell adhesion to the surface. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: The study was divided into two phases. In Phase 1, the effects of varying surface roughnesses on identical polishing method were compared. In Phase 2, the effect of varying polishing methods was compared on identical surface roughnesses.
METHODS: Coating thickness, porosity, and surface roughness were characterized using an optical microscope as per ASTM F 1854 standards. For both phases, PEEK coupons with plasma-sprayed CPTi were used, and human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) at an initial density of 25,000 cells/cm2 were seeded and cultured for 24 hours before fixation in 10% formalin. The cultured hMSCs were visualized by 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining, a fluorescent stain that binds to the DNA of living cells. Samples were imaged using an environmental scanning electron microscope (eSEM) (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, NY, USA) using a backscattered detector.
RESULTS: Image analysis of the CPTi coatings showed uniform and rough surfaces. For Phase 1, roughness was evaluated as fine, medium, and coarse. The eSEM image analysis and cell counting by DAPI demonstrated that hMSCs have a tendency to form stronger adhesion and greater pseudopodia extensions on fine roughness surfaces. Individual hMSCs were seen forming cytoplasmic processes extending across the width of a pore. There was a 4- and 20-fold reduction in adhered hMSCs with an increase to medium and coarse roughnesses, respectively. For Phase 2, studied groups are (1) medium CPTi coating with zirconia polishing, (2) medium CPTi coating with CPTi polishing, and (3) fine CPTi coating with CPTi polishing. The eSEM image analysis and cell counting by DAPI demonstrated that hMSCs have a tendency to form stronger adhesion and greater pseudopodia extensions on Group 3 over the other two groups. There was a twofold reduction in adhered hMSCs on medium roughness relative to fine. No difference in cell adhesion was found between Groups 1 and 2. Individual hMSCs were seen forming cytoplasmic processes extending across the width of a pore.
CONCLUSIONS: Previously, it was accepted without much scrutiny that surface coatings were beneficial. This study begins to discover that surface topography directly affects the potential for cells to adhere and proliferate and lead to greater surgical efficacy.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell adhesion; Instrumentation; PEEK; Polyetheretherketone; Surface coating; Titanium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27241209     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  12 in total

1.  Impact of mechanical stability on the progress of bone ongrowth on the frame surfaces of a titanium-coated PEEK cage and a 3D porous titanium alloy cage: in vivo analysis using CT color mapping.

Authors:  Takahiro Makino; Shota Takaneka; Yusuke Sakai; Hideki Yoshikawa; Takashi Kaito
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Fortifying the Bone-Implant Interface Part 2: An In Vivo Evaluation of 3D-Printed and TPS-Coated Triangular Implants.

Authors:  Regina F MacBarb; Derek P Lindsey; Shane A Woods; Peggy A Lalor; Mukund I Gundanna; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-01

Review 3.  Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages.

Authors:  Jun-Hao Tan; Chin Kai Cheong; Hwee Weng Dennis Hey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Fortifying the Bone-Implant Interface Part 1: An In Vitro Evaluation of 3D-Printed and TPS Porous Surfaces.

Authors:  Regina F MacBarb; Derek P Lindsey; Chelsea S Bahney; Shane A Woods; Mark L Wolfe; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-01

5.  Novel Approach in the Use of Plasma Spray: Preparation of Bulk Titanium for Bone Augmentations.

Authors:  Michaela Fousova; Dalibor Vojtech; Eva Jablonska; Jaroslav Fojt; Jan Lipov
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Elie Massaad; Nida Fatima; Ali Kiapour; Muhamed Hadzipasic; Ganesh M Shankar; John H Shin
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-03-31

7.  Additive-manufactured Ti-6Al-4 V/Polyetheretherketone composite porous cage for Interbody fusion: bone growth and biocompatibility evaluation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Pei-I Tsai; Meng-Huang Wu; Yen-Yao Li; Tzu-Hung Lin; Jane S C Tsai; Hsin-I Huang; Hong-Jen Lai; Ming-Hsueh Lee; Chih-Yu Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Enhancement of the bone-implant interface by applying a plasma-sprayed titanium coating on nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide66 implants in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Weiyang Zhong; Jianxiao Li; Chenbo Hu; Zhengxue Quan; Dianming Jiang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  High-resolution ex vivo analysis of the degradation and osseointegration of Mg-xGd implant screws in 3D.

Authors:  Diana Krüger; Silvia Galli; Berit Zeller-Plumhoff; D C Florian Wieland; Niccolò Peruzzi; Björn Wiese; Philipp Heuser; Julian Moosmann; Ann Wennerberg; Regine Willumeit-Römer
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-11-14

10.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Ti- and CaP-Nanocoated Polyetheretherketone Cages: Comparative Study of the 1-Year Radiological and Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Karel Willems; Philippe Lauweryns; Gino Verleye; Johan VAN Goethem
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.