Literature DB >> 2724114

Contrast sensitivity testing: a more complete assessment of vision.

L F Jindra1, V Zemon.   

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity testing is a powerful tool for determining the capability of the visual system to process spatial and temporal information about the everyday objects we see. The current gold standard in the assessment of vision, visual acuity, provides only a limited amount of information, obtained under artificial conditions. Contrast sensitivity testing measures a range of visual performance under real-life conditions. It measures the least amount of contrast needed to detect a visual stimulus and gives us a more complete quantitization of patients' visual capabilities. Many instances in which losses in contrast sensitivity were detected when visual acuity (one point on the contrast sensitivity function) was normal have been reported. These include amblyopia, neuro-ophthalmology, retina, anterior segment disease, and glaucoma. Therefore, contrast sensitivity testing enables the clinician to diagnose selective deficits in visual processing at an earlier stage than is possible with conventional testing methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2724114     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(89)80002-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  38 in total

1.  Early-stage visual processing deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pamela D Butler; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.741

2.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jongsoo Baek; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Effect of yellow filter on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under glare condition among different age groups.

Authors:  Monireh Mahjoob; Samira Heydarian; Somayyeh Koochi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Luis Lesmes; Peter Bex; Michael Dorr; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Spatial contrast sensitivity: effects of reliability, test-retest repeatability and sample size using the Metropsis software.

Authors:  Thiago Paiva Fernandes; Natalia Leandro de Almeida; Pamela D Butler; Natanael Antonio Santos
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Effect of higher-order aberrations and intraocular scatter on contrast sensitivity measured with a single instrument.

Authors:  Junlei Zhao; Fei Xiao; Haoxin Zhao; Yun Dai; Yudong Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Rapid and reliable assessment of the contrast sensitivity function on an iPad.

Authors:  Michael Dorr; Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  qCSF in clinical application: efficient characterization and classification of contrast sensitivity functions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Luis Lesmes; Li-Xia Feng; Liming Tao; Yi-Feng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Functional vision with hydrogel versus PMMA lens implants.

Authors:  H Weghaupt; R Menapace; A Wedrich
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  The effect of diffuse lamellar keratitis on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity following LASIK.

Authors:  Eui Seok Han; Won Ryang Wee; Jin Hak Lee; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.