Literature DB >> 27241061

Comparing cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetic information available on United States drug labels and European Union Summaries of Product Characteristics.

J Reis-Pardal1, A Rodrigues2, E Rodrigues3, F Fernandez-Llimos4.   

Abstract

Regulatory agencies are increasing the pharmacogenomic information in their official drug labeling. However, despite the importance of regulatory harmonization, this implementation may not be running in parallel among major agencies. Comparing labeling of medicines approved by different agencies may identify gaps to solve. Our study compared the cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetic information included in the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels and European Union (EU) Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs). US labels presented significantly more specific pharmacogenetic subheadings (51 vs 26%), more prevalence and pharmacokinetic data for each metabolic phenotype (59 vs 25% and 82 vs 48%, respectively) and more applicable information about dose modifications required (25 vs 5%). Approximately 75% of the US labels evaluated scored higher on the overall quality than the analogous EU SmPCs, and this difference was not associated with the time since the EU SmPCs' last review. To enhance harmonization, regulatory agencies should simultaneously introduce the pharmacogenetic information in their drug labeling.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27241061     DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2016.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J        ISSN: 1470-269X            Impact factor:   3.550


  35 in total

Review 1.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.

Authors:  Julius Sim; Chris C Wright
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-03

2.  The quality of information on monitoring for haematological adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  R E Ferner; Jamie Coleman; Munir Pirmohamed; Simon A Constable; Andrew Rouse
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Clinical pharmacology information in summaries of product characteristics and package inserts.

Authors:  B Arguello; F Fernandez-Llimos
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Clinical relevance of information in the Summaries of Product Characteristics for dose adjustment in renal impairment.

Authors:  Teresa M Salgado; Blanca Arguello; Fernando Martinez-Martinez; Shalom I Benrimoj; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  e-SPC - delivering drug information in the 21st century: developing new approaches to deliver drug information to prescribers.

Authors:  Simon Maxwell; Hans-Georg Eichler; Anna Bucsics; Walter E Haefeli; Lars L Gustafsson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Pharmacogenetic testing for drug metabolizing enzymes: is it happening in practice?

Authors:  Sharon J Gardiner; Evan J Begg
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Information deficits in the summary of product characteristics preclude an optimal management of drug interactions: a comparison with evidence from the literature.

Authors:  Verena Bergk; Walter E Haefeli; Christiane Gasse; Hermann Brenner; Meret Martin-Facklam
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Information for adequate prescribing to older patients : an evaluation of the product information of 53 recently approved medicines.

Authors:  Erna Beers; Toine C G Egberts; Hubert G M Leufkens; Paul A F Jansen
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Geographical/interracial differences in polymorphic drug oxidation. Current state of knowledge of cytochromes P450 (CYP) 2D6 and 2C19.

Authors:  L Bertilsson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Feasibility of incorporating genomic knowledge into electronic medical records for pharmacogenomic clinical decision support.

Authors:  Casey Lynnette Overby; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; James I Hoath; Ira J Kalet; David L Veenstra
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pharmacogenomic biomarker information differences between drug labels in the United States and Hungary: implementation from medical practitioner view.

Authors:  Reka Varnai; Istvan Szabo; Greta Tarlos; Laszlo Jozsef Szentpeteri; Attila Sik; Sandor Balogh; Csilla Sipeky
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.550

2.  Pharmacogenetic information in Swiss drug labels - a systematic analysis.

Authors:  C Jeiziner; K Suter; U Wernli; J M Barbarino; L Gong; M Whirl-Carrillo; T E Klein; T D Szucs; K E Hersberger; H E Meyer Zu Schwabedissen
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.550

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.