Literature DB >> 27240695

Examining the psychosocial determinants of women's decisions to delay childbearing.

Allison L Kearney1, Katherine M White2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What are the psychosocial determinants of women's intentions to delay childbearing until after 35 years? SUMMARY ANSWER: Attitudes, pressure from important others, perceived self-confidence and anticipated regret all influence the decision-making process of women aged 18-30 years to defer their attempts to conceive their first child until 35+ years. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Research has consistently demonstrated that, for many women, the decision to delay childbearing can lead to 'unintentional childlessness' due to a failure to consider the impact of age-related fertility decline. A large body of literature has also found strong links between age-related involuntary infertility and negative psychological impacts, including an increased prevalence of anxiety, depression, guilt, stigma and poor mental health. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study initially conducted focus groups designed to ascertain important beliefs informing participants' intentions to delay childbearing. A subsequent larger-scale quantitative questionnaire followed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Participants (n = 358) were female, aged between 18 and 30 years, lived in Australia, identified as being open to the idea of having children, were heterosexual, had not already had children, were not already pregnant, and had not received a diagnosis of medical infertility prior to participating. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed strong support for psychosocial predictors of attitude, pressure from others and perceived self-confidence as predictors of women's intentions to delay childbearing, accounting for 59% of total variance. The extended model that included anticipated regret, accounted for a significant additional 4.4% variance in intention to delay childbearing past the age of 35 years. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Proportionally more participants were younger, Caucasian, and were university students, thus limiting the generalizability of results to the wider Australian community. Future research in this domain is recommended to adopt a prospective design and incorporate a measure of behaviour to investigate the link between intentions to delay childbearing and future fertility behaviour. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: This research augments our understanding of the decision-making process and key beliefs underlying the decision to delay childbearing. Further efforts are needed to advise young women to investigate their fertility options during the peak of their reproductive years in order to prevent negative psychological consequences associated with unintentional childlessness. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes; beliefs; delayed childbearing; fertility; intentions; involuntary childlessness; psychosocial determinants; regret; theory of planned behaviour; young women

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27240695     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Guidelines informing counseling on female age-related fertility decline: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emma Trawick; Jillian Pecoriello; Gwendolyn Quinn; Kara N Goldman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the female infertility stigma instrument (ISI-F): protocol for a mixed method study.

Authors:  Mahboubeh Taebi; Nourossadat Kariman; Ali Montazeri; Hamid Alavi Majd
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Effect of fertility health awareness strategies on fertility knowledge and childbearing in young married couples (FertStart): study protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type I multicentre three-arm parallel group open-label randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Sze Ling Chan; Julian Thumboo; Jacky Boivin; Seyed Ehsan Saffari; Shanqing Yin; Samantha Rachel Yeo; Jerry Kok Yen Chan; Kee Chong Ng; Ka-Hee Chua; Su Ling Yu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Current fertility desire and its associated factors among currently married eligible couples in urban and rural area of Puducherry, south India.

Authors:  Ganesh Kumar Saya; Kariyarath Cheriyath Premarajan; Gautam Roy; Sonali Sarkar; Sitanshu Sekhar Kar; Revathi Ulaganeethi; Jeby Jose Olickal
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 0.927

5.  The changing tide of human fertility.

Authors:  R John Aitken
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Is the Predisposition to Have More Children Beneficial among Parents with Only One Child? Evidence from Spanish Parents.

Authors:  Olga Gómez-Ortiz; Carmen Sánchez-Sánchez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Infertility Stigma: A Qualitative Study on Feelings and Experiences of Infertile Women.

Authors:  Mahboubeh Taebi; Nourossadat Kariman; Ali Montazeri; Hamid Alavi Majd
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-06-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.