Kelly A Danks1, Ryan Pohlig2, Darcy S Reisman3. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE. 2. Biostatistics Core Facility, University of Delaware, Newark, DE. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE; Biomechanics and Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE. Electronic address: dreisman@udel.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine preliminary efficacy and to identify baseline characteristics predicting who would benefit most from fast walking training plus a step activity monitoring program (FAST+SAM) compared with fast walking training (FAST) alone in persons with chronic stroke. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with blinded assessors. SETTING: Outpatient clinical research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=37) >6 months poststroke. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were assigned to either FAST, which was walking training at their fastest possible speed on the treadmill (30min) and overground 3 times per week for 12 weeks, or FAST+SAM. The step activity monitoring program consisted of daily step monitoring with an activity monitor, goal setting, and identification of barriers to activity and strategies to overcome barriers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Daily step activity metrics (steps/day [SPD], time walking per day), walking speed, and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance. RESULTS: There was a significant effect of time for both groups, with all outcomes improving from pre- to posttraining (all P values <.05). The FAST+SAM was superior to FAST for 6MWT (P=.018), with a larger increase in the FAST+SAM group. The interventions had differential effectiveness based on baseline step activity. Sequential moderated regression models demonstrated that for subjects with baseline levels of step activity and 6MWT distances that were below the mean, the FAST+SAM intervention was more effective than FAST (1715±1584 vs 254±933 SPD; P<.05 for overall model and ΔR(2) for SPD and 6MWT). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a step activity monitoring program to a fast walking training intervention may be most effective in persons with chronic stroke who have initial low levels of walking endurance and activity. Regardless of baseline performance, the FAST+SAM intervention was more effective for improving walking endurance.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To determine preliminary efficacy and to identify baseline characteristics predicting who would benefit most from fast walking training plus a step activity monitoring program (FAST+SAM) compared with fast walking training (FAST) alone in persons with chronic stroke. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with blinded assessors. SETTING:Outpatient clinical research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=37) >6 months poststroke. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were assigned to either FAST, which was walking training at their fastest possible speed on the treadmill (30min) and overground 3 times per week for 12 weeks, or FAST+SAM. The step activity monitoring program consisted of daily step monitoring with an activity monitor, goal setting, and identification of barriers to activity and strategies to overcome barriers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Daily step activity metrics (steps/day [SPD], time walking per day), walking speed, and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance. RESULTS: There was a significant effect of time for both groups, with all outcomes improving from pre- to posttraining (all P values <.05). The FAST+SAM was superior to FAST for 6MWT (P=.018), with a larger increase in the FAST+SAM group. The interventions had differential effectiveness based on baseline step activity. Sequential moderated regression models demonstrated that for subjects with baseline levels of step activity and 6MWT distances that were below the mean, the FAST+SAM intervention was more effective than FAST (1715±1584 vs 254±933 SPD; P<.05 for overall model and ΔR(2) for SPD and 6MWT). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a step activity monitoring program to a fast walking training intervention may be most effective in persons with chronic stroke who have initial low levels of walking endurance and activity. Regardless of baseline performance, the FAST+SAM intervention was more effective for improving walking endurance.
Authors: Richard F Macko; Elaina Haeuber; Marianne Shaughnessy; Kim L Coleman; David A Boone; Gerald V Smith; Kenneth H Silver Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Bryan Blissmer; Michael R Deschenes; Barry A Franklin; Michael J Lamonte; I-Min Lee; David C Nieman; David P Swain Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Elaina Haeuber; Marianne Shaughnessy; Larry W Forrester; Kim L Coleman; Richard F Macko Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Kathleen Michael; Andrew P Goldberg; Margarita S Treuth; Jeffrey Beans; Peter Normandt; Richard F Macko Journal: Top Stroke Rehabil Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.119
Authors: Louis N Awad; Jacqueline A Palmer; Ryan T Pohlig; Stuart A Binder-Macleod; Darcy S Reisman Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2014-10-05 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: T George Hornby; Abbey Plawecki; Jennifer K Lotter; Molly E Scofield; Emily Lucas; Christopher E Henderson Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2022-08-04
Authors: Elizabeth A Lynch; Taryn M Jones; Dawn B Simpson; Natalie A Fini; Suzanne S Kuys; Karen Borschmann; Sharon Kramer; Liam Johnson; Michele L Callisaya; Niruthikha Mahendran; Heidi Janssen; Coralie English Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-07-27
Authors: Denise M Peters; Emma S O'Brien; Kira E Kamrud; Shawn M Roberts; Talia A Rooney; Kristen P Thibodeau; Swapna Balakrishnan; Nancy Gell; Sambit Mohapatra Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Susan Marzolini; Che-Yuan Wu; Rowaida Hussein; Lisa Y Xiong; Suban Kangatharan; Ardit Peni; Christopher R Cooper; Kylie S K Lau; Ghislaine Nzodjou Makhdoom; Maureen Pakosh; Stephanie A Zaban; Michelle M Nguyen; Mohammad Amin Banihashemi; Walter Swardfager Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Reed Handlery; Elizabeth W Regan; Jill C Stewart; Christine Pellegrini; Courtney Monroe; Garrett Hainline; Kaci Handlery; Stacy L Fritz Journal: Stroke Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Henry Wright; Tamara Wright; Ryan T Pohlig; Scott E Kasner; Jonathan Raser-Schramm; Darcy Reisman Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 2.474