| Literature DB >> 27240095 |
Michelle A Kominiarek1, Shirley Scott2, Abigail R Koch3, Maripat Zeschke2, Yvette Cordova1, Samadh F Ravangard1, Deborah Schy4, Stacie E Geller2.
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to compare severe morbidity due to obstetrical hemorrhage and its potential preventability before and after a mandated provider training initiative on obstetric hemorrhage. Study Design Cases of severe morbidity due to obstetric hemorrhage during 2006 (n = 64 before training initiative) and 2010 (n = 71 after training initiative) were identified by a two-factor scoring system of intensive care unit admission and/or transfusion of ≥ 3 units of blood products and reviewed by an expert panel. Preventable factors were categorized as provider, system, and/or patient related. Results Potential preventability did not differ between 2006 and 2010, p = 0.19. Provider factors remained the most common preventable factor (88.2% in 2006 vs. 97.4% in 2010, p = 0.18), but the distribution in types of preventable factors improved over time for delay or failure in assessment (20.6 vs. 0%, p < 0.01) and delay or inappropriate treatment (76.5 vs. 39.5%, p < 0.01). System factors also differed (32.4 vs. 7.9%, p = 0.015) with a notable decline in factors related to policies and procedures (26.5 vs. 2.6%, p < 0.01) between 2006 and 2010. Conclusion We found significant improvement in provider assessment and treatment of obstetric hemorrhage and a significant reduction in preventable factors related to policies and procedures after the training initiative. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27240095 DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1584274
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Perinatol ISSN: 0735-1631 Impact factor: 1.862