| Literature DB >> 27239587 |
Zhale Rajavi1, Sara Mokhtari2, Hamideh Sabbaghi3, Mehdi Yaseri4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the long-term visual acuity (VA) outcome after congenital cataract surgery at Imam Hossein Medical Center (Tertiary Referral Center) (2004-2014).Entities:
Keywords: Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); Complications; Congenital cataract surgery
Year: 2016 PMID: 27239587 PMCID: PMC4881158 DOI: 10.1016/j.joco.2015.11.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Curr Ophthalmol ISSN: 2452-2325
Fig. 1Flowchart of our study procedure. MR: mental retardation; yrs: years; n: number.
Demographic data of our patients.
| Parameters | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Age at the last visit (years) | Mean ± SD | 11.8 ± 6 |
| Median (range) | 11 (5–26) | |
| Sex (%) | Male | 20 (47.6%) |
| Female | 22 (52.4%) | |
| Nystagmus | No | 36 (85.7%) |
| Yes | 6 (14.2%) | |
| Microphthalmia | No | 63 (88.7%) |
| Yes | 8 (11.3%) | |
| Laterality | OD | 10 (23.8%) |
| OS | 3 (7.1%) | |
| OU | 29 (69.0%) | |
| Strabismus | No | 22 (52.3%) |
| Yes | 20 (47.6%) | |
| Age of surgery (months) | Mean ± SD | 65 ± 66.6 |
| Median (range) | 37 (1–200) | |
| ≤3 | 15 (21.1%) | |
| >3 | 56 (78.9%) | |
| ≤6 | 21 (29.6%) | |
| >6 | 50 (70.4%) | |
| ≤12 | 30 (42.3%) | |
| >12 | 41 (57.7%) | |
| Surgical Interval (months) | Mean ± SD | 12.9 ± 23.5 |
| Median (range) | 3 (0–96) | |
| Follow Up (months) | Mean ± SD | 76 ± 65 |
| Median (range) | 60 (6–240) |
OD: oculus dexter; OS: oculus sinister; OU: oculus uterque; SD: standard deviation.
Fig. 2Different types of cataract. Mixed cataract: two or more types of cataract.
Surgical and optical managements of congenital cataract in our participants.
| Parameters | Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lensectomy | No | 7 (9.9%) | |
| Yes | 64 (90.1%) | ||
| Aspiration | No | 65 (91.5%) | |
| Yes | 6 (8.5%) | ||
| Plus P. capsulectomy | No | 4 (5.6%) | |
| Yes | 67 (94.4%) | ||
| Plus Ant. Vitx | No | 6 (8.5%) | |
| Yes | 65 (91.5%) | ||
| IOL | No | 21 (29.6%) | |
| Yes | 50 (70.4%) | ||
| Primary | 38 (76.0%) | ||
| Secondary | 12 (24.0%) | ||
| Refractive Correction | Glasses | 17 (23.9%) | |
| C.Lens | 4 (5.6%) | ||
| IOL | 10 (14.1%) | ||
| IOL plus Glasses | 40 (56.3%) | ||
| Amblyopia | No | 31 (43.7%) | |
| Yes | 40 (56.3%) | ||
| Compliance of amblyopia therapy | No | 20 (49.3%) | |
| Partial | 12 (29.0%) | ||
| Yes | 2 (21.7%) |
ECCE: extra capsular cataract extraction; P: posterior; Ant: anterior; Vitx: vitrectomy.
IOL: intra ocular lens; C.Lens: contact lens; Phaco: phacoemulsification; ASP: aspiration.
Visual and refractive outcomes of our participants.
| Parameters | p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCVA (LogMAR) | Total | Mean ± SD | 0.46 ± 0.43 | ||
| Median (range) | 0.3 (0–1.8) | ||||
| Correction | Glasses | Mean ± SD | 0.7 ± 0.53 | 0.190 | |
| Median (range) | 0.6 (0.1–1.7) | ||||
| C.Lens | Mean ± SD | 0.7 ± 0 | |||
| Median (range) | 0.7 (0.7–0.7) | ||||
| IOL | Mean ± SD | 0.29 ± 0.28 | |||
| Median (range) | 0.26 (0–1) | ||||
| IOL + Glasses | Mean ± SD | 0.37 ± 0.39 | |||
| Median (range) | 0.22 (0–1.8) | ||||
| SE (D) | IOL | No | Mean ± SD | 11.76 ± 3.54 | <0.001 |
| Median (range) | 11.13 (6.75–20) | ||||
| Yes | Mean ± SD | −1.55 ± 1.91 | |||
| Median (range) | −1 (−6.5 to 1.25) | ||||
| Stereopsis (sec/arc) | No | 19 (45.2%) | |||
| Yes | 23 (54.8%) | ||||
| Value | Mean ± SD | 681 ± 960 | |||
| Median (range) | 400 (30–3000) |
BCVA: best corrected visual acuity; LogMAR: logarithm minimum angle of resolution; C.Lens: contact lens; IOL: intra ocular lens; Sph: spherical; SE: spherical equivalent; sec: second.
Based on Mann–Whitney test.
Based on Kruskal–Wallis test.
Fig. 3Post-operative complications of our participants. PCO: Posterior Capsular Opacity; Vit: vitreous; IOL: Intra Ocular Lens.
Risk factors of post-operative best corrected visual acuity.
| Best corrected visual acuity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Mean ± SD | Median (range) | p | |
| Sex | Male | 0.31 ± 0.33 | 0.22 (0–1.8) | 0.007 |
| Female | 0.59 ± 0.48 | 0.52 (0–1.7) | ||
| Laterality | OD | 0.94 ± 0.49 | 0.7 (0.22–1.8) | <0.001 |
| OS | 0.93 ± 0.21 | 1 (0.7–1.1) | ||
| OU | 0.35 ± 0.36 | 0.3 (0–1.7) | ||
| Nystagmus | No | 0.42 ± 0.45 | 0.3 (0–1.8) | 0.007 |
| Yes | 0.66 ± 0.22 | 0.7 (0.22–1) | ||
| Strabismus | No | 0.3 ± 0.24 | 0.26 (0–1) | 0.009 |
| Yes | 0.63 ± 0.53 | 0.7 (0–1.8) | ||
| Posterior subcapsular cataract | No | 0.34 ± 0.25 | 0.3 (0–1) | 0.364 |
| Yes | 0.56 ± 0.53 | 0.3 (0.05–1.7) | ||
| Anterior subcapsular cataract | No | 0.44 ± 0.43 | 0.3 (0–1.7) | 0.197 |
| Yes | 1 ± 0.0 | 1 (1–1) | ||
| Zonular cataract | No | 0.49 ± 0.45 | 0.3 (0–1.7) | 0.048 |
| Yes | 0.17 ± 0.13 | 0.16 (0–0.4) | ||
| Nuclear cataract | No | 0.44 ± 0.45 | 0.3 (0–1.8) | 0.962 |
| Yes | 0.48 ± 0.53 | 0.3 (0–1.7) | ||
| Total cataract | No | 0.43 ± 0.41 | 0.3 (0–1.7) | 0.153 |
| Yes | 0.62 ± 0.53 | 0.3 (0.22–1.7) | ||
| Mixed cataract | No | 0.43 ± 0.32 | 0.3 (0–1.2) | 0.780 |
| Yes | 0.53 ± 0.53 | 0.3 (0.05–1.7) | ||
| Compliance | No | 0.45 ± 0.4 | 0.3 (0–1.7) | 0.934 |
| Yes/No | 0.34 ± 0.22 | 0.3 (0–0.9) | ||
| Yes | 0.47 ± 0.49 | 0.3 (0–1.8) | ||
| Age of surgery (months) | ≤3 | 0.56 ± 0.44 | 0.3 (0.1–1.7) | |
| >3 | 0.32 ± 0.29 | 0.25 (0–0.7) | ||
| ≤6 | 0.49 ± 0.41 | 0.3 (0–1.7) | 0.206 | |
| >6 | 0.78 ± 0.60 | 0.7 (0.1–1.7) | ||
| ≤12 | 0.78 ± 0.60 | 0.7 (0.1–1.7) | ||
| >12 | 0.37 ± 0.37 | 0.22 (0–1.8) | ||
| Glaucoma | No | 0.46 ± 0.46 | 0.3 (0–1.8) | 0.984 |
| Yes | 0.44 ± 0.34 | 0.52 (0–1.1) | ||
| PCO | No | 0.42 ± 0.37 | 0.3 (0–1.8) | 0.992 |
| Yes | 0.43 ± 0.49 | 0.3 (0–1.7) | ||
PCO: posterior capsular opacity; IOL: intra ocular lens; SD: standard deviation; OD: oculus dexter; OS: oculus sinister; OU: oculus uterque.
Based on Mann–Whitney or Kruskal–Wallis test, whenever appropriate. We found no statistical relation between the surgical interval of two eyes and final BCVA (r = −0.166, p = 0.218).